Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: cantonments act 2006 section 194 · Page 1 of about 17 results (0.032 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Oct 30 2007

Dr. K. Babu Vs. Cantonment Executive Officer and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Oct-30-2007

Subject : CivilProperty

Acts : Cantonments Act, 1924 - Sections 2, 2(4), 179, 181, 181A, 181(3), 194 and 194(2); Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 16; Cantonments (Amendment) Act, 2006 - Sections 261; Hyderabad Municipal Corporations Act, 1955; Aircraft Act

Reported in : 2008(2)ALD330

Act', for the purpose of convenience) and also had drawn the attention to the corresponding provisions under the Cantonments Act, 2006 (Act 41 of 2006). The learned Counsel would contend that the objections raised in the counter-affidavit are not … by the petitioner cannot be granted. The learned Counsel had also drawn the attention of this Court to Section 194(2)(a) of the Act and would maintain that in the light of the same, the objections raised by the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 30 2007

Dr. K.S. Ashok Kumar S/O. Late Sri K. Sailoo Vs. the Cantonment Execut ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Oct-30-2007

Subject : Civil

Acts : Cantonments Act, 1924 - Sections 2, 2(4), 179, 181, 181(3), 181A, 194 and 194(2); Cantonments (Amendment) Act, 2006 - Sections 261; Hyderabad Municipal Corporations Act, 1955; Aircraft Act; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 16

Reported in : 2008(1)ALD580

Act', for the purpose of convenience) and also had drawn the attention to the corresponding provisions under the Cantonments Act, 2006 (Act 41 of 2006). The learned Counsel would contend that the objections raised in the counter affidavit are … by the petitioner cannot be granted. The learned Counsel had also drawn the attention of this Court to Section 194(2)(a) of the Act and would maintain that in the light of the same, the objections raised by the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 11 1962

A.J. Faridi and anr. Vs. Chairman, U.P. Legislative Council (R.V. Dhul ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jul-11-1962

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 168, 174, 183, 185, 185(1), 194(3), 196, 201, 203(1), 208, 208(1), 212(1), 226 and 246; Procedure Rules - Rule 143

Reported in : AIR1963All75

not ultra vires of the Constitution of India and chairman not acted in excess of his power. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … supportof the same, being inconsistent with Article 183, is ultra vires the Constitution.7. It was contended that Article 194(3) of the Constitution prescribes the powers, privileges and immunities of a House of the Legislature of a State

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Oct 26 1911

Bishambhar Nath Vs. Bhullo and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Oct-26-1911

Subject : TenancyCivil

Reported in : (1912)ILR34All98

lambardar against co-sharers for excess of profits due to other co-sharers and himself--Lambardar not agent of co-sharers. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … money realized by the defendants, and this contention is said to be based upon the words contained in Section 194 of the Local Act No. II of 1901. It is urged before us that the lambardar must be

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 07 2006

Ariselli Srinivasa Rao Vs. District Collector and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Dec-07-2006

Subject : Other Taxes

Acts : Andhra Pradesh Panchayat Raj Act, 1994 - Sections 104, 104(2) and 194; Motor Vehicles Act, 1988

Reported in : 2007(2)ALD478; 2007(3)ALT124

to supra.16. With the above clarification, the writ petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … order of the 3rd respondent vide Letter No. 45/06 dated 3-5-2006 as bad and illegal, arbitrary, violative under Section 194 of the Act and violative of the terms and conditions of agreement with the 3rd respondent dated 31-3-2006

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 06 1963

Udhoo Dass Vs. Prem Prakash and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Feb-06-1963

Subject : TenancyContract

Acts : Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 10 and 23; Uttar Pradesh (Temporary) Control of Rent and Eviction Act - Sections 7(2); Uttar Pradesh Act, 1947

Reported in : AIR1964All1

of order under section 7(2) of U.P. (Temporary) Control of Rent and Eviction Act is not void. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … 2 is the owner of a shop governed by the U.P. (Temporary) Control of Rent and Eviction Act, 194/ and had let it out to Sharma Provision Stores. On 1-2-52 respondent No. 1 who will be referred

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 31 1969

Binda Prasad Vs. Madho Prasad and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Dec-31-1969

Subject : Civil

Reported in : (1880)ILR2All129

Procedure Code), S. 194. - Decree payable by instalments--Act X Of 1877 (Civil Procedure Code), Section 210. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 31 2005

Special Deputy Collector, Land Acquisition (Slbc) Vs. Bolloju Gopaiah ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jan-31-2005

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 4(1) and 18

Reported in : 2006(2)ALD359

Matched in: Citation 2006(2)ALD359

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 10 1944

Mohd. Ishaq and ors. Vs. Emperor

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jul-10-1944

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : AIR1945All60

action. For the reasons given above I allow this application for revision and quash the entire proceedings. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … ORDERVerma, J.1. This revision-petition has arisen out of an application filed on 13th December 1943, by one Mohammad Ibrahim in the Court of the Sub-Divisional Magistrate of Dehradun praying that action be taken

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 16 2009

Vithabai Bama Bhandari Indian Inhabitant Vs. State of Maharashtra and ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-16-2009

Subject : Property

Acts : Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 - Sections 8, 9, 10, 10(1), 10(2), 10(3), 10(5), 10(6), 11, 12, 13, 14, 20, 20(1) and 20(2); ;Urban Land Ceiling (Repeal) Act, 1999 - Sections 2, 3, 3(1), 4, 5, 6, 7, 8(3), 8(4), 9, 10, 10(1), 10(2), 10(3), 11, 14, 20, 23, 33; Maharashtra Ownership Flats Act, 1963; Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960; General Clauses Act - Sections 6; Cantonments Act, 1924 - Sections 3; Constitution of India - Articles 252, 252(1), 252(2) and 226

Reported in : 2009(3)BomCR663; 2009(111)BomLR2093; 2009(4)MhLj693

Union Territory or within the local limits of a cantonment declared as such under Section 3 of the Cantonments Act, 1924, means that State Government.'20. Power to exempt : (1) Notwithstanding anything contained in any of the foregoing … order No. KDMC/DP/BP/Koliwali/473/194. The said constructions was completed within the time prescribed for the same.10. On 5th January, 2006, petitioner vide her letter requested respondent No. 2 to take possession of the flats, along with affidavit mentioning

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial