Advanced Search Results

Khaja Kutubuddin Khan S/O Late Khaja Moi Vs. The Secunderabad Cantonme ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Land Acquisition

said premises without notice and without following due process of law, contrary to the provisions of the Cantonment Act, 2006 (referred to as new Act) and in violation of Article 300- A of the constitution of India. Petitioners … 6.6.1990 and accordingly the marriage hall was established and was functioning for long time. On 6.4.2001 notice under Section 185 of Cantonment Act 1924 (referred to as Old Act) was issued alleging that unauthorized constructions were made on … Khaja Mansion, Road No.36, Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad and another Petitioners The Secunderabad Cantonment Board, Court compound, S P Road, SEcunderabad Rep by its Chief Executive

Cantonment Board,meerut . Vs. Afzal

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Education

originally governed by the 1924 Act. The said Act is repealed by virtue of Section 360 of the Cantonments Act, 2006 (for short, ‘the 2006 Act’). The 2006 Act came into force w.e.f. 18.12.2006.4. Before the new Act has … the High Court, respondents - original petitioners have prayed for quashing of notices issued by the appellants under Section 185 of the Cantonments Act, 1924 (for short, ‘the 1924 Act’) for stopping the alleged constructions raised unauthorisedly by

Mani Ram Vs. State Through the Notified Area

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Municipalities Act, 1916 - Sections 180, 180(1), 180(2), 180(3), 185 and 338; United Provinces Act, 1919 - Sections 15

Reported in : AIR1952All40

as they stood in year 1917 - held, applicant can not be convicted under amended Section 185. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.

A.J. Faridi and anr. Vs. Chairman, U.P. Legislative Council (R.V. Dhul ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 168, 174, 183, 185, 185(1), 194(3), 196, 201, 203(1), 208, 208(1), 212(1), 226 and 246; Procedure Rules - Rule 143

Reported in : AIR1963All75

not ultra vires of the Constitution of India and chairman not acted in excess of his power. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … and not effective and further ordering the Chairman to proceed according to the provisions of Articles 183 and 185 of the Constitution without applying Rule 143 aforesaid on the ground that it was ultra vires and illegal.5.

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Veerabhadra Industries

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 22, 28, 185 and 263

Reported in : [1999]240ITR5(AP)

income was not business income - held, assessee-firm not entitled to benefit under Section 185 (1) (a). - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.

Anand Prakash Agrawal Son of Shri Dhan Prakash Agrawal Vs. Cantonment ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Contempt of Court

Acts : Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 - Sections 2, 19 and 20; Cantonment Act, 1924 - Sections 185 and 274; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 39, Rule 2A; Constitution of India - Article 215

Reported in : 2006(3)AWC2854

Matched in: Citation 2006(3)AWC2854

Danish Infratech Private Limited Vs. Delhi Cantonment Board

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Court of Karnataka in Cantonment Board Vs. Asif Alim Sait AIR2004Kant. 158, though also held, while dealing with Section 185 of the Cantonments Act, 1924 which is identical to Section 248 of the 2006 Act, that no hearing … This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, besides seeking declaration that Section 248(1) of the Cantonments Act, 2006 is unconstitutional and ultra vires the scheme of the Constitution of India, also seeks quashing of the notices

Danish Infratech Private Limited Vs. Delhi Cantonment Board

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Court of Karnataka in Cantonment Board Vs. Asif Alim Sait AIR2004Kant. 158, though also held, while dealing with Section 185 of the Cantonments Act, 1924 which is identical to Section 248 of the 2006 Act, that no hearing … This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, besides seeking declaration that Section 248(1) of the Cantonments Act, 2006 is unconstitutional and ultra vires the scheme of the Constitution of India, also seeks quashing of the notices

Danish Infratech Private Limited Vs. Delhi Cantonment Board

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Court of Karnataka in Cantonment Board Vs. Asif Alim Sait AIR2004Kant. 158, though also held, while dealing with Section 185 of the Cantonments Act, 1924 which is identical to Section 248 of the 2006 Act, that no hearing … This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, besides seeking declaration that Section 248(1) of the Cantonments Act, 2006 is unconstitutional and ultra vires the scheme of the Constitution of India, also seeks quashing of the notices

Ch. Kankaiah Vs. Regional Transport Officer, Warangal

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Andhra Pradesh Motor Vehicles Taxation Rules, 1963 - Rule 12-A; Andhra Pradesh Motor Vehicles Rules, 1989 - Rule 185(1)

Reported in : 1999(3)ALD733; 1999(4)ALT90

at maximum rate in terms of Government Order at rate of Rs. 2500 per seat per quarter. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … when it is not engaged and it shall be available for hire thereat. Reference be made to Rule 185(1)(e)(iii) of the A.P. Motor Vehicles Rules, 1989 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Andlira Rules')- It would remain within