Advanced Search Results

R. Wall and anr. Vs. J.E. Howard and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Limitation

Reported in : (1896)ILR18All215

Companies Act) Sections 162, 169, 214 - Appeal--Limitation--Act No. XV of 1877 (Indian Limitation Act), Section 12. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.

A.P. Sarpanches Association and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Election

Acts : Andhra Pradesh Legislative Council Act, 2005 - Sections 4; Representation of People Act, 1950 - Sections 15, 16, 18, 22, 23, 27, 27(1) and 27(2); Andhra Pradesh Panchayat Raj Act, 1994 - Sections 2(17), 2(18), 2(23), 2(45), 6, 8, 11, 12, 14(1), 45, 117, 140, 148, 148(1), 149(1), 150, 151, 161, 177(1), 177(2), 177(3), 178, 179, 192 and 222; Representation of People (Amendment) Act, 1963; Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Act, 1955 - Sections 1A, 1B, 1C, 5 and 8 to 12; Andhra Pradesh Municipalities Act, 1965 - Sections 8 to 12; Cantonments Act, 1924; Cantonments Act, 2006; Municipal Corporations Act, 1994; Andhra Pradesh Districts (Formation) Act, 1974 - Sections 3; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 169, 169(1), 171, 171(1) to 171(4), 243, 243A, 243B, 243E, 243G, 243K, 243P and 243Q

Reported in : AIR2007AP273; 2007(4)ALD783; 2007(5)ALT707

Cantonment Boards owe their existence to the Cantonments Act, 1924 (The 1924 Act has been repealed by the Cantonments Act, 2006), and Zilla Parishads and Mandal Parishads owe their existence to the Andhra Pradesh Panchayat Raj Act, 1994. Section … are purely based on the resolution passed by the Legislative Assembly of the State in terms of Article 169(1) of the Constitution of India, and the provisions of the 2005 Act cannot be struck down by invoking

Sardar Singh Vs. U.P. State Road Transport Corporation

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 165(1), 166, 168 and 169; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 115 - Order 5, Rules 9 to 13 and 15 to 33 - Order IX - Order XIII, Rule 3 to 10 - Order 13 - Order 26, Rules 2 to 21 - Order 16 - Order XVII - Order 18 - Order 23, Rules 1 to 3 - Order 26, Rule 4; Uttar Pradesh Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal Rules, 1967 - Rules 12 and 21; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 195; Uttar Pradesh Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal Act, 1939 - Sections 111A

Reported in : 1992ACJ463; AIR1992All33

4 would apply to the proceedings before Motor Accidents Claim Tribunal - held, not applicable -Revision Dismissed. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … Driver or owner of the vehicles involved in the accident or by all or any of them. S. 169 provides procedure and powers of the Claims Tribunal. It provides that Tribunal may subject to any rules that

Reference Under Section 28 of Act No. Vii of 1870

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Company

Reported in : (1895)ILR17All238

Companies Act) Sections 169, 214 - Appeal--Court-fee--Act No. VII, 1870 (Court fees Act), Schedule ii, Article 11(b). - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.

Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Limited (Mtnl) vs Delhi Cantonment Board, Th ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

tax by the respondent. However, on 1st December 2021, the respondent issued notices under Section 116 of the Cantonments Act, 2006 (hereinafter ‘Act’), seeking information for the purpose of assessment of property tax. This was followed by another notice … Act, and the writ petition should not have been entertained.12. Evidently, the writ petition was filed because under Section 169 ofthe Act there is a requirement of a pre-deposit of the disputed amount by the appellant with the

Cwp No. 13992 of 2010 Vs. State of Punjab and Another

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Land Acquisition

is occupancy and land is not being transferred which continues to belong to Government of India.5. Sec. 354 Cantonments Act, 2006, uses the term “forthwith”., the State Government should issue direction for compliance and for supply of sale deeds … right transferred is occupancy and land is not being transferred which continues to belong to Government of India.5. Sec. 354 Cantonments Act, 2006, uses the term “forthwith”., the State Government should issue direction for compliance and for … Court in Raj Singh Versus The Union of India and others, AIR1973Delhi 169. This judgment has been followed by a Full Bench of the Allahabad

Ramji Dixit and anr. Vs. Bhrigunath and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Tenancy Laws; Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1951 - Sections 18, 134, 137, 152, 169, 169(2), 171, 172, 172A and 174; Transfer of Property Act - Sections 6; Agricultural Tenants (Acquisition of Privileges) Act - Sections 7C

Reported in : AIR1965All1

and effective not only during her life or until her marriage but valid beyond her life time. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … continue to be valid after her death. The first provision which leads me to take that view is Section 169 of the Act, which reads as follows:'169. (1) A bhumidhar may by will bequeath his holding or any

Bindeshwari Vs. Board of Revenue and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Property

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Land Revenue Act, 1901 - Sections 34; Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950 - Sections 169 and 171; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2002(1)AWC498

a mode of succession and not transfer - application for mutation is maintainable when Will becomes operative. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … deed, grant, gift or any form of purchase or contract.'9. The U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, Section 169, clearly contemplates that a Bhumidhar with transferable right may by Will bequeath his holdings or any part thereof.

M. Shashikala Vs. Station House Officer and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 36, 169, 173(2) and 200; Constitution of India - Article 226; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 323, 427, 448 and 506

Reported in : 2001(2)ALD(Cri)220; 2001(4)ALT22; 2001(2)ALT(Cri)175

- remedy was not to invoke writ jurisdiction - only remedy available was to approach concerned Magistrate. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … a Magistrate to call upon the police to submit a charge-sheet, when they have sent a report under section 169 of the Code, that there is no case made out for sending up an accused for trial. 11.

Bhup NaraIn Saxena Vs. State Through District Co-operative Officer

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 237 and 561A; Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 - Sections 4, 5, 5(2), 6 and 7; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 161, 165, 409, 420, 465, 468, 471 and 477A

Reported in : AIR1952All35

and punished under either or any of these enactments but shall not be subjected to double jeopardy. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … the Penal Code, though the accused could be convicted under the Cattle Trespass Act as well as under Section 169, Penal Code. The same view was taken in Proceedings of the High Court, 22.2-1876, l Mad 55 where