Advanced Search Results

B. Lakshman and anr. Vs. the Union of India (Uoi), Ministry of Defence ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : CivilElection

Acts : Cantonments Act, 1924 - Sections 16(1), 17 and 54; Cantonment Act, 2006 - Sections 1(3), 2, 10, 10(2), 12, 13, 13(1), 13(3), 13(4), 14, 28, 29, 30, 32, 34, 60, 360, 360(1) and 360(2); A.P. Municipalities Act, 1965 - Sections 62, 62(1) and 62(4); Constitution of India - Articles 14, 21, 243B, 243P, 243Q and 243S

Reported in : 2008(2)ALD429; 2008(1)ALT443

19.05.2006, which was notified by the Government of India under Section 16(1) of the Cantonments Act, 1924, the Cantonments Act 2006 (41 of 2006) has come into force w.e.f. 18.12.2006. By virtue of the said Act, the Cantonment Act,

A.P. Sarpanches Association and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Election

Acts : Andhra Pradesh Legislative Council Act, 2005 - Sections 4; Representation of People Act, 1950 - Sections 15, 16, 18, 22, 23, 27, 27(1) and 27(2); Andhra Pradesh Panchayat Raj Act, 1994 - Sections 2(17), 2(18), 2(23), 2(45), 6, 8, 11, 12, 14(1), 45, 117, 140, 148, 148(1), 149(1), 150, 151, 161, 177(1), 177(2), 177(3), 178, 179, 192 and 222; Representation of People (Amendment) Act, 1963; Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Act, 1955 - Sections 1A, 1B, 1C, 5 and 8 to 12; Andhra Pradesh Municipalities Act, 1965 - Sections 8 to 12; Cantonments Act, 1924; Cantonments Act, 2006; Municipal Corporations Act, 1994; Andhra Pradesh Districts (Formation) Act, 1974 - Sections 3; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 169, 169(1), 171, 171(1) to 171(4), 243, 243A, 243B, 243E, 243G, 243K, 243P and 243Q

Reported in : AIR2007AP273; 2007(4)ALD783; 2007(5)ALT707

Cantonment Boards owe their existence to the Cantonments Act, 1924 (The 1924 Act has been repealed by the Cantonments Act, 2006), and Zilla Parishads and Mandal Parishads owe their existence to the Andhra Pradesh Panchayat Raj Act, 1994. Section … are purely based on the resolution passed by the Legislative Assembly of the State in terms of Article 169(1) of the Constitution of India, and the provisions of the 2005 Act cannot be struck down by invoking

Sunil Kumar Kori and Anr. Vs. Gopal Das Kabra and Ors.Etc.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Election

the interim directions in the said Writ Petitions a substantial number of illegally constructed houses were demolished. The Cantonments Act, 2006 re-enacted the existing Act of 1924 after taking into consideration the recommendations made by the Standing Committee of … of 2013 was closed on 17.02.2014. A notification dated 05.03.2015 was issued by the Government of India under Section 15 of the Cantonment Act, 2006 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) directing elections to be conducted to … SLP (C) No.26491 of 2015 was disposed of by this Court on 16.11.2015 directing the Cantonment Board to approach the High Court by filing a

Dr. K. Babu Vs. Cantonment Executive Officer and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : CivilProperty

Acts : Cantonments Act, 1924 - Sections 2, 2(4), 179, 181, 181A, 181(3), 194 and 194(2); Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 16; Cantonments (Amendment) Act, 2006 - Sections 261; Hyderabad Municipal Corporations Act, 1955; Aircraft Act

Reported in : 2008(2)ALD330

Act', for the purpose of convenience) and also had drawn the attention to the corresponding provisions under the Cantonments Act, 2006 (Act 41 of 2006). The learned Counsel would contend that the objections raised in the counter-affidavit are not … is filed by the first respondent.Sri P.R. Prasad, learned Counsel representing the petitioner, had taken this Court through Sections 2(4) and 194 of the Cantonments Act, 1924 (for short hereinafter called 'the Act', for the purpose of … purchased the same from Co-operative Society under a registered sale deed, dated 16.8.1982 bearing Document No. 2173 of 1982, Book No. 1, Vol. No.588 and

P.A. Mangalam Vs. the Chief Executive Officer, Chennai and Another

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Limited. The petitioner submitted an application to erect, re-erect and alter a building under Section 235 of the Cantonments Act, 2006 (Form A) on 28.12.2011 in respect of the property situated at No.9, GST Road, St.Thomas Mount, Chennai 600 … the petitioner's existing building and committing any act of waste in No.9, G.S.T. Road, St. Thomas Mount, Chennai 16.) 1. This Writ Petition is filed seeking to forbear the respondents, their men, agents, servants or subordinates or

Manoharan G. Vs. Bank of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Bank of Maharashtra Conduct Regulations, 1976 - Regulation 3

Reported in : 2002(4)ALD122; 2006(3)ALT76; (2002)IIILLJ270AP

Matched in: Citation 2002(4)ALD122; 2006(3)ALT76; (2002)IIILLJ270AP

Smt.Komal Rugwani. Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Service

Acts : Bombay Primary Education Act, 1947 - Sections 39(2), 39, 40, 8, 9(1) ; Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools Regulation Act, 1977 (MEPS) - Sections 9, 2(11), 2(25), 2(24), 2(21), 2(20)

of the Act. On this background, we come to the schools run by the Cantonment Board. 19. The Cantonments Act, 2006 has recently come into force from 13-9-2006 and has repealed the earlier Cantonments Act, 1924. "Cantonment" is defined … employed in a private primary school recognised by a body or officer referred to in sub-section (2) of section 39 of the Bombay Primary Education Act, 1947 can approach the Tribunal under section 9 of the MEPS … year 1977 and it received assent of the President of India on 16th March, 1978 and it is first published in the Maharashtra Government Gazette

Chief Executive Officer, Cantonment Board Vs. Tenzing Gopu Lama and Et ...

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Criminal

the offences are non-cognizable and bailable one. The same offence has been brought under the new enactment, The Cantonments Act, 2006 with the same nature of punishment.7. To resolve the legal controversy, it is also necessary to reproduce Section

Kosuru Kalinga Maharaju Vs. Kosuru Kaikamma

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 16, Rule 14

Reported in : 1999(6)ALD789; 2000(2)ALT409

to suit as Court witness - Court can summon such witness after satisfing itself about its necessity. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … the first defendant who is the petitioner in this revision has filed IA No.476 of 1999 under Order 16 Rule 14 CPC requiring the Court below to summon the second plaintiff in the suit either as a

G. Sudhakar and 98 Others Vs. L.i.C. of India, Divisional Office, Saif ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 16(1)

Reported in : 1998(6)ALD527; 1998(6)ALT147

legal justification and not on generosity of Judge - held, petitioner violated fundamental right guaranteed to others. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … Orissa High Court in Pramod Bank v. Registrar, Orissa University of Agriculture and Technology and others, 1998 Lab.I.C. 1694.4. Clause (1) of Article 16 of the Constitution of India mandates that there shall be equality of opportunity