Advanced Search Results

Queen-empress Vs. Lal and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : (1895)ILR17All166

paid, be refunded. Act No. XLV of 1860 (Indian Penal Code), Sections 159, 160 - Affray--'Public place.' - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.

Kishan Prasad Palaypu Vs. Registrar of Companies

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : CompanyCriminal

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 5, 43A, 73(2), 113(2), 159, 160, 161, 162, 162(1), 162(2), 168, 205A(1), 210, 220, 220(1), 220(2), 220(3) and 610; Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act; Mines Act; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 468, 472 and 482

Reported in : [2007]139CompCas536(AP); [2008]83SCL376(AP)

company for the offence alleged and is governed by Section 472 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … the like punishment as is provided by Section 162 for a default in complying with the provisions of Section 159, Section 160 or Section 161.Section 472. Continuing offence.--In the case of a continuing offence, a fresh period of

Vinod Baid Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : CompanyCriminal

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 53, 66, 79, 113, 113(1), 113(2), 133, 150, 159, 160, 161, 162, 162(1), 166, 209A(1), 234 and 598; Mines Act; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 468, 468(2), 469(1), 472 and 482; Company Law

Reported in : [2007]139CompCas324(AP); [2007]78SCL313(AP)

is allowed.13. This Court acknowledges the valuable assistance rendered by Sri O. Kailashnath Reddy, learned amicus curiae. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … not a continuing offence as defined under Section 472 of the Criminal Procedure Code. He would refer to Section 159 of the Companies Act which requires every company to file, before the Registrar of Companies, an annual return

Murli Dhar Vs. Babu Ram and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Tenancy

Reported in : AIR1920All162; (1920)ILR42All311; 55Ind.Cas.74

(II of 1901), Section 159 - U.P. Land Revenue Act (III of 1901), Section 144--'Co-sharer,' meaning of. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.

Dantuluri Ranga Devi Vs. Registrar of Companies and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : CriminalCompany

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 5, 159, 161, 162, 166 and 210; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 472; Negotiable Instruments Act - Sections 138 and 141

Reported in : [2007]135CompCas599(AP); [2007]78SCL242(AP)

also the director and officer in charge of the company. 5. The criminal petition is accordingly dismissed. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … 162 of the Companies Act, 1956 (for short 'the Act') for non-filing of returns as required under Sections 159 and 161 of the Act, the said C. C. No. 280 of 2002, has been taken on file

Chhakauri Khan Vs. Pir Bakhsh Khan and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Civil

Reported in : (1909)ILR31All279

II of 1901 (Agra Tenancy Act), Section 159--Code of Civil Procedure (Act XIV of 1882). Section 310A--Appeal--Jurisdiction. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.

Mr. Jitendra Chandrakant Mehta Vs. Shamrock Impex Pvt. Ltd. Through It ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 2, 156(3), 159, 190, 195, 195(1), 340, 463, 464, 465, 471, 475, 476 and 485; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 461, 471 and 476

Reported in : 2006CriLJ3131; 2006(4)MhLj355

Matched in: Citation 2006CriLJ3131; 2006(4)MhLj355

Adi Dara Patel and Others Vs. S. R. Jondhale and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Union territory or within the local limits of a cantonment declared as such under section 3 of the Cantonments Act, 1924 (2 of 1924), means the State Government. 157. The submission of Mr. Chidambaram is that assuming everything … of India, calling for the records, papers and proceedings pertaining to :- (i) The order dated 30th November, 2006 under section 8(4) of the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 (for short the ULC Act ). … interfered with, but that chamber summons of the State Government is dismissed. 159. Then, there is an alternate argument that the Court Receiver holds possession

Hazari Ram and ors. Vs. Firm Umrao Singh Sewati Lal and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Banking Civil

Reported in : AIR1946All512

try and decide the whole suit. The plaintiffs petitioners are entitled to their costs in this court. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … bags thus received by the plaintiffs came only to 846 and that thus the defendants failed to supply 159 bags out of the 1005 bags which they had contracted to supply. It is alleged in the plaint,

A.P. State Financial Corporation Vs. Mopeds India Limited (In Liquidat ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Company

Acts : Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 124 to 127, 446, 528, 529 and 529A; State Financial Corporations Act - Sections 29 and 44; Books Evidence Act, 1918; Representation of the People Act, 1951 - Sections 116A; Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 - Rules 147, 148, 149, 151, 154, 156, 159 and 164; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 96 - Order 49

Reported in : [2005]124CompCas833(AP); [2006]65SCL38(AP)

Matched in: Citation [2005]124CompCas833(AP); [2006]65SCL38(AP)