Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: cantonments act 2006 section 156 · Page 1 of about 40 results (0.028 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Aug 01 2002

Bandi Pandu Vs. Kola Balaji Varma and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Aug-01-2002

Subject : CriminalBanking

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 156(3), 200 and 482; Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Sections 138; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 420

Reported in : 2002(2)ALT(Cri)417; II(2003)BC93

under Section 420 of Indian Penal Code - proceedings initiated under Section 420 liable to be quashed. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … of theNegotiable Instruments Act (for short 'N.I. Act') and Section 420, IPC. The same was forwarded under Section 156(3), Cr.P.C to the police station, Avanigadda for investigation and report. The Police, Avanigadda, registered it as Crime No.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 08 2002

G. Sri Hari Vs. Nandkishore Lahoti and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Oct-08-2002

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Negotiable Instruments Act - Sections 138; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 420; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 156(3), 191 and 210

Reported in : 2002(2)ALD(Cri)646; 2002(2)ALT(Cri)556; 2003CriLJ643

both cases to be clubbed and not to be quashed as it would cause prejudice to respondent. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … Act and Section 420 I.P.C. The learned Magistrate referred the said complaint to the police, Geesukonda P.S. under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. for investigation and the same was registered as Crime No. 152 of 1995 under Section 420 I.P.C.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 07 2002

Mohd. GyasuddIn Vs. Jahangir Karanjaiah and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Oct-07-2002

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 120B, 420 and 498A; Dowry Prohibition Act - Sections 6; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 156(3) and 161

Reported in : 2002(2)ALD(Cri)659; 2003(1)ALT(Cri)1; 2003CriLJ966

was never hidden from petitioner and his family - no question of false representation so petition dismissed. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … and Section 6 of Dowry Prohibition act, was referred by the learned Magistrate to the police under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. for investigation. After investigation the police laid a charge sheet for offences under Section 498A read with

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jan 17 1930

Sri Ram Chandra Naik Kalya Vs. Satya NaraIn and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jan-17-1930

Subject : Civil

Reported in : AIR1930All353; 124Ind.Cas.471

156, 158 - Suit for assessment of revenue under Chap. X--Land not assessed to revenue--Suit, maintainability of. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 13 2002

Deputy Chief Security Commissioner, Railway Protection Force, South Ce ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Nov-13-2002

Subject : Service

Acts : Railway Protection Force Rules - Rule 156

Reported in : 2002(6)ALD468

unauthorised absence - held, extreme punishment of dismissal for absentism not justified nor comparable to offence committed. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … also pointed out that the extreme penalty of dismissal could not be sustained firstly in terms of Rule 156(b)(iii) of the Railway Protection Force Rules, which states that in case the charge of unauthorised absence of an

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 18 2002

Central Warehousing Corporation, a Govt. of India Undertaking and anr. ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jun-18-2002

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Arbitration Act - Sections 28; Evidence Act - Sections 145 and 156

Reported in : I(2003)BC682

on record - held, Order of Trial Court not having illegality or legal infirmity needs no interference. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … a statement before the arbitrator. The learned Counsel also had drawn my attention to Section 145 and also Section 156 of the Indian Evidence Act in this regard. The learned Counsel further submitted that in cases of this

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 28 1956

Mongey Vs. Board of Revenue and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Feb-28-1956

Subject : Limitation

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Limitation Act, 1908 - Schedule - Article 156

Reported in : AIR1957All47

156 of Limitation Act, 1908 - period fixed for appeal - extension of period in special circumstances. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 31 1969

Gaya and ors. Vs. Ram Sahai

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Dec-31-1969

Subject : Limitation

Reported in : (1885)ILR7All107

5, Schedule ii, No. 156--Execution of decree--sale of property by decree-holder before obtaining possession--Decree-holder's right not forfeited. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 04 1906

Ram Charan Vs. Dip Singh and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jul-04-1906

Subject : Tenancy

Reported in : (1907)ILR29All15

Act), Sections 164 (2) and 156 - Lambardar and co-sharer--Liability of successor in office for uncollected profits. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 08 2004

J. Raghuraj Goud Vs. Sub-inspector of Police and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Dec-08-2004

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Andhra Pradesh Co-operative Societies Act; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 2, 154 to 176, 190, 190(1), 200 to 203 and 482; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 226; Criminal Law

Reported in : 2005(1)ALD(Cri)177; 2005(2)ALT601; 2005CriLJ1301

the matter for investigation and to put forward his grievance, if any. No order as to costs. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … its mind and in that view of the matter, it has to be treated as the one under Section 156(3)) of the Code. On this premise, it is contended that the investigation into the F.I.Rs. cannot at all

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial