Advanced Search Results

Ramchandra Gupta Vs. the Kanpur Iron Scrap Merchants Association Ltd. ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 155

Reported in : AIR1964All45

recorded even if the District Judge as a Company Judge had such power to record a compromise. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … arrived at between the parties in a case in respect of the rectification of register of members under Section 155 of the Indian Companies Act, 1956.2. The appellant Ram Chandra Gupta had in an auction in execution of

Betal Singh and anr. Vs. State

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Defence of India Rules, 1962 - Rules 125 and 155

Reported in : AIR1965All78; 1965CriLJ137

relevant rule is not notified accused entitled to bail because restriction contained in rule is not applicable. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … to be guilty of the offence. We have heard learned counsel and have looked into the matter. Rule 155 of the Defence of India Rules is applicable only to those cases where the Central Government or the

Shyamlal Sharma Vs. King Emperor

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1949CriLJ719

this application in revision. The applicant is on bail. He must surrender and serve out his sentence. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … in which he stated that Ram Prakash had agreed to accept a bribe and asked for permission under Section 155 (2), Criminal P. C, to investigate the case. He then went on to state that the bribe would

Shyamlal Sharma Vs. King-emperor

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : AIR1949All483

this application in revision. The applicant is on bail. He must surrender and serve out his sentence. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … in which he stated that Ram Prakash had agreed to accept a bribe and asked for permission under Section 155 (2), Criminal P.C., to investigate the case. He then went on to state that the bribe would be

Mahendra Kumar JaIn Vs. Federal Chemical Works Ltd. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 155

Reported in : [1965]35CompCas651(All)

petition is, therefore, dismissed. Under the circumstances of the case, I make no order as to costs. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … Satish Chandra, J. 1. This is an application under Section 155 of the Companies Act, 1956, for the rectification of the share register of the Federal Chemical Works, Ghaziabad

R. Kamala Vs. Shaik Mohd. Ghouse and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 155 and 173

Reported in : 2004ACJ2112; 2004(2)ALT8

the matter next week for hearing before the appropriate court.19. Accordingly the L.P.A. is allowed. No costs. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … for the claimant-appellant contended that as per section 102 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1939, which is corresponding to section 155 of the new Act of 1988, even after the death of the insured, subsequent to the accident and

Udarapu Chandrasekhar and ors. Vs. the State of A.P., Rep. by Its P.P.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 482; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 155(2), 156(1), 379, 406 and 482

Reported in : 2003(1)ALD(Cri)301; 2003(1)ALT(Cri)549

Sections 379 and 406 of Code of 1860 - held, petition cannot be allowed to quash proceedings. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … under Section 156(1) of the Code except under an order of a Magistrate within the purview of Section 155(2) of the Code. 3. Where the uncontroverted allegations made in the FIR or complaint and the evidence collected

Dipti Sen and Ors Vs. The State of Jharkhand and Anr

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Land Acquisition

it has been averred that a piece of land having an area of 0.10 acres situated at Mouza Cantonment under Thana No. 157, Khata No. 84 (now 84/358), Plot No. 415 was purchased in the name of … one Hiyalal Singh vide registered sale deed no. 1821 dated 25.01.1971. Allegation has been made that by suppressing actual facts and by conniving with the scribe made false statement in the sale deed and 0.15 acre or … “M/s Indian Oil Corporation Vs. NEPC India Ltd. & Ors.” reported in 2006(4) East Cr. C22(SC) as well as in the case of “Union of … the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Hazaribagh by which cognizance has been taken under Sections 147, 323, 504, 506 of I.P.C.3. A complaint case was instituted by … of a Magistrate within the purview of Section 155(2) of the Code. (3) Where the uncontroverted allegations

A.P. Civil Supplies Corpn. Ltd. Vs. Delta Oils and Facts Ltd.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 10E(5), 235, 235(2), 237, 297, 301 and 642(1)

Reported in : [2007]73SCL242(AP)

as to make necessary investigation as to its affairs.34. The Company Appeal is accordingly allowed. No costs. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.

Oberoi Constructions Private Limited a Company Registered Under the Co ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Environment

Acts : Aircrafts Act; Bombay Municipal Corporation Act 1888 - Sections 354A; Bombay Town Planning Act, 1954 - Sections 3(1), 4(1), 9 and 10(1); Cantonment Act, 1910; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 5; Constitution (42nd Amendment) Act, 1976 - Sections 57; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 21, 48A, 51A, 141, 226, 227, 245, 246, 246(1), 300A and 372(1); Development Control Regulations, 1991;Evidence Act - Sections 114; Forest Act, 1865 - Sections 34A and 38; Forest Act, 1878; Forest Conservation Act, 1980; Government of India Act 1935; Greater Bombay Laws and the Bombay High Court (Declaration of Limits) Act, 1945; Indian Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 1, 2, 2A, 3 to 26, 34., 34A, 35, 35(1), 35(3), 35(4), 36, 36A, 36B, 36C, 37 and 38; Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 11A; Limitat

Reported in : 2008(3)ALLMR546; 2008(3)BomCR408; (2008)110BOMLR951

Matched in: Advocate F.S.Nariman, Adv. and ;Aspi Chinoy, Sr. Adv., i/b., ;Mahimtura and Co. in Writ Petition No. 1957, 2196, 2937 of 2006, ;J.J.Bhatt, Sr. Adv., ;Anjali Chandurkar, Adv., i/b., ;Kanga and Co. in Writ Petit Ravi Kadam, Adv. General and K.R. Belosey, G.P. K.K. Singhavi, Sr. Adv. with Priti Purandare, Adv. for respondent Municipal Corporation.in Writ Petition Nos. 1957 2937, 2093, 2111, 2930, 2985, 2752, 2