Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: cantonments act 2006 section 150 · Page 1 of about 53 results (0.050 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Feb 08 2007

A.P. Sarpanches Association and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Feb-08-2007

Subject : Election

Acts : Andhra Pradesh Legislative Council Act, 2005 - Sections 4; Representation of People Act, 1950 - Sections 15, 16, 18, 22, 23, 27, 27(1) and 27(2); Andhra Pradesh Panchayat Raj Act, 1994 - Sections 2(17), 2(18), 2(23), 2(45), 6, 8, 11, 12, 14(1), 45, 117, 140, 148, 148(1), 149(1), 150, 151, 161, 177(1), 177(2), 177(3), 178, 179, 192 and 222; Representation of People (Amendment) Act, 1963; Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Act, 1955 - Sections 1A, 1B, 1C, 5 and 8 to 12; Andhra Pradesh Municipalities Act, 1965 - Sections 8 to 12; Cantonments Act, 1924; Cantonments Act, 2006; Municipal Corporations Act, 1994; Andhra Pradesh Districts (Formation) Act, 1974 - Sections 3; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 169, 169(1), 171, 171(1) to 171(4), 243, 243A, 243B, 243E, 243G, 243K, 243P and 243Q

Reported in : AIR2007AP273; 2007(4)ALD783; 2007(5)ALT707

Cantonment Boards owe their existence to the Cantonments Act, 1924 (The 1924 Act has been repealed by the Cantonments Act, 2006), and Zilla Parishads and Mandal Parishads owe their existence to the Andhra Pradesh Panchayat Raj Act, 1994. Section … territorial constituencies :-(1) One member shall be elected to the Mandal Parishad from each territorial constituency specified in Section 150 by the method of secret ballot, from among persons who are registered voters in the Mandal Parishad.(2) For

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 25 2002

Prathima Educational Society Vs. Government of India and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Sep-25-2002

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Indian Medical Council Act, 1965 - Sections 10A

Reported in : 2002(6)ALD338

students by team of expert deputed of grant of permission - reduction of annual intake not valid. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … such place was Karimnagar. The petitioner, intending to establish a medicul college at Karimnagar with an intake of 150 students under the name and style of 'Prathima Institute of Medical Sciences' (for short, 'the medical college') has

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 27 2002

Secretary to Government of India, Ministry of Labour and anr. Vs. Regi ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Dec-27-2002

Subject : Service

Acts : Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972 - Rule 30 and 30(2); Labour Officers (Central Pool) Recruitment and Conditions of Service Rules, 1951 - Rule 8(2); Assistant Labour Commissioner (Central) and CLS Rules, 1987

Reported in : 2003(1)ALD773; 2003(2)ALT190

for benefit of added service - held, CAT has wrongly applied Rule 30 (2) in allowing application. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jan 17 1930

Sri Ram Chandra Naik Kalya Vs. Satya NaraIn and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jan-17-1930

Subject : Civil

Reported in : AIR1930All353; 124Ind.Cas.471

156, 158 - Suit for assessment of revenue under Chap. X--Land not assessed to revenue--Suit, maintainability of. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … learned counsel on behalf of the appellant-plaintiff, that his case came under Section 156, Act 2 of 1901. Section 150 lays down that the proprietor of a mahal or part of a mahal may sue to resume possession

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 27 2009

Dr. Deepak Agrawal Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Range-i a ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Feb-27-2009

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2009)222CTR(All)625; [2009]183TAXMAN199(All)

for all the reason stated above, there is no merit in this petition. It is, accordingly, dismissed. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … notice issued under Section 147 of the Act for reopening of the assessment under Section 147 read with Section 150(1) of the Act are bad in law inasmuch as the provisions of Section 150(1) are not applicable as

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 24 2008

Oberoi Constructions Private Limited a Company Registered Under the Co ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-24-2008

Subject : Environment

Acts : Aircrafts Act; Bombay Municipal Corporation Act 1888 - Sections 354A; Bombay Town Planning Act, 1954 - Sections 3(1), 4(1), 9 and 10(1); Cantonment Act, 1910; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 5; Constitution (42nd Amendment) Act, 1976 - Sections 57; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 21, 48A, 51A, 141, 226, 227, 245, 246, 246(1), 300A and 372(1); Development Control Regulations, 1991;Evidence Act - Sections 114; Forest Act, 1865 - Sections 34A and 38; Forest Act, 1878; Forest Conservation Act, 1980; Government of India Act 1935; Greater Bombay Laws and the Bombay High Court (Declaration of Limits) Act, 1945; Indian Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 1, 2, 2A, 3 to 26, 34., 34A, 35, 35(1), 35(3), 35(4), 36, 36A, 36B, 36C, 37 and 38; Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 11A; Limitat

Reported in : 2008(3)ALLMR546; 2008(3)BomCR408; (2008)110BOMLR951

Matched in: Advocate F.S.Nariman, Adv. and ;Aspi Chinoy, Sr. Adv., i/b., ;Mahimtura and Co. in Writ Petition No. 1957, 2196, 2937 of 2006, ;J.J.Bhatt, Sr. Adv., ;Anjali Chandurkar, Adv., i/b., ;Kanga and Co. in Writ Petit Ravi Kadam, Adv. General and K.R. Belosey, G.P. K.K. Singhavi, Sr. Adv. with Priti Purandare, Adv. for respondent Municipal Corporation.in Writ Petition Nos. 1957 2937, 2093, 2111, 2930, 2985, 2752, 2

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 24 2006

Vinod Baid Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Oct-24-2006

Subject : CompanyCriminal

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 53, 66, 79, 113, 113(1), 113(2), 133, 150, 159, 160, 161, 162, 162(1), 166, 209A(1), 234 and 598; Mines Act; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 468, 468(2), 469(1), 472 and 482; Company Law

Reported in : [2007]139CompCas324(AP); [2007]78SCL313(AP)

is allowed.13. This Court acknowledges the valuable assistance rendered by Sri O. Kailashnath Reddy, learned amicus curiae. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … a penalty, the liability for which continues until the rule or its requirement is obeyed or complied with'. Section 150 of the Companies Act does not impose any liability which so continues. The offence on the breach thereof

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 31 1969

Wilkinson Vs. Shields

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Dec-31-1969

Subject : ContractCivil

Reported in : (1887)ILR9All398

IX of 1872 (Contract Act), Section 150, 151, 152--High Court's powers of revision--Civil Procedure Code, Section 622. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 05 1990

M/S. Shyam Gas Company Vs. State of U.P. and Others

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Dec-05-1990

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 12, 14, 226 and 229; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 23; Essential Commodities Act, 1955 - Sections 3 and 7; Uttar Pradesh Essential Commodities (Display of Prices and Stocks and Control of Supply and Distribution) Order, 1977; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 482; Uttar Pradesh Accommodation Requisition Act, 1947 - Sections 3(1) and (2); Arbitration Act, 1940

Reported in : AIR1991All129; (1991)1UPLBEC355

unconscionable - such a contract would be void as what is unconscionable is opposed to public policy. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … Limited L.P.G. bottling plant at Shakur Basti, seven out of twenty cylinders were found to be underweight by 150 gm. to one kg. Further, if anything wrong in addition was found by the audit party nothing was

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 21 2006

Basanthilal Aggarwal and anr. Vs. P.S. Bhamdari and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Dec-21-2006

Subject : Property

Acts : Andhra Pradesh Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act, 1982 - Sections 2, 4 and 8; Transfer of Property Act - Sections 82 and 92; Delhi Rent Control Act - Sections 21; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 34

Reported in : 2007(3)ALD805; 2007(2)ALT566

prayed for in L.G.C.No. 258 of 1995. However, there shall be no separate order as to costs. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … establish the plea of adverse possession in respect of any portion of the application schedule properties.29. In para 150, the Special Court observed that the respondents fully satisfied the definition of 'land grabber' inasmuch as they had

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial