Advanced Search Results

Jitendra Yadav and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Election

Reported in : AIR2009MP92

by the Government of India, Ministry of Defence, New Delhi, under Sub-section (1) of Section 15 of the Cantonments Act, 2006 (for short 'the Act'), 9th November 2008 was fixed as the date on which the elections to the

Smt. Shobha Kailash Bonekar Vs. Cantonment Executive Officer, Cantonme ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : ServiceCivil

Acts : Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulations Act, 1977 - Sections 2(11), 2(20), 2(21), 2(25), 3, 3(1), 8, 9, 10, 10(2), 11 and 62; General Clauses Act; Maharashtra Secondary and Higher Secondary Education Boards Act, 1965 - Sections 6, 18 and 19; Bombay Primary Education Act, 1947; Maharashtra Zilla Parishads Act - Sections 2(26); Cantonments Act, 2006 - Sections 280; Cantonments Act, 1924; Constitution of India - Article 243P; Cantonment Fund Servants Rules, 1937 - Rules 2, 11, 12, 12A, 12(3), 13, 14 and 15

Reported in : AIR2008AP23; AIR2008Bom23(FB)

2(20) of the Act. On this background, we come to the schools run by the Cantonment Board.18. The Cantonments Act, 2006 has recently come into force from 13-9-2006 and has repealed the earlier Cantonments Act, 1924. 'Cantonment' is defined … and a further revision to the Central Government is provided under Rule 15. This mechanism has been existing since prior to coming into force of … by respondent No. 3 by filing Appeal No. 20 of 2005 before the School Tribunal at Solapur, under Section 9 of the Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulations Act, 1977 (for short, ''MEPS Act').

Sanjeev Bhatiani Vs. Union of India and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

No.2/DCB on different dates in respect of the subject premises under Sections 340, 248 and 320 of the Cantonments Act, 2006 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’), be quashed.3. Briefly stated the facts of the case are that the … that the orders passed by the respondent No.2/DCB on different dates in respect of the subject premises under Sections 340, 248 and 320 of the Cantonments Act, 2006 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’), be quashed.3. Briefly … 15 to 22 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW

A.P. Sarpanches Association and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Election

Acts : Andhra Pradesh Legislative Council Act, 2005 - Sections 4; Representation of People Act, 1950 - Sections 15, 16, 18, 22, 23, 27, 27(1) and 27(2); Andhra Pradesh Panchayat Raj Act, 1994 - Sections 2(17), 2(18), 2(23), 2(45), 6, 8, 11, 12, 14(1), 45, 117, 140, 148, 148(1), 149(1), 150, 151, 161, 177(1), 177(2), 177(3), 178, 179, 192 and 222; Representation of People (Amendment) Act, 1963; Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Act, 1955 - Sections 1A, 1B, 1C, 5 and 8 to 12; Andhra Pradesh Municipalities Act, 1965 - Sections 8 to 12; Cantonments Act, 1924; Cantonments Act, 2006; Municipal Corporations Act, 1994; Andhra Pradesh Districts (Formation) Act, 1974 - Sections 3; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 169, 169(1), 171, 171(1) to 171(4), 243, 243A, 243B, 243E, 243G, 243K, 243P and 243Q

Reported in : AIR2007AP273; 2007(4)ALD783; 2007(5)ALT707

Cantonment Boards owe their existence to the Cantonments Act, 1924 (The 1924 Act has been repealed by the Cantonments Act, 2006), and Zilla Parishads and Mandal Parishads owe their existence to the Andhra Pradesh Panchayat Raj Act, 1994. Section … (2) of the Representation of the People Act, 1950, Sections 2(17), (18), (23), (45), 8, 14(1), 148(1), 149(1), 151, 177(1), (2) and (3) and 179 of the 1994 Act, and Section 4 of the Legislative Council Act,

Sunil Kumar Kori and Anr. Vs. Gopal Das Kabra and Ors.Etc.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Election

the interim directions in the said Writ Petitions a substantial number of illegally constructed houses were demolished. The Cantonments Act, 2006 re-enacted the existing Act of 1924 after taking into consideration the recommendations made by the Standing Committee of … of 2013 was closed on 17.02.2014. A notification dated 05.03.2015 was issued by the Government of India under Section 15 of the Cantonment Act, 2006 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) directing elections to be conducted to Panchamarhi

Koppu Satyanarayana Vs. Cantonment Board

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Property

Acts : Cantonment Act, 2006 - Sections 122, 250 and 340; Cantonment Act, 1924 - Sections 179 and 181; Constitution of India - Article 14

Reported in : 2008(3)ALD443

period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.

Chief Executive Officer, Cantonment Board Vs. Tenzing Gopu Lama and Et ...

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Criminal

the offences are non-cognizable and bailable one. The same offence has been brought under the new enactment, The Cantonments Act, 2006 with the same nature of punishment.7. To resolve the legal controversy, it is also necessary to reproduce Section … India in the case of Krishnan v. Krishnaveni reported in (1997) 4 SCC 241 : 1997 Cri LJ 1519. The relevant observations of the Apex Court are as follows:The object of Section 483 and the purpose behind

Pratap Singh A. and ors. Vs. A.P. State Electricity Board and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Andhra Pradesh State Electricity Board Service Regulation - Rule 16; Draft Service Rules, 1960; Contract Act - Sections 23; Constitution of India - Article 24

Reported in : (2001)ILLJ973AP

ad-hoc basis during their minority - held, petitioners are entitle for regularisation subject to vacancy in factory. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.

Poosapati Appalanarasaiamma, Alias Varahalamma and ors. Vs. Vulli Syam ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : ContractProperty

Acts : Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 15, 16, 22 and 22(2)

Reported in : 2002(6)ALD215

for - refund of advance money cannot be granted in absence of specific prayer to that effect. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.

Godavari Polymers Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Agricultural Products Commissioner and ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : ContractConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 15(1), 226, 298 and 299

Reported in : 2004(1)ALD783; 2004(5)ALT599; 2005(1)CTLJ535(AP)

not suffer from any arbitrariness as petitioner failed to fulfill essential criteria laid down in EOI document. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.