Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: cantonments act 2006 section 148 · Page 1 of about 53 results (0.036 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Feb 08 2007

A.P. Sarpanches Association and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Feb-08-2007

Subject : Election

Acts : Andhra Pradesh Legislative Council Act, 2005 - Sections 4; Representation of People Act, 1950 - Sections 15, 16, 18, 22, 23, 27, 27(1) and 27(2); Andhra Pradesh Panchayat Raj Act, 1994 - Sections 2(17), 2(18), 2(23), 2(45), 6, 8, 11, 12, 14(1), 45, 117, 140, 148, 148(1), 149(1), 150, 151, 161, 177(1), 177(2), 177(3), 178, 179, 192 and 222; Representation of People (Amendment) Act, 1963; Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Act, 1955 - Sections 1A, 1B, 1C, 5 and 8 to 12; Andhra Pradesh Municipalities Act, 1965 - Sections 8 to 12; Cantonments Act, 1924; Cantonments Act, 2006; Municipal Corporations Act, 1994; Andhra Pradesh Districts (Formation) Act, 1974 - Sections 3; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 169, 169(1), 171, 171(1) to 171(4), 243, 243A, 243B, 243E, 243G, 243K, 243P and 243Q

Reported in : AIR2007AP273; 2007(4)ALD783; 2007(5)ALT707

Cantonment Boards owe their existence to the Cantonments Act, 1924 (The 1924 Act has been repealed by the Cantonments Act, 2006), and Zilla Parishads and Mandal Parishads owe their existence to the Andhra Pradesh Panchayat Raj Act, 1994. Section … 27(1) and (2) of the Representation of the People Act, 1950, Sections 2(17), (18), (23), (45), 8, 14(1), 148(1), 149(1), 151, 177(1), (2) and (3) and 179 of the 1994 Act, and Section 4 of the Legislative

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 29 2003

Gandeay Shravan Kumar Vs. D. Srinivasulu (Died) Per Lrs. and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jul-29-2003

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 148 and 151; High Court Appellate Side Rules - Rule 12

Reported in : 2004(1)ALD639

applicable in such case - matter must be considered in accordance with Section 151 - delay condoned. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … maintainability of the petition for condonation of delay of more than thirty days in view of amendment to Section 148 CPC, which reads as follows:'Where any period is fixed or granted by the Court for the doing of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 31 1969

NaraIn Das Vs. Gobind Ram

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Dec-31-1969

Subject : Tenancy

Reported in : (1887)ILR9All394

decree for rent against such party--Question of title--Act XII of 1881 (N.-W. P. Rent Act) Section 148. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Feb 24 2004

Jhunjhunwala Vanaspati Ltd. Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax ( ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Feb-24-2004

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income tax Act, 1961 - Sections 148

Reported in : (2004)189CTR(All)46; [2004]266ITR664(All)

per precedents notice under Section 148 cannot be issued when assessment proceedings are pending - notice quashed. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 11 2001

Chinawaltair Colony House Owners Welfare Association Vs. Commissioner, ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Oct-11-2001

Subject : Civil

Acts : Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Act, 1956 - Sections 148

Reported in : AIR2002AP175

in public trust - held, Municipality cannot alienate public property without complying procedure provided under Section 148. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 31 1969

Baldeo Ram and ors. Vs. Ganga Prasad and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Dec-31-1969

Subject : CivilProperty

Reported in : (1888)ILR10All347

not conclusive in civil suit for declaration of right to and possession of land--Limitation for such suit - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … the plaintiffs to recover certain arrears of rent from Mital, and again Ganga Prasad intervened, this time under section 148 of the Rent Act, the question thus raised for determination again being, who had in good faith received

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 02 1998

G.B. Bros. and Konda Rajagopala Chetty Beedi Factory (P.) Ltd. Vs. Inc ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jan-02-1998

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 80HH, 80HH(7), 80HHC(7), 147 and 148

Reported in : [2004]267ITR774(AP)

draw that inference for reducing deduction to which assessee entitled - impugned notice liable to be quashed. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … 263 of the Act. Finding both these courses to be untenable, the impugned notices are being issued under Section 148 of the Income-tax Act alleging that the assessee has failed to disclose fully and truly all the material

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 12 1913

Jagarnath Sahi Vs. Kamta Prasad Upadhya

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Dec-12-1913

Subject : Civil

Reported in : (1914)ILR36All77

fulfilled-Court competent either to extend time for compliance with condition or to pass a fresh conditional order. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … a case as that of Suranjan Singh v. Ram Bahal Lal (1) in which it was held that Section 148 of the Civil Procedure Code does not authorize the court to extend the time fixed by the decree

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 14 1961

indra Kumar Vs. State of U.P. and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Nov-14-1961

Subject : Civil

Acts : Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 148

Reported in : AIR1963All70

contract - no entrustment - no liability of the roadways bus - no damages to be given. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … must be held responsible as a bailee. This contention of the learned counsel cannot be accepted.3. According to Section 148 of the Indian Contract Act a bailment is the delivery of goods by one person to another for

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 04 1910

Babu Batuk Nath Vs. Musammat Munni and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jun-04-1910

Subject : Property

Reported in : 7Ind.Cas.36

Section 93--Civil Procedure Code (Act V of 1908), Sections 148, 151--Extension of time fixed in a decree. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial