Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: cantonments act 2006 section 140 · Page 1 of about 33 results (0.031 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Feb 08 2007

A.P. Sarpanches Association and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Feb-08-2007

Subject : Election

Acts : Andhra Pradesh Legislative Council Act, 2005 - Sections 4; Representation of People Act, 1950 - Sections 15, 16, 18, 22, 23, 27, 27(1) and 27(2); Andhra Pradesh Panchayat Raj Act, 1994 - Sections 2(17), 2(18), 2(23), 2(45), 6, 8, 11, 12, 14(1), 45, 117, 140, 148, 148(1), 149(1), 150, 151, 161, 177(1), 177(2), 177(3), 178, 179, 192 and 222; Representation of People (Amendment) Act, 1963; Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Act, 1955 - Sections 1A, 1B, 1C, 5 and 8 to 12; Andhra Pradesh Municipalities Act, 1965 - Sections 8 to 12; Cantonments Act, 1924; Cantonments Act, 2006; Municipal Corporations Act, 1994; Andhra Pradesh Districts (Formation) Act, 1974 - Sections 3; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 169, 169(1), 171, 171(1) to 171(4), 243, 243A, 243B, 243E, 243G, 243K, 243P and 243Q

Reported in : AIR2007AP273; 2007(4)ALD783; 2007(5)ALT707

Cantonment Boards owe their existence to the Cantonments Act, 1924 (The 1924 Act has been repealed by the Cantonments Act, 2006), and Zilla Parishads and Mandal Parishads owe their existence to the Andhra Pradesh Panchayat Raj Act, 1994. Section … Zilla Parishads is the same. This is clearly evinced from a bare reading of Sections 8, 11, 12, 140, 151 and 179 of the 1994 Act. It is, thus, evident that while the Municipal Corporations, Municipalities and

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 09 1964

Municipal Board Vs. District Magistrate and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Dec-09-1964

Subject : Municipal Tax

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Municipalities Act, 1916 - Sections 140(1)

Reported in : AIR1966All37

calculation of annual value - held, building for public need fall in clause (a) and clause (b). - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … petition under Article 226 of the Constitution raises a short but interesting question as to the interpretation of Section 140 of the U. P. Municipalities Act. 2. One Lala Jagdish Prasad, the second respondent, owns a building which

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 03 2002

Branch Manager, New India Assurance Company Limited Vs. Puppala Guruva ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Sep-03-2002

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 140

Reported in : 2005ACJ133; 2002(5)ALD674; 2003(2)ALT204

held liable to pay compensation even if accident occurred due to driver's negligence not possessing valid license. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … of the lorry was not having valid licence, restricted the liability of the Insurance Company to Rs.25,000/- under Section 140 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (for short, the Act). The owner of the lorry was held liable

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Oct 28 1999

Lakhan Singh Niranjan Vs. Ram Kesh

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Oct-28-1999

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 140

Reported in : I(2000)ACC287; 2000ACJ575; 2000(1)AWC26

contributory negligence - proof of accident, involvement of vehicle and identity of owner essential to establish fault. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … D. K. Seth, J.1. The award under Section 140 of the Motor Vehicle Act passed by the learned Special Judge, Oral in Original Suit No. 86 of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 29 2003

A. Visweswara Rao Vs. United India Insurance Co. Ltd.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Oct-29-2003

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 140 and 146

Reported in : I(2004)ACC606; 2005ACJ1517; 2004(1)ALD442

not liable to pay compensation to owner of vehicle - held, compensation cannot be granted to petitioner. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … the present civil revision petition.8. It is not in dispute that the petitioner filed the O.P. under Sections 140 and 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 claiming a sum of Rs. 6,256-65 Ps. for damages caused

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 28 1919

Barkat-un-nissa Begam Vs. Mahbub Ali Mian and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jul-28-1919

Subject : Contract

Reported in : (1920)ILR42All70

surety upon the mortgages redeemed--Limitation Act No. IX of 1908 (Indian Limitation Act), Schedule I, Article 185. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … the Act.16. We have now to consider the effect of Sections 140 and 141 of the Act.17. Under Section 140, it seems to us that when the surety has paid off the whole debt, he is entitled to

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 04 2006

Golepu Chandramouli and ors. Vs. G. Sreesailam and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Sep-04-2006

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 140, 140(2), 140(5), 141, 163A, 166 and 166(2); Workmen's Compensation Act

Reported in : 2007(2)ALD69

and necessary steps shall be taken for adjustment thereof. There shall be no order as to costs. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … and his minor son-Uma Shankar died.3. The third appellant filed O.P. Nos. 719 and 720 of 1997 under Section 140 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (for short 'the Act') before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal-cum-II Additional District

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 23 1996

New India Assurance Co. Ltd. and anr. Vs. Salapuriappa and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Feb-23-1996

Subject : Motor Vehicle

Reported in : 1997ACJ914

District Judge, Madanapalle awarding Rs. 15,000/- under Section 92-A of the old Act is upheld. No costs. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … the amendment'. It is obvious that the learned single Judge was referring to the change brought about by Section 140 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (for short 'the new Act') which came into effect from 1.7.89 repealing

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 23 1996

New India Assurance Co. Ltd. and ors. Vs. Salapuriappa and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Feb-23-1996

Subject : InsuranceMotor Vehicles

Reported in : I(1997)ACC167

District Judge, Madanapalle awarding Rs. 15,000/- under Section 92-A of the Old Act is upheld. No costs. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … the amendment'. It is obvious that the learned Single Judge was referring to the change brought about by Section 140 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 ('the New Act' for short) which came into effect from 1.7.1989 repealing

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 15 2006

Gosala Ramadevi and ors. Vs. P. Sivanarayana and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Dec-15-2006

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 140 and 166; Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 - Sections 3

Reported in : 2007(3)ALD634

also not entitled to any compensation. Parties are directed to bear their own costs in this appeal. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … the person who suffered on account of such accident. It was held that 'no fault liability' envisaged under Section 140 of the Act is distinguishable from the rule of strict liability and that in cases not covered by

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial