Advanced Search Results

Sri Ramdas Motor Transport Ltd. and ors. Vs. Karedla Suryanarayana and ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 10E, 10E(6), 10F, 43A(1A), 163, 209, 219, 284, 397, 398 and 402; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 151 - Order 19; Company Law Board Regulations, 1991 - Regulation 44; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 59, 102 and 114; Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 - Rule 9

Reported in : [2002]110CompCas193(AP)

Committee of Chartered Accountants appointed by High Court to determine valuation of shares held by minority shareholders. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … more so without passing any orders on the prayer in the main petition as well as C. Under Section 102 of the Evidence Act the burden of proof in a suit or proceeding lies on that person who

Muppidi Dora Reddy Vs. Bollareddy Ramakrishna Reddy and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 64 - Order 21, Rules 64, 96, 98, 100 and 102; Transfer of Property Act - Sections 52

Reported in : AIR2003AP299

alleged was subsequent to filling of suit so hit by Rule 102 and doctrine of lis pendens. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.

Baru Mal and ors. Vs. Niadar

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Civil

Reported in : (1902)ILR24All153

trespasser a person who claimed to be entitled to the holding of a deceased occupancy tenant--Res judicata. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … made to the Revenue Courts was an application on plain paper, headed and marked as being one under Section 102 of Act No. XIX of 1873. No person was cited as a defendant: all that the application stated

Raja Narendra Bahadur Pal Vs. Bafati

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Tenancy

Reported in : AIR1923All50; (1923)ILR45All7

Courts--Jurisdiction--Rent payable in kind--Suit to recover rent in money where tenant has omitted to sow a crop. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … to the proper court.6. The plaintiff comes here in revision. It is strenuously argued, on his behalf, that Section 102(1) of the Act, read with Section 104 (having especial regard to the wording of Clause (4) enables a

Bisheshwar Prasad Gautam Vs. Dr. R.K. Agarwal

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 102 and 115; Uttar Pradesh Civil Laws (Amendment) Act, 1972

Reported in : AIR1977All103

Small Cause Court - even if not transferred nature of case retained - no second appeal allowed. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … a preliminary objection was taken on behalf of the respondent that no second appeal lay in view of Section 102 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The learned Single Judge, however, heard the appeal on the question that

Ablakh and anr. Vs. Bhagirathi

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Civil

Reported in : (1887)ILR9All427

in this respect. Appeal - Dismissal of suit for non-appearance of plaintiff--Civil Procedure Code Sections 102, 103. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.

Rajesh Agarwal Vs. Union of India and ors

Court : Delhi

Subject : Right to Information

Acts : Cantonments Act, 2006 - Section 57; Right to Information Act (RTI), 2005

order dated 20th February 2009 whereby in exercise of its power to review under Section 57 of the Cantonments Act, 2006 („CA 2006) the Government of India („GOI) in the Ministry of Defence (MoD) (Respondent No.1) set aside a … storeys. They quote the cases of House No. 151, Ganj Bazar, Shop No. 332, Bridge Street, Shop Nos. 102 & 103, Dal Mandi, Shop Nos. 27-27A & 28-28A, Rangsaz Mohalla, Shop No. 158, Rangsaz Mohalla, B.No. 289,

Bonala Raju and anr. Vs. Sarupuru Sreenivasulu

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Civil

Acts : Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Sections 118; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 73 and 102

Reported in : 2006(1)ALD745; 2006(2)ALT202

Matched in: Citation 2006(1)ALD745; 2006(2)ALT202

Rishi Kesh Singh and ors. Vs. the State

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 3, 101, 104, 105 and 114; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 6, 76, 96 and 299; Constitution of India - Article 141

Reported in : AIR1970All51; 1970CriLJ132

is already available, quoting decisions from English Courts not required as decision of Supreme Court always prevails. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … 105, but this does not in any way absolve the prosecution of the burden laid on it by Section 102. The burden of proof, so far as the entire 'proceeding' is concerned, remains on the prosecution, even though

Gomi Bai and ors. Vs. Uma Rastogi and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : ContractCivil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 7, Rules 1 and 2 - Order 8, Rule 5(3); Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 15, 19, 20 and 22(1); Transfer of Property Act - Sections 54; Evidence Act - Sections 102

Reported in : 2005(2)ALD631

the file of the Court Principal Subordinate Judge, Ranga Reddy District, at Saroornagar, is dismissed with costs. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … the suit, the Court in its discretion may require the plaintiff to prove a fact. Further as per Section 102 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, the burden of proof in a suit lies on that person who