Advanced Search Results

Vikrampuri Co-operative House Building Society Ltd. Vs. Secunderabad C ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Civil

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Cantonment Act, 2006 - Sections 340 and 343

Reported in : 2007(3)ALD494; 2007(3)ALT192

WPMP Nos. 34100 and 34101 of 2006 filed by the petitioner for interim reliefs are also dismissed. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … ORDERG.S. Singhvi, C.J.1. In this petition, the petitioner has prayed for issue of a direction to Secunderabad Cantonment Board (for short,

Smt.T.M.Nagarani and ors Vs. Ms.Andhra Tiles

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Andhra Pradesh (AP) Buildings (Lease, Rent & Eviction) Control Act, 1960 - Sections 10(2)(i), 10(3)(iii)(a), 32(c); Cantonment Act, 2006 - Section 60, Chapter-III; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order XIV Rule 12

petitioners. In that case, the question was whether the expression 'Municipality in State' in Section 60 of the Cantonments Act, 1924 takes within its sweep the Hyderabad Municipal Corporation also. The issue, namely, whether the Cantonment was part … the control of the Central Government and being administered by separate Boards constituted under Chapter-III of the Cantonment Act, 2006. 3. Therefore, it cannot be said that the Secunderabad Cantonment area forms part of the Hyderabad Municipal Corporation … accordingly dismissed. As a sequel to dismissal of the civil revision petition, C.R.P.M.P.No.599 of 2012 shall stand disposed of as infructuous. Cantonment Act, 2006 -

B. Lakshman and anr. Vs. the Union of India (Uoi), Ministry of Defence ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : CivilElection

Acts : Cantonments Act, 1924 - Sections 16(1), 17 and 54; Cantonment Act, 2006 - Sections 1(3), 2, 10, 10(2), 12, 13, 13(1), 13(3), 13(4), 14, 28, 29, 30, 32, 34, 60, 360, 360(1) and 360(2); A.P. Municipalities Act, 1965 - Sections 62, 62(1) and 62(4); Constitution of India - Articles 14, 21, 243B, 243P, 243Q and 243S

Reported in : 2008(2)ALD429; 2008(1)ALT443

19.05.2006, which was notified by the Government of India under Section 16(1) of the Cantonments Act, 1924, the Cantonments Act 2006 (41 of 2006) has come into force w.e.f. 18.12.2006. By virtue of the said Act, the Cantonment Act, … officer Commanding-in-Chief, the Command, nominate in place of any military officer whom he is empowered to nominate under C.L.(e) of Sub-section (3), Clause (e) of Sub-section (4) or Clause (b) of Sub-section (5), any person, whether in

Smt. Shobha Kailash Bonekar Vs. Cantonment Executive Officer, Cantonme ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : ServiceCivil

Acts : Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulations Act, 1977 - Sections 2(11), 2(20), 2(21), 2(25), 3, 3(1), 8, 9, 10, 10(2), 11 and 62; General Clauses Act; Maharashtra Secondary and Higher Secondary Education Boards Act, 1965 - Sections 6, 18 and 19; Bombay Primary Education Act, 1947; Maharashtra Zilla Parishads Act - Sections 2(26); Cantonments Act, 2006 - Sections 280; Cantonments Act, 1924; Constitution of India - Article 243P; Cantonment Fund Servants Rules, 1937 - Rules 2, 11, 12, 12A, 12(3), 13, 14 and 15

Reported in : AIR2008AP23; AIR2008Bom23(FB)

2(20) of the Act. On this background, we come to the schools run by the Cantonment Board.18. The Cantonments Act, 2006 has recently come into force from 13-9-2006 and has repealed the earlier Cantonments Act, 1924. 'Cantonment' is defined … H.L. Gokhale, Acting C.J.1. Writ Petition No. 721 of 2006 is filed by a teacher working … by respondent No. 3 by filing Appeal No. 20 of 2005 before the School Tribunal at Solapur, under Section 9 of the Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulations Act, 1977 (for short, ''MEPS Act').

Dr. K. Babu Vs. Cantonment Executive Officer and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : CivilProperty

Acts : Cantonments Act, 1924 - Sections 2, 2(4), 179, 181, 181A, 181(3), 194 and 194(2); Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 16; Cantonments (Amendment) Act, 2006 - Sections 261; Hyderabad Municipal Corporations Act, 1955; Aircraft Act

Reported in : 2008(2)ALD330

Act', for the purpose of convenience) and also had drawn the attention to the corresponding provisions under the Cantonments Act, 2006 (Act 41 of 2006). The learned Counsel would contend that the objections raised in the counter-affidavit are not … is filed by the first respondent.Sri P.R. Prasad, learned Counsel representing the petitioner, had taken this Court through Sections 2(4) and 194 of the Cantonments Act, 1924 (for short hereinafter called 'the Act', for the purpose of

Sunil Kumar Kori and Anr. Vs. Gopal Das Kabra and Ors.Etc.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Election

the interim directions in the said Writ Petitions a substantial number of illegally constructed houses were demolished. The Cantonments Act, 2006 re-enacted the existing Act of 1924 after taking into consideration the recommendations made by the Standing Committee of … of 2013 was closed on 17.02.2014. A notification dated 05.03.2015 was issued by the Government of India under Section 15 of the Cantonment Act, 2006 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) directing elections to be conducted to

Vasavi Co-operative Urban Bank Limited Vs. Authority Appointed Under S ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Civil

Acts : Andhra Pradesh Shops and Establishments Act, 1988 - Sections 48, 48(1), 48(3), 73, 73(1) and 77; Andhra Pradesh Co-operative Societies Act, 1964 - Sections 32(7), 48(3) and 116C; Banking Regulation Act, 1949 - Sections 11(1), 22, 35A, 35A(1), 56 and 56(O); Andhra Pradesh Shops and Establishments Act, 1948 - Sections 48(1); Tamil Nadu Shops and Establishments Act, 1947; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 25J; Constitution of India - Articles 66 and 226

Reported in : 2007(2)ALD795; [2007(113)FLR748]

is liable to be dismissed and accordingly dismissed. However, in the circumstances of the case, no costs. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … by the respondents-workmen. In support of his contentions, he relied upon the judgment of the Supreme Court in C.V. Raman v. Management of Bank of India : (1988)IILLJ423aSC .8. Learned Counsel further submitted that keeping in view

Ramesh Chouksey Vs. the Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Limitation

Reported in : 2008(5)MPHT48

of 1951 is not applicable to elections to the Cantonment Board and that only the provisions of the Cantonments Act, 2006 (for short 'the Act of 2006') and the Rules of 2007 are applicable.11. Sub-section (1) of Section 29 … ORDERA.K. Patnaik, C.J.1. This is an appeal tiled under Section 2(1) of the M.P. Uchcha Nyayalaya (Khand Peeth Ko Appeal) Adhiniyam,

Mahesh Jain vs.delhi Cantonment Board and Anr

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

with the initiation of proceedings under Section 5B of the PP Act, proceedings under Section 248 of the Cantonments Act, 2006, also for demolition of unauthorised construction were also initiated; (iv) orders dated 31st July, 2012, 8th August, 2012

Rajbir Singh vs.commissioner of Police & Anr

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

No.2 for unauthorised construction and notice against the respondent No.2 was framed under Section 247 of the Cantonment Act, 2006 wherein he pleaded guilty and was sentenced to fine to the tune of ₹10,000/- and cost towards demolition … FIR was registered as a counterblast to the action taken by the petitioner of issuing notice to the Cantonment Board on 26th October, 2015 asking them to take action against the unauthorized construction done by respondent No.2