Advanced Search Results

B. Lakshman and anr. Vs. the Union of India (Uoi), Ministry of Defence ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : CivilElection

Acts : Cantonments Act, 1924 - Sections 16(1), 17 and 54; Cantonment Act, 2006 - Sections 1(3), 2, 10, 10(2), 12, 13, 13(1), 13(3), 13(4), 14, 28, 29, 30, 32, 34, 60, 360, 360(1) and 360(2); A.P. Municipalities Act, 1965 - Sections 62, 62(1) and 62(4); Constitution of India - Articles 14, 21, 243B, 243P, 243Q and 243S

Reported in : 2008(2)ALD429; 2008(1)ALT443

19.05.2006, which was notified by the Government of India under Section 16(1) of the Cantonments Act, 1924, the Cantonments Act 2006 (41 of 2006) has come into force w.e.f. 18.12.2006. By virtue of the said Act, the Cantonment Act,

Karansingh S/O Kachrusingh Kakas Vs. the Chief Executive Officer, Cant ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Cantonments Act, 2006 - Sections 31; Cantonment Electoral Rules, 2007 - Rule 5 and 5(1)

Reported in : 2008(3)ALLMR219; 2008(3)BomCR59; 2008(3)MhLj891

published a draft of Cantonment Electoral Rules, 2007, in exercise of powers conferred by Section 31 of the Cantonments Act, 2006. The Cantonment Board has also published a draft for division of cantonment into wards on the notice board … for division of cantonment into wards on the notice board as well as in the local newspapers on 10.9.2007 inviting objections and suggestions. After considering the objections and suggestions, the wards were formulated and taking into consideration

Jitendra Yadav and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Election

Reported in : AIR2009MP92

by the Government of India, Ministry of Defence, New Delhi, under Sub-section (1) of Section 15 of the Cantonments Act, 2006 (for short 'the Act'), 9th November 2008 was fixed as the date on which the elections to the

Smt. Shobha Kailash Bonekar Vs. Cantonment Executive Officer, Cantonme ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : ServiceCivil

Acts : Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulations Act, 1977 - Sections 2(11), 2(20), 2(21), 2(25), 3, 3(1), 8, 9, 10, 10(2), 11 and 62; General Clauses Act; Maharashtra Secondary and Higher Secondary Education Boards Act, 1965 - Sections 6, 18 and 19; Bombay Primary Education Act, 1947; Maharashtra Zilla Parishads Act - Sections 2(26); Cantonments Act, 2006 - Sections 280; Cantonments Act, 1924; Constitution of India - Article 243P; Cantonment Fund Servants Rules, 1937 - Rules 2, 11, 12, 12A, 12(3), 13, 14 and 15

Reported in : AIR2008AP23; AIR2008Bom23(FB)

2(20) of the Act. On this background, we come to the schools run by the Cantonment Board.18. The Cantonments Act, 2006 has recently come into force from 13-9-2006 and has repealed the earlier Cantonments Act, 1924. 'Cantonment' is defined … by respondent No. 3 by filing Appeal No. 20 of 2005 before the School Tribunal at Solapur, under Section 9 of the Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulations Act, 1977 (for short, ''MEPS Act'). … was promoted to the post of Head Mistress by the order dated 17-2-2005 issued by the Cantonment Board. That order was challenged by respondent No.

Shri Vinod Kumar Bakshi and ors. Vs. Delhi Cantonment Board and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Election

Acts : Cantonment Act, 2006 - Sections 17, 28, 28(2), 29, 30 and 31; Cantonment Act, 1924; Cantonment Electoral Rules, 2007 - Rules 10, 11, 12, 13, 13(3), 13(7), 14, 15, 16, 17, 17(1) and 19; Cantonment Board Rules - Rule 13(3)

Reported in : AIR2008Delhi131; 149(2008)DLT643

50,000 persons and consequently it is a category 1 cantonment.10. Prior to coming into force of the Cantonment Act, 2006, the Delhi Cantonment Board was governed by the Cantonment Act, 1924 which provided for seven members on the … ward No. 3 of Delhi Cantt. on 2nd January, 2008 by the Chief Executive Officer of the Delhi Cantonment Board, and have assailed the action of the respondent No. 1 in causing to be published an electoral … as member of the Board are concerned, the same are contained in Sections 28 & 29 of the Cantonment Act, 2006 which deserves to be

A.P. Sarpanches Association and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Election

Acts : Andhra Pradesh Legislative Council Act, 2005 - Sections 4; Representation of People Act, 1950 - Sections 15, 16, 18, 22, 23, 27, 27(1) and 27(2); Andhra Pradesh Panchayat Raj Act, 1994 - Sections 2(17), 2(18), 2(23), 2(45), 6, 8, 11, 12, 14(1), 45, 117, 140, 148, 148(1), 149(1), 150, 151, 161, 177(1), 177(2), 177(3), 178, 179, 192 and 222; Representation of People (Amendment) Act, 1963; Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Act, 1955 - Sections 1A, 1B, 1C, 5 and 8 to 12; Andhra Pradesh Municipalities Act, 1965 - Sections 8 to 12; Cantonments Act, 1924; Cantonments Act, 2006; Municipal Corporations Act, 1994; Andhra Pradesh Districts (Formation) Act, 1974 - Sections 3; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 169, 169(1), 171, 171(1) to 171(4), 243, 243A, 243B, 243E, 243G, 243K, 243P and 243Q

Reported in : AIR2007AP273; 2007(4)ALD783; 2007(5)ALT707

Cantonment Boards owe their existence to the Cantonments Act, 1924 (The 1924 Act has been repealed by the Cantonments Act, 2006), and Zilla Parishads and Mandal Parishads owe their existence to the Andhra Pradesh Panchayat Raj Act, 1994. Section … Sabhas as electors for the local authorities constituency in the Fourth Schedule to the Representation of People Act, 1950 (for short, 'the 1950 Act').2. Petitioner No. 1 is an association of Sarpanchas of different Gram Panchayats of

Smt.T.M.Nagarani and ors Vs. Ms.Andhra Tiles

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Andhra Pradesh (AP) Buildings (Lease, Rent & Eviction) Control Act, 1960 - Sections 10(2)(i), 10(3)(iii)(a), 32(c); Cantonment Act, 2006 - Section 60, Chapter-III; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order XIV Rule 12

petitioners. In that case, the question was whether the expression 'Municipality in State' in Section 60 of the Cantonments Act, 1924 takes within its sweep the Hyderabad Municipal Corporation also. The issue, namely, whether the Cantonment was part … the control of the Central Government and being administered by separate Boards constituted under Chapter-III of the Cantonment Act, 2006. 3. Therefore, it cannot be said that the Secunderabad Cantonment area forms part of the Hyderabad Municipal Corporation … ORDER: 1. This civil revision petition arises out of order, dated 22.12.2011, in R.A.No.116

Rohit Gera Vs. Pune Cantonment Board Golibar Maidan and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

dated 21st May, 2009 issued by respondent No.1 Pune Cantonment Board issued under Section 248 (1) of the Cantonments Act, 2006 (hereinafter referred to as “the said Act” for short), order dated 30th November, 2013 passed in Appeal preferred

Delhi Cantonment Board vs.smt Shamim Bano

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) by Delhi Cantonment Board (the complainant), a statutory authority constituted under the Cantonments Act, 2006, seek leave to appeal against acquittal of the respective respondents by identical judgments rendered by the court of … R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) TARSEM SINGH ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Shekhar Nanavaty, Advocate 1. These thirteen petitions presented under Section 378(4) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) by Delhi Cantonment Board (the complainant), a statutory authority

P.A. Mangalam Vs. the Chief Executive Officer, Chennai and Another

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Limited. The petitioner submitted an application to erect, re-erect and alter a building under Section 235 of the Cantonments Act, 2006 (Form A) on 28.12.2011 in respect of the property situated at No.9, GST Road, St.Thomas Mount, Chennai 600 … the petitioner's existing building and committing any act of waste in No.9, G.S.T. Road, St. Thomas Mount, Chennai 16.) 1. This Writ Petition is filed seeking to forbear the respondents, their men, agents, servants or subordinates or