Advanced Search Results

Maqbool Raza Ghaffar HussaIn Vs. Joint Director of Consolidation, U.P. ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Tenancy Law; Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1951 - Sections 240D, 240G and 240J; Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms (Amendment) Act, 1954

Reported in : AIR1969All26

sealed and signed under Section 240-J neither create a bar of res judicata nor that of conclusiveness. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … shown as the 'Adhivasi'.2. The submission of the petitioner is that in view of the provisions contained in Chapter IX-A of the Act once a compensation statement becomes final, the entry in it showing a particular person … Section 8 of the Maharashtra Act cannot entertain appeals filed under Section 9 by the employees working in schools which are established and administered by

Sunil Kumar Kori and Anr. Vs. Gopal Das Kabra and Ors.Etc.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Election

the interim directions in the said Writ Petitions a substantial number of illegally constructed houses were demolished. The Cantonments Act, 2006 re-enacted the existing Act of 1924 after taking into consideration the recommendations made by the Standing Committee of … unfit him to become an elector or has been sentenced by a Criminal Court for any offence under Chapter IXA of the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860): Provided that any disqualification incurred by a person under … Hubli v. Subha Rao Hanumatharao Prayag reported in (1976) 4 SCC830at paragraph 9.13. The learned Senior Counsel for the Cantonment Board submitted that the provisions

Vishwanath Vs. Board of Revenue and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : CivilProperty

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950

Reported in : 2004(1)AWC351

they were not disabled persons - held, compensation statement can be challenged in separate or collateral proceedings. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … Yatindra Singh, J 1. The main question in this writ petition is, whether the compensation statement prepared under Chapter IX-A (Conferment of Sirdari Rights on Adhivasi) under U. P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950 (the … contesting respondents filed an appeal on 4.9.1964. This appeal was allowed on 9.10.1964 and the case was remanded for decision on merits. The appellate court

Chief Executive Officer, Cantonment Board Vs. Tenzing Gopu Lama and Et ...

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Criminal

the offences are non-cognizable and bailable one. The same offence has been brought under the new enactment, The Cantonments Act, 2006 with the same nature of punishment.7. To resolve the legal controversy, it is also necessary to reproduce Section … Since the Offences were triable under summons procedure, the learned Judicial Magistrate took cognizance of the offence under Chapter XX of Cr.P.C. and proceeded with the cases by way of explaining the substance of accusations to the

Smt. Chaboo Devi Vs. Pt. Ram Sarup and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Civil

Acts : Allahabad High Court Rules, 1952 - Rule 10(2); Allahabad High Court Orders; Court-fees Act, 1870 - Sections 4; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 4 and 122 - Order 44, Rule 1

Reported in : AIR1965All79

making Rule 1 of Order 44 not applicable to a Special Appeal but there is Rule 10(2) in Chapter 9 of Rules of Court made by this Court laying down that.'in a Special Appeal from the judgment of … memorandum of appeal must be 'duly stamped'- provision of Court-fees Act prevail over Code of Civil Procedure. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.

Danish Infratech Private Limited Vs. Delhi Cantonment Board

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, besides seeking declaration that Section 248(1) of the Cantonments Act, 2006 is unconstitutional and ultra vires the scheme of the Constitution of India, also seeks quashing of the notices … of this Court in Sales Tax Bar Association (Regd.) supra was concerned with Sections 30 to 35 under Chapter VI of the Delhi Value Added Tax Act, 2004 (DVAT Act) and the scheme of which Act also … (1977) 4 SCC98.22. In Haryana Financial Corporation Vs. Kailash Chandra Ahuja (2008) 9 SCC31 the test of prejudice was applied and it was held that

Danish Infratech Private Limited Vs. Delhi Cantonment Board

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, besides seeking declaration that Section 248(1) of the Cantonments Act, 2006 is unconstitutional and ultra vires the scheme of the Constitution of India, also seeks quashing of the notices … of this Court in Sales Tax Bar Association (Regd.) supra was concerned with Sections 30 to 35 under Chapter VI of the Delhi Value Added Tax Act, 2004 (DVAT Act) and the scheme of which Act also … (1977) 4 SCC98.22. In Haryana Financial Corporation Vs. Kailash Chandra Ahuja (2008) 9 SCC31 the test of prejudice was applied and it was held that

Danish Infratech Private Limited Vs. Delhi Cantonment Board

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, besides seeking declaration that Section 248(1) of the Cantonments Act, 2006 is unconstitutional and ultra vires the scheme of the Constitution of India, also seeks quashing of the notices … of this Court in Sales Tax Bar Association (Regd.) supra was concerned with Sections 30 to 35 under Chapter VI of the Delhi Value Added Tax Act, 2004 (DVAT Act) and the scheme of which Act also … (1977) 4 SCC98.22. In Haryana Financial Corporation Vs. Kailash Chandra Ahuja (2008) 9 SCC31 the test of prejudice was applied and it was held that

Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Limited (Mtnl) vs Delhi Cantonment Board, Th ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

tax by the respondent. However, on 1st December 2021, the respondent issued notices under Section 116 of the Cantonments Act, 2006 (hereinafter ‘Act’), seeking information for the purpose of assessment of property tax. This was followed by another notice … W.P.(C) 2270/2026 Page 5 of 996. Conditions of right to appeal.-No appeal shall be heard ordetermined under this Chapter unless- (a) ……(b) the amount including the assessed tax or duty, if any, in dispute inthe appeal shall … property at Shastri Bazar, Delhi Cantonment.Signed By:VIVEK W.P.(C) 2270/2026 Page 1 of 92.2. The subject property was never assessed for property tax by the respondent.

Rajive Raturi Vs. Union of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Government or any establishment wholly or substantially financed by that Government, or a Cantonment Board constituted under the Cantonments Act, 2006 (41 of 2006), the Central Government; (ii) in relation to a State Government or any establishment, wholly or … towards the prevention of disabilities: and To create a barrier free environment for Persons with Disabilities. Under its chapter VIII, titled “Non-Discrimination”, the Disabilities Act, 1995 aimed to provide persons with disabilities with a non-handicapping environment to … 10-2-2001 See Report of United Nations Consultative Expert Group Meeting on International 9 perspective came to fore, in international thinking, in the 1970s when United