Advanced Search Results

Ashish Kumar Vs. the Secretary, Medical Health and Education, U.P. Luc ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Medical Council Act, 1956 - Sections 11(1), 12(1), 13, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 19(A), 20, 20(A), 21, 22, 25, 32, 33 and 33(2); Indian Medical Council (Amendment) Act - Sections 10(A), (B) and (C); University Grants Commission Act; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 162 and 226; Uttar Pradesh State Universities Act, 1973 - Sections 28(5); Uttar Pradesh Electricity (Regulation of Supply, Distribution, Consumption and Use) Order; Electricity Act, 1910; Mines and Minerals (Regulation and Development) Act, 1957; Uttar Pradesh General Clauses Act, 1904 - Sections 4(29A); Uttar Pradesh Act, 1980

Reported in : AIR1995All98; (1994)3UPLBEC1740

by migration/transfer - if any student wrongly permitted admission by migration no right created in other students. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … provisions of the Medical Council of India Act, 1956 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') and particular on Chapter V of 'The recommendations of the Medical Council of India on Graduate Medical Education' concerning 'Migration/Transfer of students … to from any one medical college should not exceed the limit of 5% of its intake in any one rnedical college in one year. (e)

Sunil Kumar Kori and Anr. Vs. Gopal Das Kabra and Ors.Etc.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Election

the interim directions in the said Writ Petitions a substantial number of illegally constructed houses were demolished. The Cantonments Act, 2006 re-enacted the existing Act of 1924 after taking into consideration the recommendations made by the Standing Committee of … unfit him to become an elector or has been sentenced by a Criminal Court for any offence under Chapter IXA of the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860): Provided that any disqualification incurred by a person under … Petition challenging the voters list was not maintainable. He relied upon Rule 54 which provides for an election to be challenged only by way of

Chief Executive Officer, Cantonment Board Vs. Tenzing Gopu Lama and Et ...

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Criminal

the offences are non-cognizable and bailable one. The same offence has been brought under the new enactment, The Cantonments Act, 2006 with the same nature of punishment.7. To resolve the legal controversy, it is also necessary to reproduce Section … Since the Offences were triable under summons procedure, the learned Judicial Magistrate took cognizance of the offence under Chapter XX of Cr.P.C. and proceeded with the cases by way of explaining the substance of accusations to the … the Cantonments Act, 1924 which provides punishment of imposing fine of Rs. 5000/-. Hence, the offences are non-cognizable and bailable one. The same offence has

Danish Infratech Private Limited Vs. Delhi Cantonment Board

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, besides seeking declaration that Section 248(1) of the Cantonments Act, 2006 is unconstitutional and ultra vires the scheme of the Constitution of India, also seeks quashing of the notices … of this Court in Sales Tax Bar Association (Regd.) supra was concerned with Sections 30 to 35 under Chapter VI of the Delhi Value Added Tax Act, 2004 (DVAT Act) and the scheme of which Act also … Lords also in Pearlberg Vs. Varty (Inspector of Taxes) [1972]. 1 W.L.R. 534 held that before the Courts exercise unusual power of supplementing the procedure

Danish Infratech Private Limited Vs. Delhi Cantonment Board

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, besides seeking declaration that Section 248(1) of the Cantonments Act, 2006 is unconstitutional and ultra vires the scheme of the Constitution of India, also seeks quashing of the notices … of this Court in Sales Tax Bar Association (Regd.) supra was concerned with Sections 30 to 35 under Chapter VI of the Delhi Value Added Tax Act, 2004 (DVAT Act) and the scheme of which Act also … Lords also in Pearlberg Vs. Varty (Inspector of Taxes) [1972]. 1 W.L.R. 534 held that before the Courts exercise unusual power of supplementing the procedure

Danish Infratech Private Limited Vs. Delhi Cantonment Board

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, besides seeking declaration that Section 248(1) of the Cantonments Act, 2006 is unconstitutional and ultra vires the scheme of the Constitution of India, also seeks quashing of the notices … of this Court in Sales Tax Bar Association (Regd.) supra was concerned with Sections 30 to 35 under Chapter VI of the Delhi Value Added Tax Act, 2004 (DVAT Act) and the scheme of which Act also … Lords also in Pearlberg Vs. Varty (Inspector of Taxes) [1972]. 1 W.L.R. 534 held that before the Courts exercise unusual power of supplementing the procedure

Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Limited (Mtnl) vs Delhi Cantonment Board, Th ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

tax by the respondent. However, on 1st December 2021, the respondent issued notices under Section 116 of the Cantonments Act, 2006 (hereinafter ‘Act’), seeking information for the purpose of assessment of property tax. This was followed by another notice … W.P.(C) 2270/2026 Page 5 of 996. Conditions of right to appeal.-No appeal shall be heard ordetermined under this Chapter unless- (a) ……(b) the amount including the assessed tax or duty, if any, in dispute inthe appeal shall

Rajive Raturi versus Union of India & Ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : [2024]11S.C.R.970; 2024 INSC 858

Government or any establishment wholly or substantially financed by that Government, or a Cantonment Board constituted under the Cantonments Act, 2006 (41 of 2006), the Central Government; (ii) in relation to a State Government or any establishment, wholly or … Articles 14, 19, 21. Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016 - ss.2(b), 39, 40-46, 89, 100 - Chapter VI - Right of Persons with Disabilities Rules, 2017 - r.15 - Rules for Accessibility - Scheme of … Gulf Goans Hotels Co. Ltd. v. Union of India [2014] 10 SCR 536 : (2014) 10 SCC 673; Gaurav Kumar v. Union of India &

Smt.T.M.Nagarani and Others Vs. M/S.Andhra Tiles

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Land Acquisition

petitioners. In that case, the question was whether the expression 'Municipality in State' in Section 60 of the Cantonments Act, 1924 takes within its sweep the Hyderabad Municipal Corporation also. The issue, namely, whether the Cantonment was part … the control of the Central Government and being administered by separate Boards constituted under Chapter-III of the Cantonment Act, 2006. Therefore, it cannot be said that the Secunderabad Cantonment area forms part of the Hyderabad Municipal Corporation area. … reliance on the judgment of the Supreme Court in Cantonment Board, Secunderabad v. G.Venketram Reddy and other1. On a careful reading of the judgment, I

Rajive Raturi Vs. Union of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Government or any establishment wholly or substantially financed by that Government, or a Cantonment Board constituted under the Cantonments Act, 2006 (41 of 2006), the Central Government; (ii) in relation to a State Government or any establishment, wholly or … towards the prevention of disabilities: and To create a barrier free environment for Persons with Disabilities. Under its chapter VIII, titled “Non-Discrimination”, the Disabilities Act, 1995 aimed to provide persons with disabilities with a non-handicapping environment to … are sixty to seventy million disabled persons in India and 2 almost 50% thereof suffer from visual disability. The fundamental concern of these visually impaired