Advanced Search Results

Sunil Kumar Kori and Anr. Vs. Gopal Das Kabra and Ors.Etc.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Election

the interim directions in the said Writ Petitions a substantial number of illegally constructed houses were demolished. The Cantonments Act, 2006 re-enacted the existing Act of 1924 after taking into consideration the recommendations made by the Standing Committee of … unfit him to become an elector or has been sentenced by a Criminal Court for any offence under Chapter IXA of the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860): Provided that any disqualification incurred by a person under … of City of Hubli v. Subha Rao Hanumatharao Prayag reported in (1976) 4 SCC830at paragraph 9.13. The learned Senior Counsel for the Cantonment Board submitted

Chief Executive Officer, Cantonment Board Vs. Tenzing Gopu Lama and Et ...

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Criminal

the offences are non-cognizable and bailable one. The same offence has been brought under the new enactment, The Cantonments Act, 2006 with the same nature of punishment.7. To resolve the legal controversy, it is also necessary to reproduce Section … Since the Offences were triable under summons procedure, the learned Judicial Magistrate took cognizance of the offence under Chapter XX of Cr.P.C. and proceeded with the cases by way of explaining the substance of accusations to the … under Article 227 of the Constitution of India read with Sections 397, 401 and 482 of Cr.P.C. are being disposed of by this common order.3.

Fatmatul Kubra Vs. Achchi Begam

Court : Allahabad

Subject : CivilProperty

Reported in : AIR1914All339

of a mahal--Sale by Civil Court amin-Jurisdiction--General Mules (Civil) of 1911, chapter IV, Rules 5 and 8 - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … by Civil Court amin-Jurisdiction--General Mules (Civil) of 1911, chapter IV, Rules 5 and 8 - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. CJ, P.V.

U.P. State Road Transport Corporation Vs. Regional Transport Authority ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 57, 58, 58(1), 58(2) and (2A), 64, 68-B, 68-F(1), 68-F(1-E), 68-F(2), 68-F(3) and 68-I; Uttar Pradesh State Road Transport Services (Development) Rules, 1974 - Rule 10(4)(5) and 10(4)

Reported in : AIR1992All51

by virtue of Section 68-B over provisions of Chapter IV - held, Rule ultra vires being inconsistent. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … rule is inconsistent with the provisions of Chapter IV-A mentioned before, it cannot be implemented being ultra vires. 4. The argument of the learned counsel for the petitioner relating to the fee for application of permit prescribed

Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Limited (Mtnl) vs Delhi Cantonment Board, Th ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

tax by the respondent. However, on 1st December 2021, the respondent issued notices under Section 116 of the Cantonments Act, 2006 (hereinafter ‘Act’), seeking information for the purpose of assessment of property tax. This was followed by another notice … W.P.(C) 2270/2026 Page 5 of 996. Conditions of right to appeal.-No appeal shall be heard ordetermined under this Chapter unless- (a) ……(b) the amount including the assessed tax or duty, if any, in dispute inthe appeal shall … and 28th March 2023.3. The petitioner filed a writ petition being W.P.(C) 4022/2025, whichwas disposed of by this Court vide order dated 3rd April, 2025,

Danish Infratech Private Limited Vs. Delhi Cantonment Board

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, besides seeking declaration that Section 248(1) of the Cantonments Act, 2006 is unconstitutional and ultra vires the scheme of the Constitution of India, also seeks quashing of the notices … of this Court in Sales Tax Bar Association (Regd.) supra was concerned with Sections 30 to 35 under Chapter VI of the Delhi Value Added Tax Act, 2004 (DVAT Act) and the scheme of which Act also … have in or about the year 2012 purchased property bearing no.CB390 measuring 422 sq. yds. in the Cantonment Board Area, situated at Naraina, Delhi Cantt,

Danish Infratech Private Limited Vs. Delhi Cantonment Board

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, besides seeking declaration that Section 248(1) of the Cantonments Act, 2006 is unconstitutional and ultra vires the scheme of the Constitution of India, also seeks quashing of the notices … of this Court in Sales Tax Bar Association (Regd.) supra was concerned with Sections 30 to 35 under Chapter VI of the Delhi Value Added Tax Act, 2004 (DVAT Act) and the scheme of which Act also … have in or about the year 2012 purchased property bearing no.CB390 measuring 422 sq. yds. in the Cantonment Board Area, situated at Naraina, Delhi Cantt,

Danish Infratech Private Limited Vs. Delhi Cantonment Board

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, besides seeking declaration that Section 248(1) of the Cantonments Act, 2006 is unconstitutional and ultra vires the scheme of the Constitution of India, also seeks quashing of the notices … of this Court in Sales Tax Bar Association (Regd.) supra was concerned with Sections 30 to 35 under Chapter VI of the Delhi Value Added Tax Act, 2004 (DVAT Act) and the scheme of which Act also … have in or about the year 2012 purchased property bearing no.CB390 measuring 422 sq. yds. in the Cantonment Board Area, situated at Naraina, Delhi Cantt,

Rajive Raturi versus Union of India & Ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : [2024]11S.C.R.970; 2024 INSC 858

Government or any establishment wholly or substantially financed by that Government, or a Cantonment Board constituted under the Cantonments Act, 2006 (41 of 2006), the Central Government; (ii) in relation to a State Government or any establishment, wholly or … Articles 14, 19, 21. Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016 - ss.2(b), 39, 40-46, 89, 100 - Chapter VI - Right of Persons with Disabilities Rules, 2017 - r.15 - Rules for Accessibility - Scheme of … compliance - Union Government to delineate mandatory rules, as required by Section 40, within three months from the date of this Judgment - This exercise

Rajive Raturi Vs. Union of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Government or any establishment wholly or substantially financed by that Government, or a Cantonment Board constituted under the Cantonments Act, 2006 (41 of 2006), the Central Government; (ii) in relation to a State Government or any establishment, wholly or … towards the prevention of disabilities: and To create a barrier free environment for Persons with Disabilities. Under its chapter VIII, titled “Non-Discrimination”, the Disabilities Act, 1995 aimed to provide persons with disabilities with a non-handicapping environment to … pavement or footpath ends and a road or a zebra crossing starts. 4 e) Providing for unobstructed footpaths with minimum hindrances in such manner so