Advanced Search Results

Smt.T.M.Nagarani and ors Vs. Ms.Andhra Tiles

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Andhra Pradesh (AP) Buildings (Lease, Rent & Eviction) Control Act, 1960 - Sections 10(2)(i), 10(3)(iii)(a), 32(c); Cantonment Act, 2006 - Section 60, Chapter-III; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order XIV Rule 12

petitioners. In that case, the question was whether the expression 'Municipality in State' in Section 60 of the Cantonments Act, 1924 takes within its sweep the Hyderabad Municipal Corporation also. The issue, namely, whether the Cantonment was part … the control of the Central Government and being administered by separate Boards constituted under Chapter-III of the Cantonment Act, 2006. 3. Therefore, it cannot be said that the Secunderabad Cantonment area forms part of the Hyderabad Municipal Corporation … ORDER: 1. This civil revision petition arises out of order, dated 22.12.2011, in R.A.No.116 of 2011, on the file of the learned Chief Judge,

Sunil Kumar Kori and Anr. Vs. Gopal Das Kabra and Ors.Etc.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Election

the interim directions in the said Writ Petitions a substantial number of illegally constructed houses were demolished. The Cantonments Act, 2006 re-enacted the existing Act of 1924 after taking into consideration the recommendations made by the Standing Committee of … unfit him to become an elector or has been sentenced by a Criminal Court for any offence under Chapter IXA of the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860): Provided that any disqualification incurred by a person under … THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.9728-9729 of 2016 (Arising out of SLP (C) No.20677-20678 of 2016) SUNIL KUMAR KORI &

Jagat NaraIn Dwivedi Vs. District Inspector of Schools, Pratapgarh and ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Service

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Education Act, 1921 - Sections 16E, 16F and 16FF; Uttar Pradesh Education Regulations, 1921 - Regulation 3(1) and (2)

Reported in : 1998(1)AWC118; (1998)1UPLBEC181

contravention of provision of Act - seniority could not be counted with effect from date of joining. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … framed under the Act for the purpose of this Sections 16E, 16F and 16FF and are contained in Chapter II. Relevant Regulation 3 dealing with determination of inter se seniority is quoted hereinbelow for reference.'3. (1) The … delivered them personally to Sri J.N. Dwivedi and Sri S.N. Shukla on 23.7.1973. Sri J.N. Dwivedi claims that he joined the post immediately thereafter on

Chief Executive Officer, Cantonment Board Vs. Tenzing Gopu Lama and Et ...

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Criminal

the offences are non-cognizable and bailable one. The same offence has been brought under the new enactment, The Cantonments Act, 2006 with the same nature of punishment.7. To resolve the legal controversy, it is also necessary to reproduce Section … Since the Offences were triable under summons procedure, the learned Judicial Magistrate took cognizance of the offence under Chapter XX of Cr.P.C. and proceeded with the cases by way of explaining the substance of accusations to the … The questions are whether any order of dismissal of complaint under Section 256 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (briefly 'Cr.P.C.') is appealable and secondly,

Danish Infratech Private Limited Vs. Delhi Cantonment Board

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, besides seeking declaration that Section 248(1) of the Cantonments Act, 2006 is unconstitutional and ultra vires the scheme of the Constitution of India, also seeks quashing of the notices … of this Court in Sales Tax Bar Association (Regd.) supra was concerned with Sections 30 to 35 under Chapter VI of the Delhi Value Added Tax Act, 2004 (DVAT Act) and the scheme of which Act also … HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:19. h November, 2014 % + W.P.(C) No.7139/2014 & CM No.16698/2014 (for stay). DANISH INFRATECH PRIVATE

Danish Infratech Private Limited Vs. Delhi Cantonment Board

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, besides seeking declaration that Section 248(1) of the Cantonments Act, 2006 is unconstitutional and ultra vires the scheme of the Constitution of India, also seeks quashing of the notices … of this Court in Sales Tax Bar Association (Regd.) supra was concerned with Sections 30 to 35 under Chapter VI of the Delhi Value Added Tax Act, 2004 (DVAT Act) and the scheme of which Act also … HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:19. h November, 2014 % + W.P.(C) No.7139/2014 & CM No.16698/2014 (for stay). DANISH INFRATECH PRIVATE

Danish Infratech Private Limited Vs. Delhi Cantonment Board

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, besides seeking declaration that Section 248(1) of the Cantonments Act, 2006 is unconstitutional and ultra vires the scheme of the Constitution of India, also seeks quashing of the notices … of this Court in Sales Tax Bar Association (Regd.) supra was concerned with Sections 30 to 35 under Chapter VI of the Delhi Value Added Tax Act, 2004 (DVAT Act) and the scheme of which Act also … HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:19. h November, 2014 % + W.P.(C) No.7139/2014 & CM No.16698/2014 (for stay). DANISH INFRATECH PRIVATE

Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Limited (Mtnl) vs Delhi Cantonment Board, Th ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

tax by the respondent. However, on 1st December 2021, the respondent issued notices under Section 116 of the Cantonments Act, 2006 (hereinafter ‘Act’), seeking information for the purpose of assessment of property tax. This was followed by another notice … W.P.(C) 2270/2026 Page 5 of 996. Conditions of right to appeal.-No appeal shall be heard ordetermined under this Chapter unless- (a) ……(b) the amount including the assessed tax or duty, if any, in dispute inthe appeal shall … HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Date of Decision: 17th February 2026+ W.P.(C) 2270/2026 & CM APPL. 10964-10965/2026MAHANAGAR TELEPHONENIGAM LIMITED (MTNL) .....Petitioner Through: Mr.

Smt.T.M.Nagarani and Others Vs. M/S.Andhra Tiles

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Land Acquisition

petitioners. In that case, the question was whether the expression 'Municipality in State' in Section 60 of the Cantonments Act, 1924 takes within its sweep the Hyderabad Municipal Corporation also. The issue, namely, whether the Cantonment was part … the control of the Central Government and being administered by separate Boards constituted under Chapter-III of the Cantonment Act, 2006. Therefore, it cannot be said that the Secunderabad Cantonment area forms part of the Hyderabad Municipal Corporation area. … 1 (SN) ORDER: This civil revision petition arises out of order, dated 22.12.2011, in R.A.No.116 of 2011, on the file of the learned Chief Judge,

Rajive Raturi versus Union of India & Ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : [2024]11S.C.R.970; 2024 INSC 858

Government or any establishment wholly or substantially financed by that Government, or a Cantonment Board constituted under the Cantonments Act, 2006 (41 of 2006), the Central Government; (ii) in relation to a State Government or any establishment, wholly or … Articles 14, 19, 21. Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016 - ss.2(b), 39, 40-46, 89, 100 - Chapter VI - Right of Persons with Disabilities Rules, 2017 - r.15 - Rules for Accessibility - Scheme of