Advanced Search Results

Sunil Kumar Kori and Anr. Vs. Gopal Das Kabra and Ors.Etc.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Election

the interim directions in the said Writ Petitions a substantial number of illegally constructed houses were demolished. The Cantonments Act, 2006 re-enacted the existing Act of 1924 after taking into consideration the recommendations made by the Standing Committee of … notification dated 05.03.2015 was issued by the Government of India under Section 15 of the Cantonment Act, 2006 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) directing … unfit him to become an elector or has been sentenced by a Criminal Court for any offence under Chapter IXA of the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860): Provided that any disqualification incurred by a person under

Smt.T.M.Nagarani and ors Vs. Ms.Andhra Tiles

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Andhra Pradesh (AP) Buildings (Lease, Rent & Eviction) Control Act, 1960 - Sections 10(2)(i), 10(3)(iii)(a), 32(c); Cantonment Act, 2006 - Section 60, Chapter-III; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order XIV Rule 12

petitioners. In that case, the question was whether the expression 'Municipality in State' in Section 60 of the Cantonments Act, 1924 takes within its sweep the Hyderabad Municipal Corporation also. The issue, namely, whether the Cantonment was part … the control of the Central Government and being administered by separate Boards constituted under Chapter-III of the Cantonment Act, 2006. 3. Therefore, it cannot be said that the Secunderabad Cantonment area forms part of the Hyderabad Municipal Corporation

Rajive Raturi versus Union of India & Ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : [2024]11S.C.R.970; 2024 INSC 858

Government or any establishment wholly or substantially financed by that Government, or a Cantonment Board constituted under the Cantonments Act, 2006 (41 of 2006), the Central Government; (ii) in relation to a State Government or any establishment, wholly or … Articles 14, 19, 21. Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016 - ss.2(b), 39, 40-46, 89, 100 - Chapter VI - Right of Persons with Disabilities Rules, 2017 - r.15 - Rules for Accessibility - Scheme of

Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Limited (Mtnl) vs Delhi Cantonment Board, Th ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

tax by the respondent. However, on 1st December 2021, the respondent issued notices under Section 116 of the Cantonments Act, 2006 (hereinafter ‘Act’), seeking information for the purpose of assessment of property tax. This was followed by another notice … W.P.(C) 2270/2026 Page 5 of 996. Conditions of right to appeal.-No appeal shall be heard ordetermined under this Chapter unless- (a) ……(b) the amount including the assessed tax or duty, if any, in dispute inthe appeal shall … event the petitioner files the statutory appeal within a further period of 15 days from today, the appellate authority would consider condoning the delay in

Rajive Raturi Vs. Union of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Government or any establishment wholly or substantially financed by that Government, or a Cantonment Board constituted under the Cantonments Act, 2006 (41 of 2006), the Central Government; (ii) in relation to a State Government or any establishment, wholly or … towards the prevention of disabilities: and To create a barrier free environment for Persons with Disabilities. Under its chapter VIII, titled “Non-Discrimination”, the Disabilities Act, 1995 aimed to provide persons with disabilities with a non-handicapping environment to … for himself and his family, including adequate food, clothing and housing”; Article 15 recognizes the “Right of everyone to take part in cultural life”.8) Even

Smt.T.M.Nagarani and Others Vs. M/S.Andhra Tiles

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Land Acquisition

petitioners. In that case, the question was whether the expression 'Municipality in State' in Section 60 of the Cantonments Act, 1924 takes within its sweep the Hyderabad Municipal Corporation also. The issue, namely, whether the Cantonment was part … the control of the Central Government and being administered by separate Boards constituted under Chapter-III of the Cantonment Act, 2006. Therefore, it cannot be said that the Secunderabad Cantonment area forms part of the Hyderabad Municipal Corporation area.

T.P.Cherian Philip Vs. The National Highways Authority of India

Court : Kerala

Subject : Land Acquisition

also claims W.A. No. 1665 of 2015 -:2. :- registration certificate under the Food Safety and Standards Authority Act, 2006. Petitioner claims that he is carrying on business in a place where there is no traffic and in … by Notification in the Official Gazette is empowered to establish Highway Administration. Chapter III contains the heading W.A. No. 1665 of 2015 -:14. :- "prevention … means a Municipal Corporation or a Municipal Council or a Nagar Panchayat, by whatever name called, or the Cantonment Board, or as the case may be, a civil area committee appointed under section 47 of the Cantonment

Smt. K. Durga Rani and Another Vs. Appropriate Authority and Another.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : [1998]231ITR472(AP); [1998]100TAXMAN492(AP)

: Also to current assessment years. Income Tax Act 1961 s.269UD Income Tax Act 1961 Chapter XX-C - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.

Major (Retd.) Amar Singh Kwatra and Another Vs. Union Of India Through ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Land Acquisition

wall are blocking the existing road which is impermissible in law keeping in view Sec. 258 of the Cantonments Act, 2006. The petitioners thereafter served notices to the respondents requesting them to stop construction of the boundary wall and … of the land under the Cantonment Act read with Cantonment Land Administration Rules, 1937, reads as under : Chapter III Classification And Management Of Lands : Land Use Norms And Planning For Klp Purposes 3.0 General Management … Army Authorities have again violated subsequent order passed by this Court dt. 15/7/13. The photographs on record and the reply of the Indian Army establishes

Chief Executive Officer, Cantonment Board Vs. Tenzing Gopu Lama and Et ...

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Criminal

the offences are non-cognizable and bailable one. The same offence has been brought under the new enactment, The Cantonments Act, 2006 with the same nature of punishment.7. To resolve the legal controversy, it is also necessary to reproduce Section … Since the Offences were triable under summons procedure, the learned Judicial Magistrate took cognizance of the offence under Chapter XX of Cr.P.C. and proceeded with the cases by way of explaining the substance of accusations to the … v. Krishnaveni reported in (1997) 4 SCC 241 : 1997 Cri LJ 1519. The relevant observations of the Apex Court are as follows:The object of