Advanced Search Results

Smt.T.M.Nagarani and ors Vs. Ms.Andhra Tiles

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Andhra Pradesh (AP) Buildings (Lease, Rent & Eviction) Control Act, 1960 - Sections 10(2)(i), 10(3)(iii)(a), 32(c); Cantonment Act, 2006 - Section 60, Chapter-III; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order XIV Rule 12

petitioners. In that case, the question was whether the expression 'Municipality in State' in Section 60 of the Cantonments Act, 1924 takes within its sweep the Hyderabad Municipal Corporation also. The issue, namely, whether the Cantonment was part … the control of the Central Government and being administered by separate Boards constituted under Chapter-III of the Cantonment Act, 2006. 3. Therefore, it cannot be said that the Secunderabad Cantonment area forms part of the Hyderabad Municipal Corporation … petitioners filed R.C.No.26 of 2010 seeking eviction of the respondent under Sections 10(2)(i) and 10(3)(iii)(a) of the A.P.Buildings (Lease, Rent & Eviction) Control Act, 1960

Chandra Pal Singh Vs. General Officer, Commanding-in-chief, Headquarte ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Service

Acts : Army Act, 1950 - Sections 133 and 164(2); Army Rules, 59 and 60; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 161, 161(3), 164 and 207; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 1998(1)AWC53

question - no requirement of recording reason for the findings and sentence imposed in Court martial proceedings. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … There is no dispute that the petitioner being an army personnel is subject to the Army Act, 1950. Chapter X of the Act deals with Courts Martial and Chapter XI deals with Procedure of Courts Martial. Section … State Board. The Divisional Board holds the examination and issues certificates after 10th and 12th standard examinations. The State Board advises the State Government on

Sunil Kumar Kori and Anr. Vs. Gopal Das Kabra and Ors.Etc.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Election

the interim directions in the said Writ Petitions a substantial number of illegally constructed houses were demolished. The Cantonments Act, 2006 re-enacted the existing Act of 1924 after taking into consideration the recommendations made by the Standing Committee of … unfit him to become an elector or has been sentenced by a Criminal Court for any offence under Chapter IXA of the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860): Provided that any disqualification incurred by a person under … electoral rolls of the Cantonment Board, Panchamarhi strictly in accordance with Rule 10 (3) of the Cantonment Electoral Rules, 2007 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the

Chief Executive Officer, Cantonment Board Vs. Tenzing Gopu Lama and Et ...

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Criminal

the offences are non-cognizable and bailable one. The same offence has been brought under the new enactment, The Cantonments Act, 2006 with the same nature of punishment.7. To resolve the legal controversy, it is also necessary to reproduce Section … Since the Offences were triable under summons procedure, the learned Judicial Magistrate took cognizance of the offence under Chapter XX of Cr.P.C. and proceeded with the cases by way of explaining the substance of accusations to the … Cri LJ 770 (supra) and Major Gen. S. Gauraya 1986 Cri LJ 1074 (supra). I concur with the view taken by this Court in the

Danish Infratech Private Limited Vs. Delhi Cantonment Board

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, besides seeking declaration that Section 248(1) of the Cantonments Act, 2006 is unconstitutional and ultra vires the scheme of the Constitution of India, also seeks quashing of the notices … of this Court in Sales Tax Bar Association (Regd.) supra was concerned with Sections 30 to 35 under Chapter VI of the Delhi Value Added Tax Act, 2004 (DVAT Act) and the scheme of which Act also … B. Competition Commission of India Vs. Steel Authority of India Limited (2010) 10 SCC744 C. Shekhar Ghosh Vs. Union of India (2007) 1 SCC (L&S)

Danish Infratech Private Limited Vs. Delhi Cantonment Board

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, besides seeking declaration that Section 248(1) of the Cantonments Act, 2006 is unconstitutional and ultra vires the scheme of the Constitution of India, also seeks quashing of the notices … of this Court in Sales Tax Bar Association (Regd.) supra was concerned with Sections 30 to 35 under Chapter VI of the Delhi Value Added Tax Act, 2004 (DVAT Act) and the scheme of which Act also … B. Competition Commission of India Vs. Steel Authority of India Limited (2010) 10 SCC744 C. Shekhar Ghosh Vs. Union of India (2007) 1 SCC (L&S)

Danish Infratech Private Limited Vs. Delhi Cantonment Board

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, besides seeking declaration that Section 248(1) of the Cantonments Act, 2006 is unconstitutional and ultra vires the scheme of the Constitution of India, also seeks quashing of the notices … of this Court in Sales Tax Bar Association (Regd.) supra was concerned with Sections 30 to 35 under Chapter VI of the Delhi Value Added Tax Act, 2004 (DVAT Act) and the scheme of which Act also … B. Competition Commission of India Vs. Steel Authority of India Limited (2010) 10 SCC744 C. Shekhar Ghosh Vs. Union of India (2007) 1 SCC (L&S)

Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Limited (Mtnl) vs Delhi Cantonment Board, Th ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

tax by the respondent. However, on 1st December 2021, the respondent issued notices under Section 116 of the Cantonments Act, 2006 (hereinafter ‘Act’), seeking information for the purpose of assessment of property tax. This was followed by another notice … W.P.(C) 2270/2026 Page 5 of 996. Conditions of right to appeal.-No appeal shall be heard ordetermined under this Chapter unless- (a) ……(b) the amount including the assessed tax or duty, if any, in dispute inthe appeal shall … DELHI% Date of Decision: 17th February 2026+ W.P.(C) 2270/2026 & CM APPL. 10964-10965/2026MAHANAGAR TELEPHONENIGAM LIMITED (MTNL) .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Chandan Kumar and Mr. Vikram Sharma,

Rajive Raturi Vs. Union of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Government or any establishment wholly or substantially financed by that Government, or a Cantonment Board constituted under the Cantonments Act, 2006 (41 of 2006), the Central Government; (ii) in relation to a State Government or any establishment, wholly or … towards the prevention of disabilities: and To create a barrier free environment for Persons with Disabilities. Under its chapter VIII, titled “Non-Discrimination”, the Disabilities Act, 1995 aimed to provide persons with disabilities with a non-handicapping environment to … disabled and their human rights 2 Norms and Standards Relating to Disability 10-2-2001 See Report of United Nations Consultative Expert Group Meeting on International 9

Smt.T.M.Nagarani and Others Vs. M/S.Andhra Tiles

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Land Acquisition

petitioners. In that case, the question was whether the expression 'Municipality in State' in Section 60 of the Cantonments Act, 1924 takes within its sweep the Hyderabad Municipal Corporation also. The issue, namely, whether the Cantonment was part … the control of the Central Government and being administered by separate Boards constituted under Chapter-III of the Cantonment Act, 2006. Therefore, it cannot be said that the Secunderabad Cantonment area forms part of the Hyderabad Municipal Corporation area. … petitioners filed R.C.No.26 of 2010 seeking eviction of the respondent under Sections 10(2)(i) and 10(3)(iii)(a) of the A.P.Buildings (Lease, Rent & Eviction) Control Act, 1960