Advanced Search Results

Punam Chand Vs. State and anr.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1953CriLJ236

the Court of Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Mhow Cantonment. The petitioner was convicted as stated above.4. Section 103 of the Cantonments Act, 1924, runs as follows:The Executive Officer may, by written notice, call upon any inhabitant of the Cantonment to furnish … taxes in Sections 89 to 96. Then there is a heading 'Special provisions relating to taxation' and Sections 97 to 105 cover this subject.7. Mr. Maharshi contends that Section 103 is not a general provision but is

All India Federation of Tax Practitioners and ors. Vs. Union of India ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service TaxConstitution

Acts : Finance Act, 1994 - Sections 65, 65(16), 66, 67, 68, 71, 72, 73 and 83; Finance (No. 2) Act, 1998; Constitution (Eighty-eighth Amendment) Act, 2003; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 2, 3, 9C, 9D and 11B; Income Tax Act, 1961; Medicinal Act, 1955; Kerala Abkari Act; Cantonments Act, 1924 - Sections 60; Government of India Act, 1935 - Sections 100 and 142A; Uttar Pradesh Tax on Luxuries Act, 1995; Andhra Pradesh Tax on Luxuries Act, 1987; West Bengal Luxury Tax Act, 1994; Haryana Passengers and Goods Taxation Act, 1952 - Sections 3(3); Constitution of India - Articles 19(1), 245, 246, 246(1), 246(3), 248, 265, 268A, 269, 276, 276(1), 276(2), 276(3) and 366(29A)

Reported in : AIR2007SC2990; (2008)5CompLJ488(SC); (2007)211CTR(SC)449; 2007(120)ECC451; 2007LC451(SC); [2007]293ITR406(SC); JT2007(10)SC305; (2007)6MLJ1062(SC); 2007(10)SCALE178; 2007(7)SCC527

cinematograph films. A notice was issued to the appellant by the Cantonment Board under Section 60 of the Cantonments Act, 1924 imposing tax on entertainments. The said levy was challenged on the ground that under Section 100 of the … vide Finance Act, 1994 and Finance Act, 1998. According to the impugned judgment, service tax falls in Entry 97, List I of the Seventh Schedule to the Constitution.2. The question which arises for determination in this civil

Secunderabad Cantonment Board, Andhra Circle, Secunderabad Rep. by Exe ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Civil

Acts : Cantonment Act, 1924 - Sections 181, 181(3), 181(4) and 280; ;Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976; ;Record of the Rights Regulation Act - Sections 15(2); ;Land Revenue Act - Sections 158; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 11 and 79 - Order 27, Rule 3; ;Administrative Law; Constitution of India - Article 226; Cantonment Land Administration Rules, 1934 - Rules 3 and 10

Reported in : 2004(3)ALT27(SC); JT2003(9)SC316; 2003(10)SCALE33; (2003)12SCC315; (2004)1UPLBEC882

Cantonment Land Administration Rules, 1937 have been trained by virtue of power vested under Section 280 of the Cantonments Act, 1924. Rule 10 in Chapter III of the Cantonment Land Administration Rules deals with maintenance of General Land Register.

Zila Parishad (District Board) Vs. Smt. Shanti Devi and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : ContractLimitation

Acts : Uttar Pradesh District Boards Act, 1922 - Sections 192, 192(1) and 192(3); Uttar Pradesh General Clauses Act, 1904 - Sections 4(2); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 20 - Order 2, Rule 2 - Order 6, Rule 3; Limitation Act, 1908 - Schedule - Articles 56 and 120

Reported in : AIR1965All590

Act are an exact copy of theprovisions of section 326 of the Municipalities Act. Section 273 of the Cantonments Act, 1924, lays downthat '(1) No suit shall be instituted against any Board ...... in respect of any act done, … ...... be instituted after the expiry of six months from the date on which the cause of action arises.'Section 97 of the U. P. Town Improvement Act contains a similar provision concerning a suit ''in respect of an

Cantonment Board and ors. Vs. Jagat Paul Singh Cheema

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Subject : Service

Reported in : 2007(3)JKJ60

was erroneous as this view of the learned Single Judge was not countenanced by the provisions of the Cantonments Act, 1924. He refers to Section 52(2) of the Act to support his submission. According to the learned Counsel, the

Lucknow Nagar Mahapalika Vs. Sardar Karamjeet Singh and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Town Improvement Act, 1919 - Sections 2(7), 65, 66 and 97(1); Town Improvement Trust Act

Reported in : AIR1962All174

in India and outside and those decisions may be referred to for guidance. 11. Section 273 of the Cantonments Act (Central Act II of 1924) lays down a similar restricted rule of six months limitation as Section 97

Sylvania and Luxman Ltd. Vs. Raminder Singh and Another

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 - Sections 1 (3) and (4) and 2; Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) (Amendment) Act, 1995; Provincial Small Causes Courts Act, 1887 - Sections 25; Provincial Small Causes Courts (Amendment) Act, 1994; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 106; Cantonment's (Extension of Rent Control Laws) Act, 1957 - Sections 3; Cantonment Act, 1924 - Sections 3

Reported in : 1998(1)AWC454

1 as follows :'(e) Every Cantonment in Uttar Pradesh declared to be Cantonment under Section 3 of the Cantonments Act, 1924 (2 of 1924).'Consequently, it is clear that Act No. 13 of 1972 became applicable to all the cantonment … Rajendra Nath Azad, 1996 (1) ARC 348 ; Smt. Shashi Singh v. Brigadier Sukh Swarup Kapoor, 1996(1) ARC 97 ; Food Corporation of India and another a. M/S. Durga Shakti Enterprises, 1996 (1) ARC 153 and Jonson

T. Parathasarathy and ors. Vs. Smt. Madhu Sangal

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Cantonments Act, 1924 - Sections 179, 181, 181(4), 181(5), 181(6), 185, 187, 254, 256, 259 and 272; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 3(22); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 39, Rule 2A; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 190, 200 to 205, 209 and 482; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 52, 149, 294, 341, 352, 392, 427, 448, 451 and 452

Reported in : 1992CriLJ26

Acts/Rules/Orders: Cantonments Act, 1924 - Sections 179, 181, 181(4), 181(5), 181(6), 185, 187, 254, 256, 259 and 272; General Clauses Act, 1897 … Acts/Rules/Orders: Cantonments Act, 1924 - Sections 179, 181, 181(4), 181(5), 181(6), 185, 187, 254, 256, 259 and 272; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Section … Ruia v. State of Bombay 1958 SCR 618 : AIR 1958 SC 97 : 1958 Cri LJ 244; Vadilal Panchal v. Ghadigaoskar AIR 1960 SC

Union of India (Uoi) Represented by Its Secretary to Central Governmen ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Property

Acts : Andhra Pradesh Cooperative Societies Act, 1964; Andhra Pradesh (Telangana Area) Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1950 - Sections 2(11), 2(12), 3, 4, 13, 77, 78 and 50B; Requisition and Acquisition of Lands Act; Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act - Sections 19 and 19(5); Andhra Pradesh Survey and Boundaries Act; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 80; Tenancy Act - Sections 50B; Land Acquisition Act; Registration Act - Sections 54; Transfer of Property Act; Land and Pattadar Pass Books Act, 1971; Hyderabad Land Revenue Act, 1317F; Punjab Land Revenue Act, 1887 - Sections 16 and 31; Madhya Bharat Land Revenue and Tenancy Act; Evidence Act - Sections 35

Reported in : 2002(5)ALD532; 2002(5)ALT370

G.L.R. entries may have to be appreciated in the context of the history of the Secunderabad Cantonment. The Cantonments Act, 1924 applied only to British India.Hyderabad was a princely State and the provisions of the Cantonments Act do not … parties. The Tahsildar validated the said alienation and sale certificates dated 18-4-1972 were issued to the purchasers under Section 50-B of the Andhra Pradesh (Telangana Area) Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1950. The remaining land was partitioned

Ram Pratap and Others Vs. State of U.P. and Others

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Property

Acts : Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 4, 4(1), 5, 5A, 6, 9, 9(3) and 17; Uttar Pradesh Urban Land Ceiling and Regulation Act, 1976; Cantonment Act, 1924

Reported in : 1999(3)AWC2049; (1999)2UPLBEC1452

exactness, it should be left to the military and the local body, the Cantonment, functioning under the Cantonment Act. 1924. Suffice it to say that the park may be expanded beyond the Macpherson Park and around the Macpherson … Officer (NagarMahapalika). Allahabad. (4)Allahabad Development Authority,through its Chairman, (5) Ministry ofDefence, through its Secretary, (6)Sub-Area Commander, Allahabad and(7) Cantonment Board. Allahabad.The petitioners contend, all of them.that they are Bhumidhars inpossession. The petitioner Nos. 1. 2and 3 contend … village. Theycontend it was only on 17 January,1988, when a notice under Section 9(3) of the Act had been left in thevillage but not served