Advanced Search Results

Union of India and Another Vs. Mohammed MohiuddIn and Others

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Property

Acts : Cantonments Act, 1924 - Sections 3(1 and 2), 108, 178, 181, 274, 280, 282 and 283; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 226, 295(2) and 300-A; Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 - Sections 6(1) and 15(2); Cantonment Land Administration (Amendment) Rules, 1937; Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants Act, 1971; Hyderabad Land Revenue Act, 1337 Fasli; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 65 and 90; Municipalities Act - Sections 330; Cantonment Land Administration Rules, 1925 - Rules 1(A), 2, 3 and 6; Secunderabad and Aurangabad Cantonment Land Administration Rules, 1930; Andhra Pradesh (Telangana Area) Land Revenue Act, 1317-F; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1973 - Sections 11; Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Act - Sections 428, 433 and 450

Reported in : 2000(6)ALD376; 2000(6)ALT551

Estate Officer as per the Cantonment Land Administration Rules 1937 which were framed under Section 280 of the Cantonments Act, 1924, hereinafter referred to as the 1924 Act. Thus contending they sought the writ petition be dismissed.19. In view … Shiolalsing Gannusingh Rajput v. Shankar Motiram, AIR 1984 Bom. 19, contending that no presumption can be drawn under Section 90 of the Indian Evidence Act even though the certified copy of the old original document of the executant

Union of India Vs. Ibrahim UddIn and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure(CPC) 1908 - Order 41 Rule 27, Order 7 Rule 17, Section 100; Indian Evidence Act, 1872 - Section 114(g), 58, 17 to 31, 68, 65, 74, 90; Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Section 34 ; Cantonment Act, 1924 - Section 43A

outside the notified area and to establish that such area was declared under Section 43A of the Cantonment Act, 1924. In the circumstances, I do not find that it is a case where this court in exercise of … title of the plaintiff/respondent No.1 over the suit property as the pedigree has not been proved. Presumption under Section 90 of the Evidence Act in respect of 30 years' old document coming from proper custody relates to the … to be ignored altogether and making reference to the record of the Cantonment Board. In case, the Union of India did not produce the revenue

Vidarbja Coal Supply Company Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Other Taxes

Acts : Cantonments Act, 1924 - Sections 60 and 284; Maharashtra Municiplalities Act , 1965 - Sections 105; Central Provinces and Berar Municipalities Act, 1922 - Sections 66(1); Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957 - Sections 178; Uttar Pradesh Municipalities Act - Sections 128(1); Karnataka Municipalities Act, 1964 - Sections 124; Madras General Sales Tax Act - Sections 41(2); Bihar and Orissa Excise Act - Sections 90; Calcutta Municipal Act, 1951; Copyright Act - Sections 51 and 53; Teminal Tax Rules - Rule 1; Karnataka Municipalities Taxation Rules, 1965 - Rule 26; Constitution of India - Article 265

Reported in : 1987(3)BomCR502; 1987MhLJ748

Kamptee unde its Octroi Bye-laws 1986 framed by virtue of authority conferred under S./ 284 (1) of the Cantonments Act, 1924 (Act NO. 2 of 19240).2. Relevant facts are few. The petitioner has taken the contract of transporting coalformKamptee … Question arose whether levymade under R. 111 of the Rules under S,. 90 of the Bihar and Orissa Excise Act for a license to possess … had their terminus else where. ...................................... Keeping inview the terms and language and the legislative history of the Section 66(1) we are unable to enlarge the terms of the section by were construction so as to include

Cantonment Board Vs. St. John's School and Anr.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Municipal Tax

Acts : Cantonments Act, 1924 - Sections 87 and 99(2)

Reported in : 2002(4)AWC2795; (2002)2UPLBEC1892

passed by Additional District Judge, Meerut by which he has allowed an appeal under Section 84 of the Cantonments Act, 1924 (in short 'the Act') setting aside notice dated 24.3.1988 levying property tax on Bungalow No. 117 Bank Street,

Chotanagpur Motor Kamgar Union Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Motor VehiclesCivil

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; ;Cantonments Act, 1924 - Sections 108; Cantonment Rules, 1925 - Rule 6

Reported in : [2004(2)JCR140(Jhr)]

preliminary objection of maintainability of writ petition at the instance of the petitioner, referred Section 117(b) of the Cantonments Act, 1924 wherein the Cantonment Board have been empowered to construct, establish or maintain public parks, gardens, offices, diaries, bathing … to the Central Government: It was communicated by Government of India, Ministry of Defence by letter No. 714/16/L/DE/ 90/145/DO(V)/D(L), dated 20th February, 2001, as quoted hereunder : 'No. 714/16/L/DE/90/145/ DO(V)/ D(L)Government of IndiaMinistry of DefenceNew Delhi. The

Shanmugadurai Vs. State of Tamil Nadu Rep. by Its Secretary and Commis ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Property

Acts : Constitution of India -- Article 14; Land Acquisition Act, 1894 -- Sections 4(1); Tamil Nadu Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1978 -- Sections 5-A and 6; Town and Country planning Act, 1971 -- Sections 17, 26, 27, 28 and 36 -- Rule 3; Tamil Nadu Housing Board Act -- Sections 70; Cantonment Act, 1924 -- Sections 12(3)

Reported in : 1999(2)CTC522

1990 are required to necessarily specify the purpose for which land is needed vis-a-vis the provisions of the Cantonment Act, 1924. It is true that when acquisition of the land was within the limits specified under Section … are required to necessarily specify the purpose for which land is needed vis-a-vis the provisions of the Cantonment Act, 1924. It is true that when acquisition of the land was within the limits specified under Section 4 and … Housing and Urban Development Department, dated 14.6.90 and letter No. 51813/UD-III (1) 90-2, dated 15.10.90 the Government have the amount of Rs. 200 lakhs. The

Dr. Rajesh Kapoor vs.delhi Cantonment Board and Anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Copy of the JE’s report has been annexed as Annexure A8. to j. Notice u/s 185 of the Cantonments Act, 1924 was issued the... Petitioner on 15.03.2004 and 16.06.2004 against which he has preferred appeal before the competent authority. … a period of 30 years, renewable at the option of lessee upto 90 years w.e.f 09.06.1932. The said lease was granted for the purpose of … It was the submission of Mr. Vikas Dhawan, learned counsel for the petitioner that the impugned order under section 249(1) of the Act is in violation of the principle of natural justice, inasmuch as the petitioner has

M/S. Dewan and Sons Investments Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Delhi Development Author ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Property

Acts : Delhi Development Act, 1957 - Sections 7, 12 and 14; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 54; Constitution of India - Article 226; Cantonments Act, 1924 - Sections 180-A and 183-A; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 25(O)

Reported in : AIR1997Delhi388

Cantt. Board v. M.P.J. Builders. : AIR1996SC2645 , is a case under Ss. 180-A to 183-A of the Cantonments Act. 1924. Sanction for building was allowed but it could not be completed within the time allowed. A fresh sanction … authority without compliance with the requirement of S. 12 even after the coming into operation of the provisions.'8.1 Section 14 of the Delhi Development Act. 1957 is of equal importance in the present context which reads as

P.K. Narayanan and anr. Etc. Vs. State of Kerala and ors.

Court : Kerala

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Central Government Account Receipts and Payment Rules - Rules 70, 79 and 79(1); Kerala Panchayats Act, 1960 - Sections 69A

Reported in : AIR1992Ker148

can mean only this is India a permanent military station. The definition of this word 'cantonment' in the Cantonments Act, 1924 (Central Act 2/1924) may also be considered in this context with profit. It reads:--'The Central Government may, by … 79(1) of the Central Government Account Receipts and Payments Rules, for short, The Central Rules and not under Section 69A of The Kerala Panchayat Act, 1960, for short, The Panchayat Act, introduced by the Local Authorities (Amendment)

A.P. Sarpanches Association and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Election

Acts : Andhra Pradesh Legislative Council Act, 2005 - Sections 4; Representation of People Act, 1950 - Sections 15, 16, 18, 22, 23, 27, 27(1) and 27(2); Andhra Pradesh Panchayat Raj Act, 1994 - Sections 2(17), 2(18), 2(23), 2(45), 6, 8, 11, 12, 14(1), 45, 117, 140, 148, 148(1), 149(1), 150, 151, 161, 177(1), 177(2), 177(3), 178, 179, 192 and 222; Representation of People (Amendment) Act, 1963; Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Act, 1955 - Sections 1A, 1B, 1C, 5 and 8 to 12; Andhra Pradesh Municipalities Act, 1965 - Sections 8 to 12; Cantonments Act, 1924; Cantonments Act, 2006; Municipal Corporations Act, 1994; Andhra Pradesh Districts (Formation) Act, 1974 - Sections 3; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 169, 169(1), 171, 171(1) to 171(4), 243, 243A, 243B, 243E, 243G, 243K, 243P and 243Q

Reported in : AIR2007AP273; 2007(4)ALD783; 2007(5)ALT707

owe their existence to the Andhra Pradesh Municipalities Act, 1965, the Cantonment Boards owe their existence to the Cantonments Act, 1924 (The 1924 Act has been repealed by the Cantonments Act, 2006), and Zilla Parishads and Mandal Parishads owe … relating to Bihar, the following entry shall be inserted, namely:'1. Andhra Pradesh 90 8 31 12'31 8(b) in the Fourth Schedule, before the heading 'BIHAR', … as of right is the moot question which arises for determination in this petition filed for striking down Section 4(b) of the Andhra Pradesh Legislative Council Act, 2005 (for short, 'the 2005 Act') and for issue of