Advanced Search Results

Punam Chand Vs. State and anr.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1953CriLJ236

the Court of Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Mhow Cantonment. The petitioner was convicted as stated above.4. Section 103 of the Cantonments Act, 1924, runs as follows:The Executive Officer may, by written notice, call upon any inhabitant of the Cantonment to furnish … a procedure about appeals in Sections 84 to 88 and about payment and recovering of taxes in Sections 89 to 96. Then there is a heading 'Special provisions relating to taxation' and Sections 97 to 105 cover

The Western India theatres Ltd. Vs. the Cantonment Board, Poona, Canto ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Other Taxes

Reported in : (1959)61BOMLR950

issued by the respondent whereby, in exercise of the powers conferred on it by Section 60 of the Cantonments Act, 1924 (II of 1924), the respondent proposed to make, with the previous sanction of the Central Government, certain amendments … decree of the Court of Civil Judge, Senior Division, Poona, dated July 31, 1951, in Special Suit No. 89 of 1950 and dismissing the appellant's suit against the respondent with costs throughout. This appeal has been filed

Ram Pratap and Others Vs. State of U.P. and Others

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Property

Acts : Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 4, 4(1), 5, 5A, 6, 9, 9(3) and 17; Uttar Pradesh Urban Land Ceiling and Regulation Act, 1976; Cantonment Act, 1924

Reported in : 1999(3)AWC2049; (1999)2UPLBEC1452

exactness, it should be left to the military and the local body, the Cantonment, functioning under the Cantonment Act. 1924. Suffice it to say that the park may be expanded beyond the Macpherson Park and around the Macpherson … Officer (NagarMahapalika). Allahabad. (4)Allahabad Development Authority,through its Chairman, (5) Ministry ofDefence, through its Secretary, (6)Sub-Area Commander, Allahabad and(7) Cantonment Board. Allahabad.The petitioners contend, all of them.that they are Bhumidhars inpossession. The petitioner Nos. 1. 2and 3 contend … village. Theycontend it was only on 17 January,1988, when a notice under Section 9(3) of the Act had been left in thevillage but not served

Agricultural Produce Market Committee, Narela, Delhi Vs. Commissioner ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2(1), 10, 10(20), 10(26AAB) and 260A; Finance Act, 2002; Cantonments Act, 1924 - Sections 3; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 3(31); Delhi Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation) Act, 1998 - Sections 5, 22(1), 22(2), 62 65, 88, 88(1), 88(2) and 88(3); Delhi Development Act, 1957; Payment of Bonus Act, 1965 - Sections 32; Constitution of India (Seventy-third Amendment) Act, 1992; Constitution of India (Seventy-fourth Amendment) Act, 1992; Constitution of India - Articles 243, 243P, 243 and 243ZF

Reported in : (2008)218CTR(SC)433; [2008]305ITR1(SC); JT2008(10)SC17; 2008(11)SCALE540; (2008)9SCC434; 2008AIRSCW6285; 2008(6)Supreme520; 2008(11)SCALE540

management of a Municipal or local fund; or (iv) Cantonment Board as defined in Section 3 of the Cantonments Act, 1924 (2 of 1924);12. Mr. M.L. Verma, learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of the appellants, submitted that AMC(s)

Dilip Baruah Vs. State of Assam and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 38, 38(1) and 38(2), 41, 51, 226, 256 and 356;; Disabilities (Equal opportunities, Protection of Rights and Full Participation) Act, 1995 - Sections 2, 32 and 33;; Cantonment Act, 1924

(i) in relation to the Central Govt. or any establishment whollyor substantially financed by the Government, or a Cantonment Board constituted under the Cantonment Act, 1924 the Central Government; (ii) in relation to a State Government or … Govt. or any establishment whollyor substantially financed by the Government, or a Cantonment Board constituted under the Cantonment Act, 1924 the Central Government; (ii) in relation to a State Government or any establishment wholly or substantially financed by … hand.10. The appropriate Govt. mentioned in this Act is also defined under section 2(a), which are as follows: -'2(a) appropriate Govt. means:- (i) in relation

Dr. Rajesh Kapoor vs.delhi Cantonment Board and Anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Copy of the JE’s report has been annexed as Annexure A8. to j. Notice u/s 185 of the Cantonments Act, 1924 was issued the... Petitioner on 15.03.2004 and 16.06.2004 against which he has preferred appeal before the competent authority. … It was the submission of Mr. Vikas Dhawan, learned counsel for the petitioner that the impugned order under section 249(1) of the Act is in violation of the principle of natural justice, inasmuch as the petitioner has

P.K. Narayanan and anr. Etc. Vs. State of Kerala and ors.

Court : Kerala

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Central Government Account Receipts and Payment Rules - Rules 70, 79 and 79(1); Kerala Panchayats Act, 1960 - Sections 69A

Reported in : AIR1992Ker148

can mean only this is India a permanent military station. The definition of this word 'cantonment' in the Cantonments Act, 1924 (Central Act 2/1924) may also be considered in this context with profit. It reads:--'The Central Government may, by … 79(1) of the Central Government Account Receipts and Payments Rules, for short, The Central Rules and not under Section 69A of The Kerala Panchayat Act, 1960, for short, The Panchayat Act, introduced by the Local Authorities (Amendment)

Union of India and ors. Vs. Vasavi Co-op. Housing Society Ltd. and ors

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

in the context of the history of the Secunderabad Cantonment. Reference was made to the provisions of Cantonment Act, 1924 and it was pointed out that the Secunderabad and Aurangabad Cantonment Land Administration Rules, 1930 do not apply … to A-85 and Exs. X-1 to X-10 besides Exs. A-86 to A- 89 on behalf of DW1. On behalf of the defendants DW1 was examined … and 51 guntas, out of Survey No.1, 60 and 61 of Kakaguda village comprising G.L.R. Survey No.445 of Cantonment belongs to the first Defendant, which is locally managed and possessed by Defendant No.3 being local representative of … a certificate as per the plan prepared by the Revenue Records under Section 19(v) of the Urban Land Ceiling Act. Plaintiff further stated that pending

Dilip Baruah Vs. State of Assam and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 38, 38(1) and 38(2), 41, 51, 226, 256 and 356; Disabilities (Equal opportunities, Protection of Rights and Full Participation) Act, 1995 - Sections 2, 32 and 33; Cantonment Act, 1924

(i) in relation to the Central Govt. or any establishment whollyor substantially financed by the Government, or a Cantonment Board constituted under the Cantonment Act, 1924 the Central Government; (ii) in relation to a State Government or … Govt. or any establishment whollyor substantially financed by the Government, or a Cantonment Board constituted under the Cantonment Act, 1924 the Central Government; (ii) in relation to a State Government or any establishment wholly or substantially financed by … 10. The appropriate Govt. mentioned in this Act is also defined under section 2(a), which are as follows: - '2(a) appropriate Govt. means:- (i) in

Secretary to Government of India, Ministry of Defence and anr. Vs. Ind ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Property

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 3, Rule 2; Cantonments Act, 1924; Cantonments Rules, 1925; Land Revenue Act; Land Regulations; Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 34; Practice of Civil Rules - Rule 32

Reported in : AIR2003AP329; 2003(4)ALD302

Register held that there is no statutory base for the General Statutory Register since the whole of the Cantonments Act, 1924 and the Rules framed in 1925 are not applicable to the Secunderabad Cantonment and they were applicable only … which are dealt with seriatum.9. The first contention raised by the learned Standing Counsel is that notice under Section 80 of Code of Civil Procedure Code (for short 'the Code') was not issued by the plaintiffs and