Advanced Search Results

Kunj Bihari Vs. Special Judicial Magistrate Ii and ors.

Court : Uttaranchal

Subject : CivilConstitution

Acts : Cantonments Act, 1924 - Sections 60, 63, 82, 83, 84, 84(2), 85, 86, 87, 88, 92A, 116, 117 and 259; Cantonments (Amendment) Act, 1983; National Highways Act, 1956 - Sections 4 to 7; National Highways (Land and Traffic) Act, 2002 - Sections 15; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 397, 397(1) and 398; Constitution of India - Articles 226, 227, 301, 302, 303 and 305; Constitution of India (Fourth Amendment) Act, 1955

Reported in : 2005(2)AWC1363(UHC); (2005)2UPLBEC41

hold that the remedy of filing a revision was available to the petitioner, which he had not availed.6. Section 83 of the Cantonments Act, 1924, which empowers the Cantonment Board regarding lease of octroi, terminal tax or toll, … Procedure, 1973. There is yet another preliminary objection raised in the counter-affidavit that under Section 84 of the Cantonments Act, 1924 (Act No. 2 of 1924), the remedy of appeal was available to the petitioner against the levy of

Punam Chand Vs. State and anr.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1953CriLJ236

the Court of Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Mhow Cantonment. The petitioner was convicted as stated above.4. Section 103 of the Cantonments Act, 1924, runs as follows:The Executive Officer may, by written notice, call upon any inhabitant of the Cantonment to furnish … The collection of octroi, terminal tax and toll can be leased by the Board for one year under Section 83. If the contractor makes default in payment of the contract amount, he can be sued for money due

All India Federation of Tax Practitioners and ors. Vs. Union of India ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service TaxConstitution

Acts : Finance Act, 1994 - Sections 65, 65(16), 66, 67, 68, 71, 72, 73 and 83; Finance (No. 2) Act, 1998; Constitution (Eighty-eighth Amendment) Act, 2003; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 2, 3, 9C, 9D and 11B; Income Tax Act, 1961; Medicinal Act, 1955; Kerala Abkari Act; Cantonments Act, 1924 - Sections 60; Government of India Act, 1935 - Sections 100 and 142A; Uttar Pradesh Tax on Luxuries Act, 1995; Andhra Pradesh Tax on Luxuries Act, 1987; West Bengal Luxury Tax Act, 1994; Haryana Passengers and Goods Taxation Act, 1952 - Sections 3(3); Constitution of India - Articles 19(1), 245, 246, 246(1), 246(3), 248, 265, 268A, 269, 276, 276(1), 276(2), 276(3) and 366(29A)

Reported in : AIR2007SC2990; (2008)5CompLJ488(SC); (2007)211CTR(SC)449; 2007(120)ECC451; 2007LC451(SC); [2007]293ITR406(SC); JT2007(10)SC305; (2007)6MLJ1062(SC); 2007(10)SCALE178; 2007(7)SCC527

cinematograph films. A notice was issued to the appellant by the Cantonment Board under Section 60 of the Cantonments Act, 1924 imposing tax on entertainments. The said levy was challenged on the ground that under Section 100 of the … assessment. Section 72 dealt with best judgment assessment. Section 73 dealt with value of taxable services escaping assessment. Section 83 inter alia stated that Section 9C, 9D, 11B etc. of the Central Excise Act shall apply also to

Pune Cantonment Board and Another Vs. Bharat Forge Co. Ltd.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Cantonments Act, 1924 - Sections 60, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71 and 72; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Companies Act, 1956; Bombay Municipal Boroughs Act, 1925 - Sections 78, 82(3), 83(3) and 123(1)

Reported in : AIR1998Bom53; 1998(1)BomCR692; (1998)1BOMLR812; 1998(2)MhLj445

hereby quashed and set aside. Rule is made absolute accordingly. No order as to costs.18. Petition succeed. Cantonment Act (1924), Section 71 - Expression 'At Any Time'- Power to amend assessment list - Power to recover tax for years … ORDERA.P. Shah, J.1. This petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India by the Pune Cantonment Board and its Executive Officer is directed against the judgment and order dated 21st October 1986 passed by … said Act, the Full Bench held that an alteration made under section 83(3) of the Bombay Municipal Boroughs Act in the assessment list prepared under

Pune Cantonment Board and Another Vs. M.P.J. Builders and Another

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Property

Acts : Cantonments Act, 1924 - Sections 52(1), 180-A, 181-A and 183-A; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 1996VIAD(SC)102; AIR1996SC2645; (1990)3CompLJ362(SC); JT1996(7)SC123; 1996(5)SCALE713; (1996)5SCC438; [1996]Supp4SCR512

House No. 2, Sholapur Bazar Road, Pune, which falls within the area of Pune Cantonment governed by the Cantonments Act, 1924 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act').2. The respondent No. 1 was granted a building sanction under Section 181

Usman Gani J. Khatri of Bombay and ors. Vs. Cantonment Board and Other ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Property

Acts : Cantonments Act, 1924 - Sections 43A, 179, 181(6), 186, 274 and 283; Cantonment Land Administration Rules, 1937 - Rule 2

Reported in : AIR1994SC233; JT1992(4)SC538; 1992(1)SCALE1068; (1992)3SCC455; [1992]3SCR1; 1992(2)LC441(SC)

No. 30 dated nil month April, 1981 resolved that the plans be sanctioned under Section 181 of the Cantonments Act, 1924 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') subject to AHO's No Objection. It was clearly mentioned in the aforesaid

Ram Pratap and Others Vs. State of U.P. and Others

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Property

Acts : Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 4, 4(1), 5, 5A, 6, 9, 9(3) and 17; Uttar Pradesh Urban Land Ceiling and Regulation Act, 1976; Cantonment Act, 1924

Reported in : 1999(3)AWC2049; (1999)2UPLBEC1452

exactness, it should be left to the military and the local body, the Cantonment, functioning under the Cantonment Act. 1924. Suffice it to say that the park may be expanded beyond the Macpherson Park and around the Macpherson … theIndian Evidence Act. 1872, gives themsanctity as official documents underSections 78, 81. 83 and 87. No personnor the Court can ignore these maps.The presumption is … Officer (NagarMahapalika). Allahabad. (4)Allahabad Development Authority,through its Chairman, (5) Ministry ofDefence, through its Secretary, (6)Sub-Area Commander, Allahabad and(7) Cantonment Board. Allahabad.The petitioners contend, all of them.that they are Bhumidhars inpossession. The petitioner Nos. 1. 2and 3 contend … village. Theycontend it was only on 17 January,1988, when a notice under Section 9(3) of the Act had been left in thevillage but not served

Jayantilal Bachubhai Vadiwala and Etc. Vs. the Competent Authority and ...

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Property

Acts : Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 - Sections 2, 3, 4, 6(1), 8, 11, 12, 12(1), 12(4), 12(5), 30, 30(1), 30(4), 33, 33(1), 46 and 46(2); Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Rule, 1976 - Rule 15A; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 227; Wealth Tax Act, 1957; Cantonment Act, 1924; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 41, Rule 27

Reported in : AIR1995Guj25; (1995)1GLR831

be as specified in column '4' of the Second Schedule except in relation to lands or buildings in cantonment declared as such under the Cantonment Act, 1924. Part I of the Second Schedule refers to the appellate … the Second Schedule except in relation to lands or buildings in cantonment declared as such under the Cantonment Act, 1924. Part I of the Second Schedule refers to the appellate authority with respect to each State. The State … that each petitioner filed his respective statement in the prescribed form under Section 6(1) of the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 (the Act … (respondent No. 1 herein) on 31st March 1983 in cases Nos. 93, 83,25 and 26 all of 1982 as affirmed in appeal by the common

K. Parameshwaran Vs. Income-tax Officer

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Madras

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (1982)2ITD371(Mad.)

is the head of the deliberative wing as also the chief executive.12. The cantonments are governed by the Cantonments Act, 1924 constituting Boards. They are sub-divided into the following categories : 13. Regarding Panchayat system, we came across a … Musiri was only a town panchayat and was not a municipality within the meaning of the term in Section 2(14) (iii) (a) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 ('the Act'). The assessee did not dispute that the population

M/S. Dewan and Sons Investments Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Delhi Development Author ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Property

Acts : Delhi Development Act, 1957 - Sections 7, 12 and 14; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 54; Constitution of India - Article 226; Cantonments Act, 1924 - Sections 180-A and 183-A; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 25(O)

Reported in : AIR1997Delhi388

Cantt. Board v. M.P.J. Builders. : AIR1996SC2645 , is a case under Ss. 180-A to 183-A of the Cantonments Act. 1924. Sanction for building was allowed but it could not be completed within the time allowed. A fresh sanction … the plot in question with ground coverage of 33.33% : FAR of 83 and height 12.5 meters. It is stated in the counter that due … authority without compliance with the requirement of S. 12 even after the coming into operation of the provisions.'8.1 Section 14 of the Delhi Development Act. 1957 is of equal importance in the present context which reads as