Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: cantonments act 1924 section 82 · Page 1 of about 35 results (0.034 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Oct 04 2001

State of Jharkhand and anr. Vs. Mukesh Prasad and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Oct-04-2001

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Cantonments Act, 1924 - Sections 60, 60(1), 61 and 62; Bihar and Orissa Municipal Act, 1922 - Sections 82, 137, 138 and 356; Madhya Pradesh Municipalities Act, 1961 - Sections 127 and 127(1); Madhya Pradesh Motor Vehicles Taxation Act, 1947 - Sections 3, 3(2) and 6

Reported in : II(2002)ACC184; 2002(50)BLJR169

facts leading to the filing of this appeal are that Ramgarh Cantonment Board, a Board constituted under the Cantonments Act, 1924, in purported exercise of the power allegedly vested in it under Section 60 of the Cantonments Act, 1924, … there were a Municipality for that area), we have to advert to Bihar & Orissa Municipal Act, 1922. Section 82 of 1922 Act falls in Chapter IV which deals with the subject of 'Municipal Taxation'. Part I of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 11 2008

Ramgarh Cantonment Board and anr. Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-11-2008

Subject : Other Taxes

Acts : Cantonments Act, 1924 - Sections 60 and 60(1); Bihar and Orissa Municipal Act, 1922 - Sections 3(30), 3(30A), 82, 137, 138, 150, 326 and 356; Madhya Pradesh Municipalities Act, 1961 - Sections 127 and 127(1); Madhya Pradesh Motor Vehicles Taxation Act - Sections 3(2)

Reported in : JT2008(3)SC590; 2008(4)SCALE162; (2008)11SCC223; (2008)15VST550(SC); 2008AIRSCW2223

or authority to levy tax on entry of mechanically propelled vehicles, the Cantonment Board cannot exercise those powers. CANTONMENTS ACT, 1924. Section 60 & Bihar & Orissa Municipal Act (7 of 1922), Sections 82 & 137: [Ashok Bhan &Dalveer Bhandari,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 11 2005

Kunj Bihari Vs. Special Judicial Magistrate Ii and ors.

Court : Uttaranchal

Decided on : Apr-11-2005

Subject : CivilConstitution

Acts : Cantonments Act, 1924 - Sections 60, 63, 82, 83, 84, 84(2), 85, 86, 87, 88, 92A, 116, 117 and 259; Cantonments (Amendment) Act, 1983; National Highways Act, 1956 - Sections 4 to 7; National Highways (Land and Traffic) Act, 2002 - Sections 15; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 397, 397(1) and 398; Constitution of India - Articles 226, 227, 301, 302, 303 and 305; Constitution of India (Fourth Amendment) Act, 1955

Reported in : 2005(2)AWC1363(UHC); (2005)2UPLBEC41

Procedure, 1973. There is yet another preliminary objection raised in the counter-affidavit that under Section 84 of the Cantonments Act, 1924 (Act No. 2 of 1924), the remedy of appeal was available to the petitioner against the levy of … it was a State Highway. On 21.12.2004, the Executive Officer, Cantonment Board, Dehradun exercising its powers conferred under Section 82 of the Cantonment Act, 1924 (Act No. 2 of 1924) submitted a complaint against the petitioner before the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jun 17 1997

Pune Cantonment Board and Another Vs. Bharat Forge Co. Ltd.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jun-17-1997

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Cantonments Act, 1924 - Sections 60, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71 and 72; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Companies Act, 1956; Bombay Municipal Boroughs Act, 1925 - Sections 78, 82(3), 83(3) and 123(1)

Reported in : AIR1998Bom53; 1998(1)BomCR692; (1998)1BOMLR812; 1998(2)MhLj445

hereby quashed and set aside. Rule is made absolute accordingly. No order as to costs.18. Petition succeed. Cantonment Act (1924), Section 71 - Expression 'At Any Time'- Power to amend assessment list - Power to recover tax for years … Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India by the Pune Cantonment Board and its Executive Officer is directed against the judgment and order … it is seen that the judgment is mainly based upon interpretation of the expression 'current official year' in section 82(3) of that Act, It was interpreted to mean the earliest day in the official year which is current

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 01 1977

Hanifabi Vs. Kamal and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-01-1977

Subject : Election

Acts : Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1959 - Sections 14, 15(1) and 15(2); Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958 - Sections 15; Representation of People Act, 1951 - Sections 37 and 82; Cantonments Act, 1924 - Sections 31; Bombay Village Panchayats Election Rules, 1959 - Rules 8, 10, 11, 12(4), 13, 14, 43 and 47; Rajasthan Town Municipalities Act, 1951 - Sections 19

Reported in : AIR1978Bom283; 1977MhLJ673

Courtin Vishwa Mitra v. District Judge, Jhansi : AIR1956All89 . It was a case of an election under Cantonments Act (1924), Section 31. It was held that a candidate at the election includes candidate whose nomination paper was rejected. The … persons were also necessary parties and that their nonjoinder rendered the petition liable for dismissal in view of Section 82 of the Act. It was argued before the Supreme Court that this view was erroneous and that the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 08 1951

Punam Chand Vs. State and anr.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Nov-08-1951

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1953CriLJ236

the Court of Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Mhow Cantonment. The petitioner was convicted as stated above.4. Section 103 of the Cantonments Act, 1924, runs as follows:The Executive Officer may, by written notice, call upon any inhabitant of the Cantonment to furnish … Any evasion of octroi, terminal tax, or toll, or any attempt at evasion is especially dealt with under Section 82 and is made punishable with fine which may extend either to ten times the value of such octroi,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 01 1992

Usman Gani J. Khatri of Bombay and ors. Vs. Cantonment Board and Other ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : May-01-1992

Subject : Property

Acts : Cantonments Act, 1924 - Sections 43A, 179, 181(6), 186, 274 and 283; Cantonment Land Administration Rules, 1937 - Rule 2

Reported in : AIR1994SC233; JT1992(4)SC538; 1992(1)SCALE1068; (1992)3SCC455; [1992]3SCR1; 1992(2)LC441(SC)

No. 30 dated nil month April, 1981 resolved that the plans be sanctioned under Section 181 of the Cantonments Act, 1924 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') subject to AHO's No Objection. It was clearly mentioned in the aforesaid

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 25 2003

Baljit Singh Bedi Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Apr-25-2003

Subject : Property

Acts : Cantonment Land Administration Rules, 1925 - Rule 3; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2003(2)BLJR1554; [2003(3)JCR312(Jhr)]

the Cantonment Land Administration Rules, 1925 framed in exercise of the power under Section 280 of the Cantonment Act, 1924 the Military Estate Officer of the Cantonment shall prepare and maintain General Land Register of all lands in … No. 1178 of Khata No. 358 situate in Mauza Ramgarh, Thana No. 82 is recorded as Keshare Hind Land in the record of rights and … in the Khatiyan and the said land has not been settled by the Government in favour of Ramgarh Cantonment Board and as such Executive Officer of Ramgarh Cantonment Board has got no right to auction Keshare Hind

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 09 1996

Pune Cantonment Board and Another Vs. M.P.J. Builders and Another

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-09-1996

Subject : Property

Acts : Cantonments Act, 1924 - Sections 52(1), 180-A, 181-A and 183-A; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 1996VIAD(SC)102; AIR1996SC2645; (1990)3CompLJ362(SC); JT1996(7)SC123; 1996(5)SCALE713; (1996)5SCC438; [1996]Supp4SCR512

House No. 2, Sholapur Bazar Road, Pune, which falls within the area of Pune Cantonment governed by the Cantonments Act, 1924 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act').2. The respondent No. 1 was granted a building sanction under Section 181

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 07 2014

Union of India and ors. Vs. Vasavi Co-op. Housing Society Ltd. and ors

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jan-07-2014

Subject : Land Acquisition

in the context of the history of the Secunderabad Cantonment. Reference was made to the provisions of Cantonment Act, 1924 and it was pointed out that the Secunderabad and Aurangabad Cantonment Land Administration Rules, 1930 do not apply … and 51 guntas, out of Survey No.1, 60 and 61 of Kakaguda village comprising G.L.R. Survey No.445 of Cantonment belongs to the first Defendant, which is locally managed and possessed by Defendant No.3 being local representative of … a certificate as per the plan prepared by the Revenue Records under Section 19(v) of the Urban Land Ceiling Act. Plaintiff further stated that pending

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial