Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: cantonments act 1924 section 72 · Page 1 of about 42 results (0.038 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jun 17 1997

Pune Cantonment Board and Another Vs. Bharat Forge Co. Ltd.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jun-17-1997

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Cantonments Act, 1924 - Sections 60, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71 and 72; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Companies Act, 1956; Bombay Municipal Boroughs Act, 1925 - Sections 78, 82(3), 83(3) and 123(1)

Reported in : AIR1998Bom53; 1998(1)BomCR692; (1998)1BOMLR812; 1998(2)MhLj445

hereby quashed and set aside. Rule is made absolute accordingly. No order as to costs.18. Petition succeed. Cantonment Act (1924), Section 71 - Expression 'At Any Time'- Power to amend assessment list - Power to recover tax for years … buildings or lands, of the amount ofeach such tax leviable thereon during the year to which such list relates.'Section 72 says that it is not necessary to prepare a list every year, however it casts an obligation on … Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India by the Pune Cantonment Board and its Executive Officer is directed against the judgment and order

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 06 1999

Smt. Sunita Rani Vs. Xviiith Additional District Judge and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Sep-06-1999

Subject : Municipal Tax

Acts : Cantonment Act, 1924 - Sections 65, 65(1), 65(3), 68 and 68(1)

Reported in : AIR2000All25

the learned counsel for the petitioner is that in view of the provisions of Section 68(1) of the Cantonments Act, 1924 (hereinafter called as the Act) before revision of the assessment a notice in writing of the revision was … per annum.2. The averments contained in the writ petition are that the petitioner was tenant of House No. 72, Guru Nanakpuri (Tandel Mohalla), B. C. Bazar, Meerut Cantt. at the rate of Rs. 12/- per month since

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 25 1984

Sri Ram Mahadeo Flour and Oil Mills Vs. the Cantonment Board and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jul-25-1984

Subject : Municipal Tax

Acts : Cantonments Act, 1924 - Sections 84, 85, 86, 87 and 88

Reported in : AIR1984All384

are subjected to house tax and water tax by the Kanpur Cantonment Board under the provisions of the Cantonments Act, 1924. In respect of assessment year 197l-72 the amount initially demanded as house tax and water tax was deposited … against the assessment or levy or refusal to refund any tax under the Cantonments Act are contained in Sections 84 to 88 of the Act. Section 84 enables a person aggrieved by any assessment or levy or

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jul 28 1980

Har Gopal Jaiswal and anr. Vs. the Cantonment Board, Kanpur and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jul-28-1980

Subject : Municipal Tax

Acts : Cantonments Act, 1924 - Sections 69, 71 71(1) and 88

Reported in : AIR1981All29

without depositing the disputed amount of tax. The petitioners also moved an application under Section 71 of the Cantonments Act, 1924 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) claiming amendment of the assessment list prepared by the Board, whereunder they … of any period prior to the commencement of the year in which the assessment is made.(la) to (2) ....'Section 72 of the Act obliges the Board to prepare a new assessment list at least once in every three

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 27 2012

A.K.Tyagi Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-27-2012

Subject : Right to Information

framed against the petitioner:- (i) The appellant while functioning as Store Keeper violated provisions of Rule 72 of Cantonments Accounts Code 1924 and thus had committed gross misconduct, neglect of duty, indiscipline and loss of confidence, violating … the same in Court proceedings. He had thus violated the provisions of Section 5 of the Official Secret's Act 1923, disclosure of secrets / confidential information and betrayal of confidence in due discharge of his official duty.”

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 11 2005

Kunj Bihari Vs. Special Judicial Magistrate Ii and ors.

Court : Uttaranchal

Decided on : Apr-11-2005

Subject : CivilConstitution

Acts : Cantonments Act, 1924 - Sections 60, 63, 82, 83, 84, 84(2), 85, 86, 87, 88, 92A, 116, 117 and 259; Cantonments (Amendment) Act, 1983; National Highways Act, 1956 - Sections 4 to 7; National Highways (Land and Traffic) Act, 2002 - Sections 15; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 397, 397(1) and 398; Constitution of India - Articles 226, 227, 301, 302, 303 and 305; Constitution of India (Fourth Amendment) Act, 1955

Reported in : 2005(2)AWC1363(UHC); (2005)2UPLBEC41

Procedure, 1973. There is yet another preliminary objection raised in the counter-affidavit that under Section 84 of the Cantonments Act, 1924 (Act No. 2 of 1924), the remedy of appeal was available to the petitioner against the levy of … the vehicle between Dehradun and Dakpathar. The road between Dehradun and Dakpathar is part of National Highway No. 72. This National Highway No. 72 (for brevity hereinafter NH-72) starts from Rishikesh with terminal point at Ambala. The

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 06 2012

Smt Nazneen P. Bapooji Rep by Her Gpa Sr Vs. the Ceo, Secunderabad Can ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Dec-06-2012

Subject : Land Acquisition

own properties within the jurisdiction of the Secunderabad Cantonment Board (for short "the Board") constituted under the erstwhile Cantonments Act 1924 ( for short "the 1924 Act" ) which was later repealed and replaced by the Cantonments Act, 2006( … Under 1924 Act, the provisions relating to assessment of the property tax are contained under Section 66 to Section 72. Section 66 of the 1924 Act provides that when tax assessed on the annual value of buildings or

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 28 1999

Ram Pratap and Others Vs. State of U.P. and Others

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : May-28-1999

Subject : Property

Acts : Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 4, 4(1), 5, 5A, 6, 9, 9(3) and 17; Uttar Pradesh Urban Land Ceiling and Regulation Act, 1976; Cantonment Act, 1924

Reported in : 1999(3)AWC2049; (1999)2UPLBEC1452

exactness, it should be left to the military and the local body, the Cantonment, functioning under the Cantonment Act. 1924. Suffice it to say that the park may be expanded beyond the Macpherson Park and around the Macpherson … 2and 3 contend that they areBfiumidhars in possession of plot No.520. measuring 72 Biswas 16Biswansis. plot No. 526. measuring 1Bigha 9 Biswa and plot No. … Officer (NagarMahapalika). Allahabad. (4)Allahabad Development Authority,through its Chairman, (5) Ministry ofDefence, through its Secretary, (6)Sub-Area Commander, Allahabad and(7) Cantonment Board. Allahabad.The petitioners contend, all of them.that they are Bhumidhars inpossession. The petitioner Nos. 1. 2and 3 contend … village. Theycontend it was only on 17 January,1988, when a notice under Section 9(3) of the Act had been left in thevillage but not served

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 13 2003

Secretary to Government of India, Ministry of Defence and anr. Vs. Ind ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Mar-13-2003

Subject : Property

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 3, Rule 2; Cantonments Act, 1924; Cantonments Rules, 1925; Land Revenue Act; Land Regulations; Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 34; Practice of Civil Rules - Rule 32

Reported in : AIR2003AP329; 2003(4)ALD302

Register held that there is no statutory base for the General Statutory Register since the whole of the Cantonments Act, 1924 and the Rules framed in 1925 are not applicable to the Secunderabad Cantonment and they were applicable only … which are dealt with seriatum.9. The first contention raised by the learned Standing Counsel is that notice under Section 80 of Code of Civil Procedure Code (for short 'the Code') was not issued by the plaintiffs and

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 11 2022

Vikas Singh Vs. Govt. Of Nct Of Delhi

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-11-2022

Subject : Land Acquisition

the Delhi Fire Service Act defines ‘building bye-laws’ to mean “the bye-laws made under Section 186 of the Cantonments Act, 1924 (2 of 1924) or the bye-laws made under Section 349-A of the Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957 (66

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial