Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: cantonments act 1924 section 69 · Page 1 of about 29 results (0.032 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jul 28 1980

Har Gopal Jaiswal and anr. Vs. the Cantonment Board, Kanpur and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jul-28-1980

Subject : Municipal Tax

Acts : Cantonments Act, 1924 - Sections 69, 71 71(1) and 88

Reported in : AIR1981All29

without depositing the disputed amount of tax. The petitioners also moved an application under Section 71 of the Cantonments Act, 1924 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) claiming amendment of the assessment list prepared by the Board, whereunder they … authorise the Board to make any amendment in an assessment list, authenticated and published under Sub-section (2) of Section 69. He went on to contend that in any case after the petitioner's appeal was dismissed by the Additional

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 03 1962

The Cantonment Board, Ambala Cantt Vs. Dipak Parkash and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-03-1962

Subject : Municipal Tax

Acts : Cantonments (House Accommodation) Act, 1923; Cantonments (Amendment) Act, 1924 - Sections 5, 6, 7, 11, 69, 84(2), 84(21), 99(2) and 99(2)(6)

Reported in : AIR1963SC963; [1963]1SCR196

the authentication of the Assessment list in the present case is valid as required by the provisions of Section 69, Cantonments Act, 1924'. 3. The appellate officer who is required by section 84(2) to state his own opinion … reasonable doubt and accordingly made a reference to the High Court of Punjab under section 84(21) of the Cantonments Act, 1924, for the decision of these questions. 2. Admittedly half of this Bungalow had been appropriated under the provision

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 22 2004

Ramesh Chandra (Sri) and anr. Vs. Ist Additional District Judge and or ...

Court : Uttaranchal

Decided on : Dec-22-2004

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Cantonment (Extension of Rent Control Laws) Act, 1957 - Sections 3 and 3(4); Cantonments (House Accommodation) Act, 1923 - Sections 3(1); Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 - Sections 1, 1(3), 2, 2(1), 3, 11, 12(3), 13(3), 14, 20(4), 21 and 21(1); Cantonment Act, 1924 - Sections 2, 2(1), 2(3), 3, 60 and 69; United Provinces Town Area Act - Sections 7; Uttar Pradesh Cantonment (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1952; United provinces Town Areas Act, 1914; Under the Public Health Act, 1875; Compulsory Purchase Act, 1965; Madras Buildings (lease and Rent Control) Act, 1960 - Sections 14 (1); Uttar Pradesh Urban Building (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Rules, 1972 - Rule 16 and 16(2); Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 22

Reported in : 2005(1)ARC812

be inserted, namely(e) every cantonment in Uttar Pradesh declared to be a Cantonment under Section 3 of the Cantonments Act, 1924 (2 of 1924),(ii) for sub-section (4), the following sub section shall be substituted, namely:- '(4) It shall come … be substituted;(3) in section 3,(i) in Clause (b), at the end, the words 'or the tax mentioned in Section 69 of the Cantonment, Act, 1924: shall be added;(ii) in Clause (h) at the end, the following words shall

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Feb 22 2005

S.C. Bhattacharji Vs. Meerut Cantonment Board

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Feb-22-2005

Subject : Municipal TaxLimitation

Acts : Cantonment Act, 1924 - Sections 15, 16, 22(1), 25, 60(2), 68, 69, 71, 84, 98, 99 and 99(2); ;Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 5

Reported in : 2005(3)AWC2613; 2005(2)ESC1029

of the case. In my opinion, order of the appellate authority is wholly erroneous.9. Section 99(2)(b) of the Cantonments Act, 1924 reads as follows :'99. Exemption in the case of buildings.--(1) When, in pursuance of Section 98, Board has … therefore, the benefit of such decision cannot be given to the petitioner. Appellate authority further held that under Section 69 of the Act, Board has authenticated the assessment list, therefore, appeal should have been filed within 30 days

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 17 1997

Pune Cantonment Board and Another Vs. Bharat Forge Co. Ltd.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jun-17-1997

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Cantonments Act, 1924 - Sections 60, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71 and 72; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Companies Act, 1956; Bombay Municipal Boroughs Act, 1925 - Sections 78, 82(3), 83(3) and 123(1)

Reported in : AIR1998Bom53; 1998(1)BomCR692; (1998)1BOMLR812; 1998(2)MhLj445

hereby quashed and set aside. Rule is made absolute accordingly. No order as to costs.18. Petition succeed. Cantonment Act (1924), Section 71 - Expression 'At Any Time'- Power to amend assessment list - Power to recover tax for years … persons and it shall not be necessary to appoint to the Assessment Committee any member of the Board. Section 69 then provides that when all objections made under section 68 have been disposed of and revision of the … Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India by the Pune Cantonment Board and its Executive Officer is directed against the judgment and order

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 31 2011

Airports Authority of India Vs. Delhi Cantonment Board

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-31-2011

Subject : Municipalities

Acts : Cantonments Act, 1924 - Sections 68(1), 103, 69, 71, 64(a)(b), 84; Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957 - Section 126; Constitution of India - Article 226

February 2003 raised by the DCB calling upon AAI to pay Rs. 20,12,06,539/- as house tax under the Cantonments Act, 1924 (CA, 1924) for the period 1st April 1998 to 31st May 2002. 2. On 26th May 2003, this … mentioned earlier in para 2 of the assessment order and that "the above mentioned assessment is authenticated" under Section 69 of the CA, 1924. 8. Mr. B.B. Jain, learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner, submitted that if one

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 06 1999

Smt. Sunita Rani Vs. Xviiith Additional District Judge and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Sep-06-1999

Subject : Municipal Tax

Acts : Cantonment Act, 1924 - Sections 65, 65(1), 65(3), 68 and 68(1)

Reported in : AIR2000All25

the learned counsel for the petitioner is that in view of the provisions of Section 68(1) of the Cantonments Act, 1924 (hereinafter called as the Act) before revision of the assessment a notice in writing of the revision was … That since no objections were filed by Sri Abdul Rehman the final assessment of the house tax under Section 69 in respect of the property in dispute was assessed at the rate of Rs. 13,800/- p.a. i.e. on

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 14 1969

K.K. Kuruvilla Vs. Executive Officer, Parathode Panchayat

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Nov-14-1969

Subject : Other TaxesConstitution

Acts : Kerala Panchayats Act, 1960 - Sections 69, 69(1), (4) and (5); Constitution of India - Article 276(2)

Reported in : AIR1971Ker54

Municipal Act 17 of 1113, or any tax of the nature of a profession tax imposed under the Cantonments Act, 1924, for the same half year to any Panchayat or Municipal Council or cantonment authority in the State of … Act, for short) says (among other things) that every Panchayat shall levy in its area a profession tax. Section 69 lays down how this tax is to be levied:'69. Profession tax.-- (1) The profession tax shall, subject to

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 21 1978

M. Gopal Pondither Vs. the District Magistrate-cum-collector of Chingl ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-21-1978

Subject : Municipal Tax

Acts : Cantonments Act, 1924 - Sections 84 and 87

Reported in : AIR1978Mad413

had already submitted his objections.3. Thereafter, the petitioner preferred an appeal on 19-8-1968 under Section 84 of the Cantonments Act 1924 to the first respondent who is the prescribed appellate authority under the Act. By a communication dated 3-2-1970, … appeal is brought within thirty days next after the date of the authentication of the assessment list under Section 69 and the amount of tax in dispute in the appeal has been deposited by the appellant in the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 12 1978

P.S. Gill and ors. Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Oct-12-1978

Subject : Property

Acts : Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 4; Delhi Development Act, 1957; Indian Works of defense Act, 1903; Cantonment Act, 1924; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 16(1979)DLT266; ILR1979Delhi601; 1979RLR497

been included within the limits of the Cantt. by a notification dated 2-5-1942 under Section 4(3) of the Cantonments Act. 1924 (hereinafter referred to as 'the 1924 Act'). On 4th December. 1962, notifications were issued by the Government of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial