Advanced Search Results

The Cantonment Board, Ambala Cantt Vs. Dipak Parkash and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Municipal Tax

Acts : Cantonments (House Accommodation) Act, 1923; Cantonments (Amendment) Act, 1924 - Sections 5, 6, 7, 11, 69, 84(2), 84(21), 99(2) and 99(2)(6)

Reported in : AIR1963SC963; [1963]1SCR196

reasonable doubt and accordingly made a reference to the High Court of Punjab under section 84(21) of the Cantonments Act, 1924, for the decision of these questions. 2. Admittedly half of this Bungalow had been appropriated under the provision … the scheme of appropriation of house under the Cantonments (House Accommodation) Act, No. VI of 1923. 7. Under section 5 every house situate in a Cantonment is liable to appropriation by the Central Government on a lease in

Agricultural Produce Market Committee, Narela, Delhi Vs. Commissioner ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2(1), 10, 10(20), 10(26AAB) and 260A; Finance Act, 2002; Cantonments Act, 1924 - Sections 3; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 3(31); Delhi Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation) Act, 1998 - Sections 5, 22(1), 22(2), 62 65, 88, 88(1), 88(2) and 88(3); Delhi Development Act, 1957; Payment of Bonus Act, 1965 - Sections 32; Constitution of India (Seventy-third Amendment) Act, 1992; Constitution of India (Seventy-fourth Amendment) Act, 1992; Constitution of India - Articles 243, 243P, 243 and 243ZF

Reported in : (2008)218CTR(SC)433; [2008]305ITR1(SC); JT2008(10)SC17; 2008(11)SCALE540; (2008)9SCC434; 2008AIRSCW6285; 2008(6)Supreme520; 2008(11)SCALE540

management of a Municipal or local fund; or (iv) Cantonment Board as defined in Section 3 of the Cantonments Act, 1924 (2 of 1924);12. Mr. M.L. Verma, learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of the appellants, submitted that AMC(s) … next contended that in the hierarchy, mentioned in 1998 Act, the Delhi Agricultural Marketing Board, as defined under Section 5, is in complete control of the finances of AMC(s) and, therefore, according to learned Counsel, the clarification, issued

Shanmugadurai Vs. State of Tamil Nadu Rep. by Its Secretary and Commis ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Property

Acts : Constitution of India -- Article 14; Land Acquisition Act, 1894 -- Sections 4(1); Tamil Nadu Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1978 -- Sections 5-A and 6; Town and Country planning Act, 1971 -- Sections 17, 26, 27, 28 and 36 -- Rule 3; Tamil Nadu Housing Board Act -- Sections 70; Cantonment Act, 1924 -- Sections 12(3)

Reported in : 1999(2)CTC522

the purpose for which land is needed vis-a-vis the provisions of the Cantonment Act, 1924. It is true that when acquisition of the land was … are required to necessarily specify the purpose for which land is needed vis-a-vis the provisions of the Cantonment Act, 1924. It is true that when acquisition of the land was within the limits specified under Section 4 and … Government Gazette dated 26.6.91 and appointed the 2nd respondent herein to perform the functions of the Collector under Section 5-A of the Act . The second respondent issued a notice dated 21.8.1991 in Form 3-A for an enquiry

Ajay Krishan Shinghal, Etc. Etc. Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Property

Acts : Cantonment Act, 1924 - Sections 5; Delhi Development Act, 1958 - Sections 12(3); Land Acquisition Act 1894 - Sections 3, 4 and 6;

Reported in : 1996VIAD(SC)644; AIR1996SC2677; 1997(1)CTC156; JT1996(7)SC301; 1996(6)SCALE29; (1996)10SCC721; [1996]Supp4SCR319; 1996(2)LC636(SC)

true that when acquisition of the land was within the limits specified under Section 4 and declaration under Section 5 of the Cantonment Act 1924 was published, the Cantonment Board and the authorities constituted thereunder get the power … counsel for the appellants, it that the Lands situated within the Delhi Cantonment are governed by the provisions of the Cantonment Act, 1924. The land … appellants, it that the Lands situated within the Delhi Cantonment are governed by the provisions of the Cantonment Act, 1924. The land in its jurisdiction is required to be developed as per the provisions contained in that act

Smt. Haannurammabai Kalal (Deceased) by L.R. Vs. Cantonment Board

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Civil

Acts : Cantonments Act, 1924 - Sections 185, 185(1), 256, 268, 273, 273(1) and 273(4); Limitation Act; Tamil Nadu Estates (Abolition and Conversion into Ryotwari) Act, 1948 - Sections 64C; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 80

Reported in : 2008(3)KarLJ528; 2008(1)AIRKarR178; 2008AIHC1220(Kar); 2008AIHC1220(Kar)

was projected, non-issuance of notice by appellant as required under Section 273(1) is not a serious infirmity. -- CANTONMENTS ACT, 1924. Section 254: Demolition of any erection Held, Notice prior to the action is mandatory, if not the action is … the effect that the appellant claiming to be the owner in possession of suit property bearing House No. 57, situated at High Street, Camp-Belgaum, and having her name entered in the GLR extract in respect of the

Cantonment Board and Another Vs. Church of North India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Property

Acts : Cantonment Act 1924; Public Premises Act - Sections 4, 5, 9, 2(g), 2(e), (2)(viii); Transfer of Property Act - Section 106

the provisions of the Transfer of Property Act 1882 applied to the Cantonments Boards. The particular lease deed was not a registered lease deed as … and it is under the management of the Nasirabad Cantonment which is a cantonment governed under the Cantonment Act, 1924. The case of the appellants is that the respondent was given the concerned premises under a lease deed … The Estate Officer considered the objections filed by the respondent and then passed an order of eviction under Section 5 of that Act on 26.6.1991. The order passed by the Estate Officer in para 7 thereof, notes that

Mrs. Pramila Nesargi Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Cantonment Act, 1924 - Sections 3; ;Cantonment Land (Administration) Rules, 1937 - Rules 5(1), 14(3) and 14(5); Air Force Act, 1950 - Sections 45, 52 and 57

Reported in : ILR1997KAR1810

Defence grounds in question has been given to the respondent company as per the provisions contained in the Cantonment Act, 1924 read, with Rules framed under Section 280 thereof, namely, Cantonment Land (Administration) Rules, 1937.16. Mr. Jayaram, … grounds in question has been given to the respondent company as per the provisions contained in the Cantonment Act, 1924 read, with Rules framed under Section 280 thereof, namely, Cantonment Land (Administration) Rules, 1937.16. Mr. Jayaram, learned Senior … is to the following effect:HO Training CommandIndian Air ForceJC Nagar PostBangalore - 560 006TC/612/AOC-in-C 07 Nov 96Shri R. Roshan BaigHonourable Minister of Statefor Home and

Smt. Sunita Rani Vs. Xviiith Additional District Judge and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Municipal Tax

Acts : Cantonment Act, 1924 - Sections 65, 65(1), 65(3), 68 and 68(1)

Reported in : AIR2000All25

the learned counsel for the petitioner is that in view of the provisions of Section 68(1) of the Cantonments Act, 1924 (hereinafter called as the Act) before revision of the assessment a notice in writing of the revision was … the Assessment Register and got the appeal filed under Section 68(4) of the Cantonment Act. An application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, was also filed. The aforesaid grounds were specifically taken up in the memo of

S.C. Bhattacharji Vs. Meerut Cantonment Board

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Municipal TaxLimitation

Acts : Cantonment Act, 1924 - Sections 15, 16, 22(1), 25, 60(2), 68, 69, 71, 84, 98, 99 and 99(2); ;Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 5

Reported in : 2005(3)AWC2613; 2005(2)ESC1029

of the case. In my opinion, order of the appellate authority is wholly erroneous.9. Section 99(2)(b) of the Cantonments Act, 1924 reads as follows :'99. Exemption in the case of buildings.--(1) When, in pursuance of Section 98, Board has … revised assessed annual rental value. On 22nd May, 2003, the petitioner filed appeal along with an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act. On 17th October, 2003, learned Additional District Judge, Court No. 10 rejected the application

Dr. S. Vijaya Rama Rao and anr. Vs. Secunderabad Cantonment Board

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Property

Acts : Cantonments Act 1924 - Sections 179, 180, 181, 181(1), 181(2), 181(3), 181(4), 181(5), 181(6), 185(1) and 256

Reported in : 2006(3)ALD260

Society Limited (for short, the Society). The petitioners made an application on 18.7.1992 Under Section 179 of the Cantonments Act 1924 (for short, the Act) informing the respondents their intention to construct residential houses and submitted plans with the … of Section 181(6) of the Act come into play. Reliance is placed on the decisions of Ram Narain v. Cantonment Board, Delhi 0044/1973 : AIR1973Delhi84 and T. Parathasarathy v. Madhu Sangal 1992 Crl.LJ 26.5. The point on