Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: cantonments act 1924 section 46 · Page 1 of about 63 results (0.033 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jul 25 1990

Estate Officer, Cantonment Board Vs. Rup Ram S/O Mohan Lal and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-25-1990

Subject : Civil

Acts : Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971 - Sections 2 and 7; Cantonments Act, 1924 - Sections 3, 11, 45, 46, 51A, 53, 54, 63A, 99A and 108 to 111; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 3(31); Hyderabad Rent Control Act - Sections 31; Major Port Trust Act; Cantonments (Extension of Rent Control Laws) Act, 1957

Reported in : 1991(1)BomCR363

Board, situated withing the limits of Aurangabad Cantonment, which is a defined cantonment under section 3 of the Cantonments Act, 1924. Respondent No.1-Rup Ram is an officer in the Defence Services, Government of India, and has been in occupation … under various provisions of the Cantonments Act, the Central Government does exercise control over the Board. (See sections 46, 51-A, 53, 54, 63-A, 99-A, 108, 109 and 111). In my opinion however, although the Central Government exercises

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 28 2005

J. Pratap Reddy Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Nov-28-2005

Subject : Civil

Acts : Cantonments Act, 1924 - Sections 10, 13, 13(3), 14, 14(1), 14(2), 14(4) and 14(5); Merchant Shipping Act, 1854 - Sections 374; Uttar Pradesh Muslims Waqfs Act, 1936 - Sections 5(2); Kerala Agriculturists Debt Relief Act, 1970 - Sections 4(1); Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 46(7); Railway Servants (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1968 - Rule 14(1)

Reported in : 127(2006)DLT526; 2006(86)DRJ251

retrospectively extending the term of the Cantonment Board, Secunderabad under the first proviso to Section 14(4) of the Cantonments Act, 1924 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') after the expiry of the period for which the board was constituted. … Board of Revenue, West Bengal, : [1970]78ITR74(SC) , the words 'be reckoned' had been inadvertently omitted in section 46(7)(iv) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, and were hence supplied by construction otherwise the provision would have become

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 10 1994

Jayantilal Bachubhai Vadiwala and Etc. Vs. the Competent Authority and ...

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Feb-10-1994

Subject : Property

Acts : Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 - Sections 2, 3, 4, 6(1), 8, 11, 12, 12(1), 12(4), 12(5), 30, 30(1), 30(4), 33, 33(1), 46 and 46(2); Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Rule, 1976 - Rule 15A; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 227; Wealth Tax Act, 1957; Cantonment Act, 1924; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 41, Rule 27

Reported in : AIR1995Guj25; (1995)1GLR831

of the Second Schedule except in relation to lands or buildings in cantonment declared as such under the Cantonment Act, 1924. Part I of the … the Second Schedule except in relation to lands or buildings in cantonment declared as such under the Cantonment Act, 1924. Part I of the Second Schedule refers to the appellate authority with respect to each State. The State … by Rules made under the Act. The power to make Rules is conferred on the Central Government under Section 46 thereof. Clause (o) of Sub-section (2) thereof empowers the Central Government to frame Rules inter alia with respect

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Dec 17 1980

Vora Saiyedbhai Kadarbhai (a Partnership Firm) Vs. Saiyed Intajam Huss ...

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Dec-17-1980

Subject : Constitution

Reported in : (1981)22GLR596

or deemed to be constituted, under the Gujarat Municipalities Act, 1963;(iii) a contonment declared as such under the Cantonments Act, 1924.Definition of 'rural artisan' clearly discloses that he has hardly anything to do with agriculture. He is a person … Inasmuch as the President did not do so, the impugned Act was not a valid piece of legislation.(3) Section 14 of the impugned Act is violative of Articles 19(1)(f), 19(1)(g) and 31 of the Constitution and is … Rajiv Ramanlal and Ors. v. Ashok Mill Ltd. 1979 (2)-XX (2) G.L.R. 464; it has been held that the constitutional validity of an impugned provision

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 22 2004

Ramesh Chandra (Sri) and anr. Vs. Ist Additional District Judge and or ...

Court : Uttaranchal

Decided on : Dec-22-2004

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Cantonment (Extension of Rent Control Laws) Act, 1957 - Sections 3 and 3(4); Cantonments (House Accommodation) Act, 1923 - Sections 3(1); Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 - Sections 1, 1(3), 2, 2(1), 3, 11, 12(3), 13(3), 14, 20(4), 21 and 21(1); Cantonment Act, 1924 - Sections 2, 2(1), 2(3), 3, 60 and 69; United Provinces Town Area Act - Sections 7; Uttar Pradesh Cantonment (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1952; United provinces Town Areas Act, 1914; Under the Public Health Act, 1875; Compulsory Purchase Act, 1965; Madras Buildings (lease and Rent Control) Act, 1960 - Sections 14 (1); Uttar Pradesh Urban Building (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Rules, 1972 - Rule 16 and 16(2); Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 22

Reported in : 2005(1)ARC812

be inserted, namely(e) every cantonment in Uttar Pradesh declared to be a Cantonment under Section 3 of the Cantonments Act, 1924 (2 of 1924),(ii) for sub-section (4), the following sub section shall be substituted, namely:- '(4) It shall come … been mentioned earlier that, on 17.2.1982, the Central Government issue a further notification under Section 3 of Act 46 of 1957 in suppression of its earlier notification dated 1st September, 1973. By this notification the Central Government

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 11 1966

Rama Sundari Devi Vs. Indu Bhusan Bose

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jul-11-1966

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India; ;Government of India Act, 1935; ;The West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1956; ;Cantonments (Extension of Rent Control Laws) Act, 1957

Reported in : AIR1967Cal355

or allocation of property by the State Government. I have already set out above certain provisions in the Cantonments Act, 1924 which shows that even private houses in cantonment areas were intended to come within the scope of operation … called the Cantonments (Extension of Rent Control Laws) Act, 1957 being Act 46 of 1957. The Statement of the Objects & Reasons Of this Act … Sinha, C.J.1. This is a reference by the Munsif, third court, Sealdah under Section 113 of the Code of Civil Procedure and Article 228 of the Constitution. The facts in this case

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 11 2000

Union of India and Another Vs. Mohammed MohiuddIn and Others

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Aug-11-2000

Subject : Property

Acts : Cantonments Act, 1924 - Sections 3(1 and 2), 108, 178, 181, 274, 280, 282 and 283; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 226, 295(2) and 300-A; Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 - Sections 6(1) and 15(2); Cantonment Land Administration (Amendment) Rules, 1937; Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants Act, 1971; Hyderabad Land Revenue Act, 1337 Fasli; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 65 and 90; Municipalities Act - Sections 330; Cantonment Land Administration Rules, 1925 - Rules 1(A), 2, 3 and 6; Secunderabad and Aurangabad Cantonment Land Administration Rules, 1930; Andhra Pradesh (Telangana Area) Land Revenue Act, 1317-F; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1973 - Sections 11; Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Act - Sections 428, 433 and 450

Reported in : 2000(6)ALD376; 2000(6)ALT551

Estate Officer as per the Cantonment Land Administration Rules 1937 which were framed under Section 280 of the Cantonments Act, 1924, hereinafter referred to as the 1924 Act. Thus contending they sought the writ petition be dismissed.19. In view

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 10 1995

Municipal Corporation for City of Pune and Another Vs. Bharat Forge Co ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-10-1995

Subject : Other Taxes

Acts : Cantonments Act, 1880 - Sections 21, 22; Cantonments Act, 1924 - Sections 45(1), 60 to 63 and 81(2) and 255; General Clauses Act - Sections 21; Constitution of India - Articles 21, 226 and 265; Bombay Municipal Act, 1872; Bombay District Municipal Act, 1873; Cantonments Act, 1910; Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporations Act, 1949 - Sections 32(4); Limitation Act, 1623; Sex Disqualification Act, 1919; Statute Law (Repeals) Act, 1906; Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 - Sections 8(2); Cantonment (Extention of Rent Control Laws) Act, 1957 - Sections 3

Reported in : AIR1996SC2856; JT1995(3)SC312; 1995(2)SCALE245; (1995)3SCC434a; [1995]2SCR716; (1995)2UPLBEC740; (1995) 3 SCC 434

Notification relating to assessment, collection and recovery of octroi duties.8. After the aforesaid Notifications had been issued, the Cantonments Act, 1924 was enacted. Chapter V of this Act is on the subject of 'Taxation'; and Sections 60 to 63 … started levy and recovery of octroi form 1875-76. The Cantonments Act, 1880 was enacted on 5th February, 1980. Section 21 of this Act permitted imposition by the Local Government, with the previous sanction of the Governor-General in

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 24 1994

Raj Kumar Shukla Vs. Xth Additional District Judge, Lucknow and Others

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Mar-24-1994

Subject : Election

Acts : Cantonment Act, 1924 - Sections 31; Contonment Electoral Rules, 1945 - Rules 19, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46 and 47; Representation of Peoples Act - Sections 77, 79, 82(1) and 82

Reported in : AIR1995All403

to be in order. Sri Virendra Kumar Shukla later on withdrew his candidature under Rule 21 of the Cantonments Electoral Rules, 1945. After polling the petitioner was declared elected for the membership of Ward No. 4 of … will be no order as to costs.20. Petition dismissed. Election - election petition - Section 31 of Cantonment Act, 1924 - person withdraws nomination before date of election - is not a necessary party to election petition - … as may be petitioners hold such enquiry as he deems necessary.'5. Rule 46 of the above Rules deals with the powers of enquiry officer in

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 13 1957

M.P.K.B. Karuppan Chettiar Vs. Pl.M.C.T.K. Krishnappa Chettiar

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Dec-13-1957

Subject : Civil

Reported in : (1958)1MLJ235

other than agricultural lands, under the Madras District Municipalities Act, 1920, the Madras City Municipal Act, 1919, the Cantonments Act, 1924 or any law governing Municipal or Local bodies in any other State in India or under the Madras … by the Panchayats. The other relevant provisions of the regulation were Sections 46, 48 and 49 which ran:47. To enable the panchayat to carry out … Pudukottai, which was the successor of 'the Court which passed the decree ' for its scaling down under Section 19 of the Act. This was O.P. No. 4 of 1953, and it is the correctness of the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial