Advanced Search Results

The Cantonment Board, Ambala Vs. Pyarelal

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Cantonments Act, 1924 - Sections 259 and 259(2); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 435 and 439; Constitution of India - Article 227; Cantonments (Amendment) Act, 1954; Cantonment Property Rules, 1925 - Rule 8; Cantonment Land Administration Rules 1937 - Rules 4, 8, 9(6), 26, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 34, 37, 41 and 42

Reported in : AIR1966SC108; 1966CriLJ93; [1965]3SCR341

the majority the appeal is dismissed. Tenancy - realization of rent - Sections 259 and 259 (2) of Cantonments Act, 1924, Sections 435 and 439 of Code of Criminal Procedure, Article 227 of Constitution of India, Cantonments (Amendment) Act, … of agricultural leases; r. 37 for leases for miscellaneous purposes and r. 41 for special conditions in leases. It may be mentioned that originally there … acting under s. 259 of the Act acts as a persona designata and therefore his order under that section is not revisable under ss. 435/439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and the Sessions Judge and the

Shiv Kumar Jatia Vs. S.R.G.P. Industries Ltd., Through Its Managing Di ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Specific Relief Act - Sections 6C, 40, 41 and 54; Cantonment Act, 1924; Transfer of Property Act - Sections 108 and 108(J); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2

Reported in : AIR2005All215; 2005(1)ARC431; 2005(2)AWC1457

as long as the development is in consonance with the building plans sanctioned in accordance with the Cantonment Act 1924. The answering respondent can construct as per the rights available to him under the Deeds, The deed specifically … plaintiff came to know that the defendant has obtained the sanction from Cantonment Board Kanpur, vide its resolution No. 26, dated 12.9.2000. This sanction was … such injury as could not be compensated by award or damages, discretionary relief of injunction is barred by Section 41(e) and 41(h) of Specific Relief Act. The balance of convenience is not in favour of the plaintiff who

United India Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corp ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Bombay Government Premises (Eviction) Act, 1955; Bombay Municipal Corporation Act; Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947; Cantonments Act, 1924; Companies (Amendment) Act, 2000; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 3 and 25; Institutes of Technology Act, 1961; Kerala Construction Works Welfare Funds Act, 1989; Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Act, 1976; Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 - Sections 3(1); Major Port Trusts Act, 1963; Presidency Small Causes Court Act, 1882 - Sections 41, 41(1) and 41(2); Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971 - Sections 2 and 15; Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) (Amendment) Act, 1980; Punjab Reorganisation Act, 1966 - Sections 79 and 80(6); Constitution of India - Article 12

Reported in : 2007(6)ALLMR843; 2007(5)BomCR316; 2007(5)MhLj313

the National Capital Territory of Delhi or in any other Union Territory,(viii) any Cantonment Board constituted under the Cantonments Act, 1924 (2 of 1924); and(3) in relation to the National Capital Territory of Delhi(i) any premises belonging to the … the respondent had no right to continue in occupation of the suit premises. It further pleaded that under Section 41 of the Presidency Small Causes Court Act, 1882 the Small Causes Court had the jurisdiction to entertain and

Cantonment Board and ors. Vs. Jagat Paul Singh Cheema

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Subject : Service

Reported in : 2007(3)JKJ60

was erroneous as this view of the learned Single Judge was not countenanced by the provisions of the Cantonments Act, 1924. He refers to Section 52(2) of the Act to support his submission. According to the learned Counsel, the … to be decided by the majority of the Members of the Board present and voting. In terms of Section 41, the decision of the majority was, therefore, to be the decision of the Cantonment Board. This majority decision

Union of India Vs. Ibrahim UddIn and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure(CPC) 1908 - Order 41 Rule 27, Order 7 Rule 17, Section 100; Indian Evidence Act, 1872 - Section 114(g), 58, 17 to 31, 68, 65, 74, 90; Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Section 34 ; Cantonment Act, 1924 - Section 43A

outside the notified area and to establish that such area was declared under Section 43A of the Cantonment Act, 1924. In the circumstances, I do not find that it is a case where this court in exercise of … B.S. CHAUHAN; DIPAK MISRA, JJ.] Code of Civil Procedure(CPC) 1908 - Order 41 Rule 27, Order 7 Rule 17, Section 100 -- The said application … on the Will, which was liable to be ignored altogether and making reference to the record of the Cantonment Board. In case, the Union of India did not produce the revenue record before the trial Court, the

Dilip Baruah Vs. State of Assam and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 38, 38(1) and 38(2), 41, 51, 226, 256 and 356;; Disabilities (Equal opportunities, Protection of Rights and Full Participation) Act, 1995 - Sections 2, 32 and 33;; Cantonment Act, 1924

(i) in relation to the Central Govt. or any establishment whollyor substantially financed by the Government, or a Cantonment Board constituted under the Cantonment Act, 1924 the Central Government; (ii) in relation to a State Government or … Govt. or any establishment whollyor substantially financed by the Government, or a Cantonment Board constituted under the Cantonment Act, 1924 the Central Government; (ii) in relation to a State Government or any establishment wholly or substantially financed by … the force of municipal law without appropriate legislation.'. Articles 38 and n 41 of the Constitution of India are as follows:- '38(1) The State shall … hand.10. The appropriate Govt. mentioned in this Act is also defined under section 2(a), which are as follows: -'2(a) appropriate Govt. means:- (i) in relation

Dilip Baruah Vs. State of Assam and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 38, 38(1) and 38(2), 41, 51, 226, 256 and 356; Disabilities (Equal opportunities, Protection of Rights and Full Participation) Act, 1995 - Sections 2, 32 and 33; Cantonment Act, 1924

(i) in relation to the Central Govt. or any establishment whollyor substantially financed by the Government, or a Cantonment Board constituted under the Cantonment Act, 1924 the Central Government; (ii) in relation to a State Government or … Govt. or any establishment whollyor substantially financed by the Government, or a Cantonment Board constituted under the Cantonment Act, 1924 the Central Government; (ii) in relation to a State Government or any establishment wholly or substantially financed by … the force of municipal law without appropriate legislation.'. Articles 38 and n 41 of the Constitution of India are as follows:- '38(1) The State shall … 10. The appropriate Govt. mentioned in this Act is also defined under section 2(a), which are as follows: - '2(a) appropriate Govt. means:- (i) in

B. Lakshman and anr. Vs. the Union of India (Uoi), Ministry of Defence ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : CivilElection

Acts : Cantonments Act, 1924 - Sections 16(1), 17 and 54; Cantonment Act, 2006 - Sections 1(3), 2, 10, 10(2), 12, 13, 13(1), 13(3), 13(4), 14, 28, 29, 30, 32, 34, 60, 360, 360(1) and 360(2); A.P. Municipalities Act, 1965 - Sections 62, 62(1) and 62(4); Constitution of India - Articles 14, 21, 243B, 243P, 243Q and 243S

Reported in : 2008(2)ALD429; 2008(1)ALT443

elected vide notification dated 19.05.2006, which was notified by the Government of India under Section 16(1) of the Cantonments Act, 1924, the Cantonments Act 2006 (41 of 2006) has come into force w.e.f. 18.12.2006. By virtue of the said

Jayantilal Bachubhai Vadiwala and Etc. Vs. the Competent Authority and ...

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Property

Acts : Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 - Sections 2, 3, 4, 6(1), 8, 11, 12, 12(1), 12(4), 12(5), 30, 30(1), 30(4), 33, 33(1), 46 and 46(2); Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Rule, 1976 - Rule 15A; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 227; Wealth Tax Act, 1957; Cantonment Act, 1924; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 41, Rule 27

Reported in : AIR1995Guj25; (1995)1GLR831

be as specified in column '4' of the Second Schedule except in relation to lands or buildings in cantonment declared as such under the Cantonment Act, 1924. Part I of the Second Schedule refers to the appellate … the Second Schedule except in relation to lands or buildings in cantonment declared as such under the Cantonment Act, 1924. Part I of the Second Schedule refers to the appellate authority with respect to each State. The State … under Section 33 of the Act. It cannot be gainsaid that Order 41, Rule 27 of the Code provides for production of additional evidence at … that each petitioner filed his respective statement in the prescribed form under Section 6(1) of the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 (the Act

Fancy Rehabilitation Trust, a Trust Registered Under Provisions of Bom ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Bombay Public Trusts Act; Persons With Disabilities (Equal Opportunities and Equal Participation) Act, 1995 - Sections 2, 25, 26, 32, 33 and 41; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 617; Cantonment Act, 1924; Registration Act; Stamp Act; Bombay Cooperative Societies Act, 1925; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 21; Societies Registration Act; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 20; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 21; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 197; Constitution of India - Articles 12, 14, 42 and 141

Reported in : (2007)ILLJ1073Bom

or any establishment wholly or substantially financed by that Government, or a Cantonment Board constituted under the Cantonment Act, 1924 the Central Government;(ii) in relation … or any establishment wholly or substantially financed by that Government, or a Cantonment Board constituted under the Cantonment Act, 1924 the Central Government;(ii) in relation to a State Government or any establishment wholly or substantially financed by that … may be specified in such notification, exempt any establishment from the provisions of this section.Another relevant section is Section 41, which reads as under:41. Incentives to employers to ensure five per cent of the work force is composed