Advanced Search Results

Union of India and Another Vs. Mohammed MohiuddIn and Others

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Property

Acts : Cantonments Act, 1924 - Sections 3(1 and 2), 108, 178, 181, 274, 280, 282 and 283; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 226, 295(2) and 300-A; Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 - Sections 6(1) and 15(2); Cantonment Land Administration (Amendment) Rules, 1937; Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants Act, 1971; Hyderabad Land Revenue Act, 1337 Fasli; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 65 and 90; Municipalities Act - Sections 330; Cantonment Land Administration Rules, 1925 - Rules 1(A), 2, 3 and 6; Secunderabad and Aurangabad Cantonment Land Administration Rules, 1930; Andhra Pradesh (Telangana Area) Land Revenue Act, 1317-F; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1973 - Sections 11; Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Act - Sections 428, 433 and 450

Reported in : 2000(6)ALD376; 2000(6)ALT551

Estate Officer as per the Cantonment Land Administration Rules 1937 which were framed under Section 280 of the Cantonments Act, 1924, hereinafter referred to as the 1924 Act. Thus contending they sought the writ petition be dismissed.19. In view … of Survey and Boundaries Act are not the conclusive proof of title so as to bind the parties. 288 of 1992 rejected the claim for grant of temporary injunction as Syed Ali Khan failed to establish a

Secunderabad Cantonment Board, Andhra Circle, Secunderabad Rep. by Exe ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Civil

Acts : Cantonment Act, 1924 - Sections 181, 181(3), 181(4) and 280; ;Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976; ;Record of the Rights Regulation Act - Sections 15(2); ;Land Revenue Act - Sections 158; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 11 and 79 - Order 27, Rule 3; ;Administrative Law; Constitution of India - Article 226; Cantonment Land Administration Rules, 1934 - Rules 3 and 10

Reported in : 2004(3)ALT27(SC); JT2003(9)SC316; 2003(10)SCALE33; (2003)12SCC315; (2004)1UPLBEC882

Cantonment Land Administration Rules, 1937 have been trained by virtue of power vested under Section 280 of the Cantonments Act, 1924. Rule 10 in Chapter III of the Cantonment Land Administration Rules deals with maintenance of General Land Register. … parties in the appeal which has been decided against them.7. Sadiq Ali Khan filed a Civil Suit No. 288/92 also in the Court of Civil Judge, Secunderabad claiming ownership and possession of land measuring 65 acres in

Market Committee and ors. Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2005)94TTJ(Delhi)692

management of a municipal or local fund; or (iv) Cantonment Board as defined in Section 3 of the Cantonments Act, 1924 (2 of 1924)." The result of above Explanation is that Agricultural Marketing Board, Committee, etc., cannot be treated … for that year have been audited by an accountant as defined in the Explanation below Sub-section (2) of Section 288 and the person in receipt of the income furnishes along with the return of income for the relevant

Sorrells Vs. United States

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : MRTP

been "on his job continuously without missing a pay day since March, 1924." Witness identified the timesheet showing this employment. This witness and three others … States, 10 F. 92, 94, note, p. 97; United States v. Reisenweber, 288 F. 520, 526; Aultman v. United States, 289 F. 251. [ Footnote … a time in Haywood County, North Carolina, where he posed as a tourist, he visited defendant's home near Canton on Sunday, July 13, 1930, accompanied by three residents of the county who knew the defendant well. He … unjust, another construction should be adopted if possible. P. 287 U. S. 446 . 2. The National Prohibition Act, though denouncing generally as criminal the sale of intoxicating liquor for beverage purposes, was Page 287 U. S.

V.G. Row Vs. the State of Madras

Court : Chennai

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1908 - Sections 1 and 15(2); Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1) and 19(4); Madras Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1950

Reported in : AIR1951Mad147; (1951)IMLJ628

an implied power to issue a notfn. As examples I may refer to Sub-clause (19) of Section 2, Cantonments Act, 1924 (II [2] of 1924); Sub-clause (4) of Sub-section (8) of Section 8, Madras ProhibitionAct, 1937 (X [10] of … do away with this difference as pointed out by Maxwell on Interpretation of Statutes (Edn. 9) at p. 288 :'The tendency of modern decisions, upon the whole, is to narrow materially the difference between what is called