Advanced Search Results

New Delhi Municipal Committee Vs. State of Punjab, Etc. Etc.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Municipal TaxConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 54, 133, 142, 239, 240, 241, 242, 243, 244, 245 ot 255, 256 to 263, 285, 289(1), 357, 367 and 372; Punjab Municipal Act, 1911 - Sections 61; Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957; New Delhi Municipal Council Act, 1994 - Sections 60, 62 and 119; Government of India Act, 1935 - Sections 5, 6, 94, 99, 100, 104, 154, 155(1) and 311(1); General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 3(58); Sea Customs Act, 1878 - Sections 20; Central Excises Act, 1944 - Sections 3; Government of India Act, 1919; Government of Part C States Act, 1951 - Sections 21, 22 and 38(22); Reorganisation Act, 1956; Union Territory by the Punjab (Reorganisation) Act, 1966; Government of Union Territories Act, 1963; State of Himachal Pradesh Act, 1970; North-Eastern Areas (Reorganisation) Ac

Reported in : AIR1997SC2847; JT1997(1)SC40; 1996(9)SCALE613; (1997)7SCC339; [1996]Supp10SCR472

on Property, such as, in the case of Entry 3, List I which deals with Cantonments and the Cantonments Act, 1924 which allows Parliament to levy taxes for Contonments. Mr. Sen then contended that such a power would be … under Proclamation issued under Article 356.21. We may now set out ARTICLES 285 AND 289:285. Exemption of property of the Union from State taxation.- (1) … the 1st day of October, 1912. Schedule-A to the Act defined the 'territory' covered by the new Province. Sections 2 and 3 of the 1912 Act provided inter alia that the creation of the new Province of

Adityapur Industrial Area Development Authority Vs. Union of India (Uo ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Finance Act, 2002; Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 10, 10(20), 10(20A), 28, 38 and 38(2); Bihar Industrial Areas Development Authority Act, 1974 - Sections 7 and 17; Cantonments Act, 1924 - Sections 3; General Clauses Act - Sections 3(3); Contract Act; Road Transport Corporation Act, 1950; Maharashtra Industrial Development Act, 1961; Constitution of India - Articles 243, 243P, 285, 289, 289(1), 289(2) and 289(3)

Reported in : AIR2006SC2375; (2006)202CTR(SC)464; [2006]283ITR97(SC); [2006(4)JCR202(SC)]; 2006(5)SCALE321; (2006)5SCC100; 2006(1)LC713(SC)

or management of a Municipal or local fund; or(iv) Cantonment Board as defined in Section 3 of the Cantonments Act, 1924 (2 of 1924).6. It would thus be seen that the income of a local authority chargeable under the … Government thereunder.12. According to Basu's Commentary on the Constitution of India (Sixth Edition, page 50, volume 'L') Articles 285 and 289 are analogous to each other inasmuch as while Article 285 exempts Union property from State taxation,

Adhunik Alloys and Power Ltd. and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and or ...

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Mines and Mineral (Regulation and Development) Act, 1960 - Sections 2, 4, 5, 5(1), 10, 11, 11(5), 13, 17(2), 17(4) and 17A; Mines and Mineral (Regulation and Development) (Amendment) Act, 1987; Mines and Minerals (Regulation and Development) Act, 1957; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 617; Bihar Land Reforms Act, 1950 - Sections 3, 3A, 3A(1), 3B and 4; Cantonment Act, 1910; Statute Law (Repeals) Act, 1906; Cantonments Act 1924 - Sections 60; Madhya Pradesh Motor Vehicles Taxation Act, 1917 - Sections 6(1); Madhya Pradesh Municipalities Act, 1961 - Sections 127; Madhya Pradesh Motor Vehicles Taxation Act, 1947 - Sections 3(2), 6 and 7; Bihar Reorganization Act, 2000; Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963; Mineral Concession Rules, 1960 - Rules 15(1), 21(2), 26(1), 31, 39(1), 40, 58, 58

Reported in : 2007(2)BLJR1185; [2007(2)JCR357(Jhr)]

Cantonment Boards in M.P. issued notifications during the period from 1973 to 1979 under Section 60 of the Cantonments Act 1924 imposing tax on the entry of motor vehicles at specified rates. The High Court quashed the said notifications … Eldon, as a member of House of Lords, had stated thus in Johnstone v. Scott 10 at p. 285: The English lawyer feels himself much at a loss here; he cannot conceive at what period of time

i.C. Chakravarty Vs. Khasi Hills District Council

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 9; Autonomous District (Administration of Justice) Rules, 1953 - Rule 1

him for that purpose. III. The Local Government shall be at liberty to establish civil and military sanitoria, cantonments and posts in any part of the country under your control, and to occupy the lands necessary for … Laws of England, 3rd Edition, Vol. 7, page 285, and held that material on the record was … Draft Constitution, the debates in the Constituent Assembly as well as certain notification by which the Bengal Municipal Act as well as the Assam Municipal Act were extended to the area in question. 5. In the Draft … Council, to the villages of Mawkhar, Laban etc., vide A. R. Municipal 1924-25. The Government divided the Municipality into 10 wards which included Mawkhar. proper … shall not be interfered with.........' On 15-11-1910 a notification was issued under Section 8 of the Bengal Municipal Act. 1884 extending the Act to the

Timken Roller Bearing Co. Vs. Pennsylvania R. Co.

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : MRTP

filed in the Common Pleas Court of Cuyahoga County on May 31, 1924, and was removed to the United States District Court for the Northern … Co. v. Merchants' Elevator Co., 259 U. S. 285 . It went to the merits, and not … in the business of making roller bearings and other steel products, with its principal place of business in Canton, Stark County, Ohio. The Pennsylvania Railroad is a corporation of Pennsylvania, and a common carrier engaged in Ohio, … ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO Syllabus 1. An action against a railroad for the value of switching service performed by a shipper who did so at the … which it is so transferred." There is no doubt that, under this section, if it applies to the present case, the motion to dismiss should