Advanced Search Results

General Officer Commanding-in-chief and anr. Vs. Dr. Subhash Chandra Y ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Acts : Cantonments Act, 1924 - Sections 280(2); Cantonments Act, 1983

Reported in : AIR1988SC876; JT1988(1)SC458; 1988LabIC1014; (1988)IILLJ345SC; 1988(1)SCALE414; (1988)2SCC351; [1988]3SCR62; 1988(3)SLJ91(SC); 1988(1)LC596(SC)

Funds Servants Rules, 1937, hereinafter referred to as 'the Rules', as ultra vires the provisions of the Cantonment Act, 1924 and also quashing the impugned order of transfer dated October 27, 1986 passed by the GOC-in-Chief, Central Command.3. … rules relating to conditions of service.13. Our attention has been drawn to the provision of Sub-section (2) of Section 281 of the Cantonment Act, which provides that all rules made under the Act shall be published in the … judgment of the Allahabad High Court striking down Rule 5-C of the Cantonment Funds Servants Rules, 1937, hereinafter referred to as 'the Rules', as ultra

Motilal Verma and ors. Vs. Narainprasad Sampatram and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Election

Acts : Cantonments Act, 1924 - Sections 280 and 281; Cantonment Electoral Rules, 1945 - Rules 43, 44, 45 and 46; Madhya Pradesh Civil Courts Act, 1958 - Sections 7(2)

Reported in : AIR1967MP243

alone is being decided at this stage.2. The question is whether a petition under Rule 43 of the Cantonments Electoral Rules can be enquired into and disposed of under Rule 45 by an Additional District Judge to … same as that of the words 'District Court' used in certain other enactments, m particular, the Hindu Marriage Act of 1956, which has been the subject-matter of some rulings in this High Court; secondly, whether Rule 45 … on the ground feat it was functioning under fee Civil Courts Act, Section 7(2) of which runs thus:'7(2) An Additional District Judge shall discharge any

Assocn. Of Vasanth Appts. Owners Vs. V. Gopinanth And Ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Cantonment Funds Servants Rules, 1937. It was contended that it was contrary to Section 280(2)(c) of the Cantonment Act, 1924. The argument was accepted. The argument of the appellant, that in view of the provision in the Parent … fulfilled, the rule so framed would be void. The position remains the same even though sub-section (2) of Section 281 of the Act has specifically provided that after the rules are framed and published they shall have effect … another30, this Court was considering the validity of Rule 5C of the Cantonment Funds Servants Rules, 1937. It was contended that it was contrary to

P.S. Gill and ors. Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Property

Acts : Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 4; Delhi Development Act, 1957; Indian Works of defense Act, 1903; Cantonment Act, 1924; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 16(1979)DLT266; ILR1979Delhi601; 1979RLR497

been included within the limits of the Cantt. by a notification dated 2-5-1942 under Section 4(3) of the Cantonments Act. 1924 (hereinafter referred to as 'the 1924 Act'). On 4th December. 1962, notifications were issued by the Government of … of sexual immorality. Chapter Xv and Ch. Xvii make procedural and supplementary provisions. Ch. Xvi (Sections 280 and 281) confer powers (a) on the Central Government to frame rules and (b) on the Board to frame bye-laws,

Farhatullah Vs. Mohammad and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Property

Reported in : AIR1930All89

result is that in my opinion both appeals must fail and they are dismissed accordingly with costs. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … Boys, J.1. This and the connected S.A. No. 1091 of 1924 relate to certain construction in the nature of houses and to the digging of a well on plot … [1917] 4 O.L.J. 454 and Sheo Sahai v. Rajeshwari [1919] 6 O.L.J. 281. The result is that in my opinion both appeals must fail and

Hira Lal Ghosh Vs. Emperor

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : 83Ind.Cas.905

Bux 76 Ind. Cas. 961 : 26 C.W.N. 119 : 38 C.L.J. 281 : (1924) A.I.R. (C)182 : 25 Cr.L.J. 289, where the depositions were … and directs the prisoners be discharged. We also direct the Sessions Judge to call the attention of the Cantonment Magistrate to the provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure which relate to the examination of witnesses and … been disregarded, and the relation of that provision to the general object intended to be secured by the Act; and upon a review of the case in that aspect decide whether the matter is what is called … whether an omission by a Court to comply with the provisions of Section 360, Criminal Procedure Code, vitiates the trial. The provisions of the section