Advanced Search Results

Lt. Col. Narendra Kumar Kakkar (Retd.) Vs. Nissar Khan Ibrahim Khan an ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : CivilConstitution

Acts : Cantonments Act, 1924 - Sections 28(2); Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 1988(4)BomCR475; 1989MhLJ38

of the Board since he had incurred prior to the election a disqualification under section 28(2)(h) of the Cantonments Act, 1924 (hereinafter called 'the said Act'). The alleged disqualification is on the ground that the first respondent had failed

Nisar Ahmad Ibrahim Khan Vs. Deolali Cantonment Board and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Election

Acts : Cantonments Act, 1924 - Sections 28(2)

Reported in : AIR1988SC290; (1988)90BOMLR1; JT1987(4)SC559; 1987(2)SCALE1179; 1987Supp(1)SCC562; 1988(1)LC388(SC)

and contested the election for Membership from Ward No. III of the Deolali Cantonment Board constituted under the Cantonments Act, 1924, ('Act'). Polling took place on 22.12.1985. The results of the election were declared on 23.12.1985. The appellant having … and was under, a disqualification for being chosen as and for being a member of the Board under Section 28(2)(h) of the Act, in as much as appellant had failed to pay arrears of the rent due and

Ramgarh Cantonment Board and anr. Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Other Taxes

Acts : Cantonments Act, 1924 - Sections 60 and 60(1); Bihar and Orissa Municipal Act, 1922 - Sections 3(30), 3(30A), 82, 137, 138, 150, 326 and 356; Madhya Pradesh Municipalities Act, 1961 - Sections 127 and 127(1); Madhya Pradesh Motor Vehicles Taxation Act - Sections 3(2)

Reported in : JT2008(3)SC590; 2008(4)SCALE162; (2008)11SCC223; (2008)15VST550(SC); 2008AIRSCW2223

or authority to levy tax on entry of mechanically propelled vehicles, the Cantonment Board cannot exercise those powers. CANTONMENTS ACT, 1924. Section 60 & Bihar & Orissa Municipal Act (7 of 1922), Sections 82 & 137: [Ashok Bhan &Dalveer Bhandari, … the highest bidder, deposited Rs.3.35 lacs as per the resolution of the Board of the Cantonment Board dated 28.2.2001. In the peculiar facts and circumstances of this case, whatever amount has been deposited by respondent no.3 shall

The Cantonment Board, Ambala Vs. Pyarelal

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Cantonments Act, 1924 - Sections 259 and 259(2); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 435 and 439; Constitution of India - Article 227; Cantonments (Amendment) Act, 1954; Cantonment Property Rules, 1925 - Rule 8; Cantonment Land Administration Rules 1937 - Rules 4, 8, 9(6), 26, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 34, 37, 41 and 42

Reported in : AIR1966SC108; 1966CriLJ93; [1965]3SCR341

the majority the appeal is dismissed. Tenancy - realization of rent - Sections 259 and 259 (2) of Cantonments Act, 1924, Sections 435 and 439 of Code of Criminal Procedure, Article 227 of Constitution of India, Cantonments (Amendment) Act, … Board; r. 26 provides for disposal of land' by private agreement; r. 28 for execution of leases, rr. 29 and 30 for maintenance of grants … acting under s. 259 of the Act acts as a persona designata and therefore his order under that section is not revisable under ss. 435/439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and the Sessions Judge and the

Shanmugadurai Vs. State of Tamil Nadu Rep. by Its Secretary and Commis ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Property

Acts : Constitution of India -- Article 14; Land Acquisition Act, 1894 -- Sections 4(1); Tamil Nadu Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1978 -- Sections 5-A and 6; Town and Country planning Act, 1971 -- Sections 17, 26, 27, 28 and 36 -- Rule 3; Tamil Nadu Housing Board Act -- Sections 70; Cantonment Act, 1924 -- Sections 12(3)

Reported in : 1999(2)CTC522

1990 are required to necessarily specify the purpose for which land is needed vis-a-vis the provisions of the Cantonment Act, 1924. It is true that when acquisition of the land was within the limits specified under Section … are required to necessarily specify the purpose for which land is needed vis-a-vis the provisions of the Cantonment Act, 1924. It is true that when acquisition of the land was within the limits specified under Section 4 and … Ran and other programmes as mentioned in Sections 17, 26, 27, and 28, it is not open to the Madras Metropolitan Development Authority to seek

Chief Executive Officer Vs. Surendra Kumar Vakil and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Property

Acts : Cantonment Land Administration Rules, 1925 - Rules 4 to 8; Cantonment Act, 1924 - Sections 184 and 280; Cantonment Act, 1924 - Sections 274; British statutes(Application to India) Repeal Act, 1960

Reported in : AIR1999SC2294; JT1999(2)SC315; 1999(2)SCALE208; (1999)3SCC555; [1999]2SCR118; (1999)2UPLBEC1360

bungalows in the cantonments all over India came in the hands of civilians.11. Under Section 280 of the Cantonments Act, 1924, power was given to the Governor General in Council to make rules for the purpose of carrying out … rights as S.N. Mukherjee had over the said property.7. The Cantonment Estate Officer, Sagar, by his letter dated 28.12.1984 advised the power-of-attorney holder - Soni to submit building plans and obtain permission for construction work on the

B. Lakshman and anr. Vs. the Union of India (Uoi), Ministry of Defence ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : CivilElection

Acts : Cantonments Act, 1924 - Sections 16(1), 17 and 54; Cantonment Act, 2006 - Sections 1(3), 2, 10, 10(2), 12, 13, 13(1), 13(3), 13(4), 14, 28, 29, 30, 32, 34, 60, 360, 360(1) and 360(2); A.P. Municipalities Act, 1965 - Sections 62, 62(1) and 62(4); Constitution of India - Articles 14, 21, 243B, 243P, 243Q and 243S

Reported in : 2008(2)ALD429; 2008(1)ALT443

elected vide notification dated 19.05.2006, which was notified by the Government of India under Section 16(1) of the Cantonments Act, 1924, the Cantonments Act 2006 (41 of 2006) has come into force w.e.f. 18.12.2006. By virtue of the said … the time of his election or nomination subject to any of the disqualifications specified in Sub-section (2) of Section 28 or in Section 29; or(b) has absented himself for more than three consecutive meetings or three months (whichever

Dr. Rajesh Kapoor vs.delhi Cantonment Board and Anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Copy of the JE’s report has been annexed as Annexure A8. to j. Notice u/s 185 of the Cantonments Act, 1924 was issued the... Petitioner on 15.03.2004 and 16.06.2004 against which he has preferred appeal before the competent authority. … It was the submission of Mr. Vikas Dhawan, learned counsel for the petitioner that the impugned order under section 249(1) of the Act is in violation of the principle of natural justice, inasmuch as the petitioner has … authority by the Junior Engineer (JE) vide its inspection report dated 24.02.2004, 28.02.2004 and 15.06.2004. Copy of the JE’s report has been annexed as Annexure

M.S.D. thenraja Vs. Executive Officer and anr.

Court : Chennai

Subject : ConstitutionElection

Acts : Election law; Cantonment Act, 1924 - Sections 27 and 28; The Cantonment Electoral Rules 1945 - Rules 4, 5, 6 and 47; Constitution of India - Article 226; Election Law

Reported in : 1997(2)CTC507

1997 filed his nomination to Ward No. 1.5. The elections to the Cantonment Board is regulated under the Cantonments Act, 1924 and the Cantonments Electoral Rules, 1945, hereinafter referred to, in short, as 'the Act' and 'the Rules', wherein … that if there are any arrears by any person, the Board has to give notice as prescribed Under Section 28(h). Even assuming without admitting that Thennammal Finance Private Limited is in arrears of payment of professional tax, the

P.V. Jaya Rao Vs. Cantonment Board, Secunderabad (Dn.)

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Civil

Acts : Cantonments Act, 1924 - Sections 179 and 181; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : AIR1961AP113

village of Busareddiguda, Baghat Ta-luq, Hyderabad District. He applied to the Cantonment Board under Section 179 of the Cantonments Act II of 1924 on 21-5-1954 for permission to build outhouses consisting of three rooms and a verandah and … has alleged that the Cantonment Board has no jurisdiction over his property in Busareddiguda as the notification dated 28-8-1906, issued in exercise of the powers conferred by Section 4 of the Cantonments Act (XIII of 1889) had