Advanced Search Results

Dr. K. Babu Vs. Cantonment Executive Officer and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : CivilProperty

Acts : Cantonments Act, 1924 - Sections 2, 2(4), 179, 181, 181A, 181(3), 194 and 194(2); Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 16; Cantonments (Amendment) Act, 2006 - Sections 261; Hyderabad Municipal Corporations Act, 1955; Aircraft Act

Reported in : 2008(2)ALD330

P.R. Prasad, learned Counsel representing the petitioner, had taken this Court through Sections 2(4) and 194 of the Cantonments Act, 1924 (for short hereinafter called 'the Act', for the purpose of convenience) and also had drawn the attention to … that sub-section.12. This is not a case concerned with building permission but only permission to raise compound wall. Section 261 of Act 41 of 2006 corresponds to Section 194 of the Act, which deals with boundary walls, hedges

Dr. K.S. Ashok Kumar S/O. Late Sri K. Sailoo Vs. the Cantonment Execut ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Civil

Acts : Cantonments Act, 1924 - Sections 2, 2(4), 179, 181, 181(3), 181A, 194 and 194(2); Cantonments (Amendment) Act, 2006 - Sections 261; Hyderabad Municipal Corporations Act, 1955; Aircraft Act; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 16

Reported in : 2008(1)ALD580

P.R. Prasad, learned Counsel representing the petitioner, had taken this Court through Sections 2(4) and 194 of the Cantonments Act, 1924 (for short hereinafter called 'the Act', for the purpose of convenience) and also had drawn the attention to … that sub-section.15. This is not a case concerned with building permission but only permission to raise compound wall. Section 261 of Act 41 of 2006 corresponds to Section 194 of the Act, which deals with boundary walls, hedges

Almitra H. Patel and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Environment

Acts : Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957 - Sections 42, 239 to 258, 350 to 364 and 397; New Delhi Municipal Council Act, 1994 - Sections 11, 171 to 194, 261 to 280, 298 to 299, 308 to 309, 386 to 388 and 390; Cantonments Act, 1924 - Sections 118, 128 to 130, 130A, 131 to 134 and 178; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 20 to 21; Management of Municipal Solid Waste (Management and Handing) Rules, 1999

Reported in : JT2000(2)SC341; 2000(1)SCALE568; (2000)2SCC166; [2000]1SCR841

ensure that the relevant provisions of the DMC Act, 1957, New Delhi Municipal Council Act, 1994 and the Cantonments Act, 1924 relating to sanitation and public health prohibiting accumulation of any rubbish, filth, garbage or other polluted obnoxious matters … shortage of judicial magistrates can be easily overcome by the Government appointing suitable persons as Executive Magistrates under Section 20 or Special Executive Magistrates under Section 21 of the CrPC who can be empowered to deal with

Purshottam Das Tandon Vs. Military Estate Officer

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Civil

Acts : Allahabad High Court Rules, 1952 - Rules 1(2) and 7; Constitution of India - Article 226; Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 11 - Order 2, Rule 2; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 114

Reported in : AIR2000All127; (2000)1UPLBEC738

casts a duty on the Military Estate Officer to maintain General Land Register of all lands in the Cantonments; Sub-rule (2) of Rule 3 states that no addition or alteration shall be made in General Land Register … and the Cantonment Act, 1910; with effect from 1924, the entire Cantonment matters are governed by the Cantonment Act, 1924, the Government of India has framed a number of Rules in order to manage the properties of the … res judicata.(b) Since the respondents under the Cantonment Act (Sections 185, 187, 261, 266 and 268, Chapter XII) were/are bound to correct their own records, … Rule 5 of C.P.C. as alleged by the defendant?(3) Whether notice under Section 80, C.P.C. served upon the defendant No. 2 is legal and valid.(4)

Indian Petro Chemicals Corporation Limited Vs. Air India Limited and O ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Arbitration

National Capital Territory of Delhi or in any other Union Territory, (viii) any Cantonment Board constituted under the Cantonments Act, 1924 (2 of 1924) and (3) in relation to the National Capital Territory of Delhi – (i) any premises … Order of Appellate Authority in para No. 22 of Misc. Application No. 261 of 2001 that the appellant was in arrears of Rs.11,20,21,405.90 upto 30th … Ranga Rao, Assistant Director, Legal and Administration, as Estate Officer issued a Notice dated 3rd November 1995 under section 4 of the PPE Act. In the said Notice the Estate Officer rightly did not mention any ground

In Re: the Delhi Laws Act, 1912, the Ajmer-merwara (Extension of Laws) ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 445

Reported in : [1951]2SCR747; AIR 1951 SC 332

authorized the extension of certain chapters to certain areas with modifications. 261. The next instance mentioned was the Cantonments Act, 1924. By section 9 of this Act it was provided, that the Central Government may by notification exclude from

Mrs. Tara Malik Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh and anr.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Municipal TaxConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 372(2); Cantonments Act, 1924 - Sections 60; Madhya Pradesh Nagariya Sthawar Sampatti Kar Adhiniyam, 1964 - Sections 4

Reported in : AIR1979MP188; 1979MPLJ555

any, payable by the assessee in respect of the lands or buildings to the Cantonment Board under the Cantonments Act, 1924. Section 36(1) prohibits a local authority, to which the Adhiniyam is made applicable, to impose or recover property tax … observed by the Bombay High Court in Cantonment Board, Poona v. W. I. Theatres Ltd., AIR 1954 Bom 261 'instances are not wanting in this country in which taxes are levied twice upon the same thing, once

Province of Bombay Vs. Madhukar Ganpat Nerlekar

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Service

Acts : Government of India (Amendment) Act, 1935 - Sections 33(2), 179(8) and 240 to 263; Bombay District Police Act, 1890 - Sections 27 and 29(3); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 9 and 80; Bombay District Police Rules - Rules 1278, 1278(6), 1278(7), 1278(10), 1278(11), 1281, 1284, 1284(8), 1284(9) and 1284(10); Constitution of India - Article 311; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 147 and 332; Bombay District Municipal Act, 1902; Government of India Act, 1915 - Sections 96B; Government of India (Amendment) Act, 1919; Bombay Municipal Boroughs Act - Sections 58

Reported in : AIR1952Bom37; (1951)53BOMLR754; ILR1952Bom269

Mr. Patel referred us to Thompson v. British Medical Association (N.S.W. Branch), 1924 A.C. 764 and pressed his point that if a domestic tribunal rightly … of our own Court in Ramji v. Naranji, 37 Bom. L R. 261, in which it was hold that if the requirements of natural justice … of Bombay in July 1940. On 1st January 1943, ho was posted to the Military Lines Police-Station, Poona Cantonment. One of the executive officers of the Cantonment wrote a letter on 25th January 1943, to the Police … the enquiry, that express and mandatory requirements of the rules and orders made under the Bombay District Police Act, 1890 (NO. iV [4] of 1890), were dis-regarded, and that even the provisions of Section 240, Government of

Railway Express Agency, Inc. Vs. Virginia

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

Co. v. Minnesota, 278 U. S. 503 (1929); Pullman Co. v. Richardson, 261 U. S. 330 (1923); Cudahy Packing Co. v. Minnesota, 246 U. S. … Court's decisions sustain the application of a fairly apportioned general gross receipts tax to an interstate transportation company. Canton R. Co. v. Rogan, 340 U. S. 511 , 340 U. S. 515 -516; Central Greyhound Lines, Inc. … ] Railway Express Agency v. Virginia, 347 U. S. 359 (1954). Subsequently, the Virginia General Assembly enacted the Act here involved, levying a "franchise tax" on express companies, measured by gross receipts from operations within Virginia, in … property tax, and in fact the rate, as established by the latter section, has been used before the "in lieu" provision as a basis for

Sheo Pratap Singh and ors. Vs. Emperor

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : AIR1930All820

in 1913, reported in Makhan Singh v. Gunner Jepson [1914] 15 Cr. L.J. 261. In that case the Cantonment Magistrate wrote a letter to an Assistant Commissioner suggesting that a person should be proceeded against for using … District Magistrate.10. I may also refer to Sarju Prasad v. Emperor A.I.R. 1924 All. 190, in which there was the report of a Magistrate to … P.C., of their right to have the case tried by another Court.2. This argument assumes chat the Magistrate acted under Section 190(1)(c). The record shows that the Magistrate issued process on receiving a writing from the Tahsildar