Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: cantonments act 1924 section 256 · Page 1 of about 62 results (0.025 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Sep 12 2007

Smt. Haannurammabai Kalal (Deceased) by L.R. Vs. Cantonment Board

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Sep-12-2007

Subject : Civil

Acts : Cantonments Act, 1924 - Sections 185, 185(1), 256, 268, 273, 273(1) and 273(4); Limitation Act; Tamil Nadu Estates (Abolition and Conversion into Ryotwari) Act, 1948 - Sections 64C; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 80

Reported in : 2008(3)KarLJ528; 2008(1)AIRKarR178; 2008AIHC1220(Kar); 2008AIHC1220(Kar)

issued under Section 185 of the Cantonments Act, 1924. All of a sudden, the appellant received notice under Section 256 of the Cantonments Act, 1924, as per Ex. P. 4, dated 2-3-1988 and as the appellant was directed … was projected, non-issuance of notice by appellant as required under Section 273(1) is not a serious infirmity. -- CANTONMENTS ACT, 1924. Section 254: Demolition of any erection Held, Notice prior to the action is mandatory, if not the action is

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 21 2003

Smt. Husenbi SadroddIn Shaiakh Vs. Cantonment Board, by Its Executive ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Mar-21-2003

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Cantonments Act, 1924 - Sections 179, 179(2) and 256; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 100

Reported in : AIR2003Kant281; ILR2003KAR1935; 2003(4)KarLJ241

defendant - Board restraining the Board from acting upon the notice issued by it under Section 256 of Cantonments Act, 1924 ('the Act' for short) on the ground that the Board was not entitled to initiate action under Section

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 28 1985

Vishwanath Goyal (Deceased by Lrs.) and ors. Vs. Cantonment Board, Agr ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Oct-28-1985

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Cantonment Act, 1924 - Sections 43A, 179, 180, 181(3), 181(6), 185, 185(1), 256 and 278 ; Cantonment (Amendment) Act, 1954; Cantonment Land Administration Rules, 1937 - Rule 9(5); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 9; Cantonment (Amendment) Act, 1983

Reported in : AIR1987All4

Vishwanath Goyal applied to the Cantonment Board for sanction by giving notice required under Section 179 of the Cantonments Act, 1924 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) on July 14, 1958. A written communication was sent by him thereafter … construction. Due allegedly to non^ compliance to this notice, the Board followed it up by an order under Section 256 of the Act to demolish the impugned construction. This was given by notice in writing dated 31st Aug.,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Apr 05 1990

T. Parathasarathy and ors. Vs. Smt. Madhu Sangal

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-05-1990

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Cantonments Act, 1924 - Sections 179, 181, 181(4), 181(5), 181(6), 185, 187, 254, 256, 259 and 272; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 3(22); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 39, Rule 2A; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 190, 200 to 205, 209 and 482; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 52, 149, 294, 341, 352, 392, 427, 448, 451 and 452

Reported in : 1992CriLJ26

Acts/Rules/Orders: Cantonments Act, 1924 - Sections 179, 181, 181(4), 181(5), 181(6), 185, 187, 254, 256, 259 and 272; General Clauses Act, 1897 … be caused to him on account of temporary injunction. Thereafter, on 4-4-1988, the Board issued a notice under Section 256 of the Act, requiring the said non-applicant to demolish the unauthorised construction. The legal validity of this notice

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 30 1999

M. Panduranga Rao Vs. Cheema Singh, Executive Officer, Secunderabad Ca ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Sep-30-1999

Subject : Contempt of Court

Acts : Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 - Sections 12; Cantonments Act, 1924 - Sections 256

Reported in : 1999(6)ALT57

the prevailing practice, once the appeal is filed against the proceedings initiated Under Section 185 (1) of the Cantonments Act, 1924 (for short 'the Act') status quo would be maintained until the appeal is placed before the appellate authority … by this Court.3. At any rate, as at present, action has been initiated by issuing necessary notice Under Section 256 of the Act, against the persons who are alleged to have made illegal constructions. Thus, the first respondent

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 05 1979

Mohanlal Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Nov-05-1979

Subject : Property

Acts : Cantonments Act, 1924 - Sections 185 and 256

Reported in : AIR1980MP87

notice was issued by the Executive Officer, Cantonment Board, Sagar, purporting to be under Section 185 of the Cantonments Act, 1924 stating that the petitioner had made certain new constructions without permission and directing the petitioner to demolish these … his old houses. The Executive Officer then issued a notice on 3rd January 1974 purporting to be under Section 256 that the unauthorised construction will be demolished on 29th January 1974. In this notice no finding was recorded

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 05 1971

S.M. Murad Ali Qureshi Vs. Cantonment Board, Varanasi and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Feb-05-1971

Subject : Civil

Acts : Cantonments Act, 1924 - Sections 185 and 187

Reported in : AIR1971All411

of the overheadpassage.The petitioner was required by that notice which purported to be under Section 185 of the Cantonments Act, 1924 to demolish the unauthorised constructions within 35 days of the receipt of the notice failing which action under … to demolish the unauthorised constructions within 35 days of the receipt of the notice failing which action under Section 256 of the Act was threatened. The petitioner made a representation against the notice which was finally rejected. The

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 13 2006

Dr. S. Vijaya Rama Rao and anr. Vs. Secunderabad Cantonment Board

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Feb-13-2006

Subject : Property

Acts : Cantonments Act 1924 - Sections 179, 180, 181, 181(1), 181(2), 181(3), 181(4), 181(5), 181(6), 185(1) and 256

Reported in : 2006(3)ALD260

Society Limited (for short, the Society). The petitioners made an application on 18.7.1992 Under Section 179 of the Cantonments Act 1924 (for short, the Act) informing the respondents their intention to construct residential houses and submitted plans with the … that they are entitled to construct building under deemed permission. Finally, on 31.8.2000 the respondent issued notice Under Section 256 of the Act directing demolition of the residential building, aggrieved by which present writ petition is filed.2. The

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 23 2008

Chief Executive Officer, Cantonment Board Vs. Tenzing Gopu Lama and Et ...

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : Jul-23-2008

Subject : Criminal

respectively.4. The complaints were filed by the Cantonment Board through its Estate Officer under Section 184 of the Cantonments Act, 1924 alleging illegal constructions on the land belonging to the Cantonment Board without due permission. Since the Offences were … two common questions of law are involved. The questions are whether any order of dismissal of complaint under Section 256 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (briefly 'Cr.P.C.') is appealable and secondly, what other recourse of law are

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 23 2005

Smt. Kamlesh Devi Vs. Cantonment Board and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Aug-23-2005

Subject : Property

Acts : Cantonment Act, 1924 - Sections 185, 256, 274 and 356; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : AIR2006All69; 2006(1)AWC107

reply dated 5.11.1995. After consideration of the reply the Board issued a notice under Section 185 of the Cantonments Act, 1924 on 24.4.1996 which was served on the son of the petitioner and her husband filed an appeal against … therefore, she repaired the same. However, the respondent claiming that new constructions were made, it issued notice under Section 256 of the Cantonment Act to her husband, who filed his reply which was rejected. The husband of the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial