Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: cantonments act 1924 section 249 · Page 1 of about 8 results (0.021 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jul 23 2008

Chief Executive Officer, Cantonment Board Vs. Tenzing Gopu Lama and Et ...

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : Jul-23-2008

Subject : Criminal

respectively.4. The complaints were filed by the Cantonment Board through its Estate Officer under Section 184 of the Cantonments Act, 1924 alleging illegal constructions on the land belonging to the Cantonment Board without due permission. Since the Offences were … of the same comptaint dismissed by a Magistrate. The relevant observations of the Apex Court are as follows:9. Section 249 of the Criminal P.C. enables a Magistrate to discharge the accused when the complainant is absent and when

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 09 2012

P.A. Mangalam Vs. the Chief Executive Officer, Chennai and Another

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Nov-09-2012

Subject : Land Acquisition

Limited. The petitioner submitted an application to erect, re-erect and alter a building under Section 235 of the Cantonments Act, 2006 (Form A) on 28.12.2011 in respect of the property situated at No.9, GST Road, St.Thomas Mount, Chennai … Appl. No.869 of 1961 in C.S.No.111 of 1955. Subsequently, Act II of 1924 was passed and it was amended by Act XXIV of 1936. Therefore, … valid notice as required by Sections 235 and 236. Section 248 contemplates power to demolish the building and Section 249 contemplates power to seal unauthorised construction. In view of the aforesaid provisions of the Act, the respondent reserves

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 25 2008

Voltas Ltd. and anr. Vs. Additional Collector and Competent Authority ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-25-2008

Subject : Property

Acts : Companies Act, 1913; Companies (Amendment) Act, 1956; Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 - Sections 6(1), 8(4), 9, 10(1), 10(3), 10(5), 11, 20 and 34; Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Repeal Act, 1999 - Sections 1(3), 2, 3, 3(1), 3(2) and 4; Principal Act - Sections 1(2), 2, 3, 3(1), 4, 5, 6 to 14, 15, 20, 20(1), 21, 23 and 34; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 6; Cantonments Act, 1924 - Sections 3; Finance Act, 1950 - Sections 2 and 13; Constitution of India - Articles 39, 249, 250, 252 and 252(1); Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Repeal Ordinance, 1999

Reported in : 2008(5)BomCR746

Union Territory or within the local limits of a cantonment declared as such under Section 3 of the Cantonments Act, 1924, means that State Government.Perusal of the above provisions shows that vesting of the land in the State Government … Parliament, on any other matter in respect of which it has no power to make law except Articles 249 and 250 of the Constitution of India. The effect of passing of resolution under Clause 1 of Article

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jul 01 2019

Dr. Rajesh Kapoor vs.delhi Cantonment Board and Anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jul-01-2019

Subject : Land Acquisition

Copy of the JE’s report has been annexed as Annexure A8. to j. Notice u/s 185 of the Cantonments Act, 1924 was issued the... Petitioner on 15.03.2004 and 16.06.2004 against which he has preferred appeal before the competent authority. … It was the submission of Mr. Vikas Dhawan, learned counsel for the petitioner that the impugned order under section 249(1) of the Act is in violation of the principle of natural justice, inasmuch as the petitioner has not

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 19 1996

New Delhi Municipal Committee Vs. State of Punjab, Etc. Etc.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Dec-19-1996

Subject : Municipal TaxConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 54, 133, 142, 239, 240, 241, 242, 243, 244, 245 ot 255, 256 to 263, 285, 289(1), 357, 367 and 372; Punjab Municipal Act, 1911 - Sections 61; Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957; New Delhi Municipal Council Act, 1994 - Sections 60, 62 and 119; Government of India Act, 1935 - Sections 5, 6, 94, 99, 100, 104, 154, 155(1) and 311(1); General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 3(58); Sea Customs Act, 1878 - Sections 20; Central Excises Act, 1944 - Sections 3; Government of India Act, 1919; Government of Part C States Act, 1951 - Sections 21, 22 and 38(22); Reorganisation Act, 1956; Union Territory by the Punjab (Reorganisation) Act, 1966; Government of Union Territories Act, 1963; State of Himachal Pradesh Act, 1970; North-Eastern Areas (Reorganisation) Ac

Reported in : AIR1997SC2847; JT1997(1)SC40; 1996(9)SCALE613; (1997)7SCC339; [1996]Supp10SCR472

on Property, such as, in the case of Entry 3, List I which deals with Cantonments and the Cantonments Act, 1924 which allows Parliament to levy taxes for Contonments. Mr. Sen then contended that such a power would be … law imposing a tax not mentioned in either List-II or List-III. Articles 249, 250, 252 and 357 confer upon the Parliament power to make laws … the 1st day of October, 1912. Schedule-A to the Act defined the 'territory' covered by the new Province. Sections 2 and 3 of the 1912 Act provided inter alia that the creation of the new Province of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 25 1932

Basant Rai and ors. Vs. Lala Ganga Ram and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Feb-25-1932

Subject : Civil

Reported in : AIR1932All386

vitiated by a misappreciation of Section 249, Cantonment Act (Act 2 of 1924). This section provides:Whoever obstructs or molests any person employed by a cantonment … as before. The Executive Officer thereupon prosecuted the plaintiffs Ganga Ram and Piare Lal for an offence under Section 249, Cantonment Code, (obstructing the contractor of the Cantonment Committee in the realization of rent). The plaintiffs Ganga Ram … filed in this Court and will be disposed of by this judgment.3. Jaswant was a contractor from the Cantonment Committee for collecting certain rents. The prosecution in respect of which damages are claimed by the plaintiffs was … first letter, dated 3rd June 1925, sent by the defendant Basant Rai, acting for Jaswant Rai, to the Executive Officer, Cantonment, complained that a number

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 28 2003

Secunderabad Cantonment Board, Andhra Circle, Secunderabad Rep. by Exe ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Nov-28-2003

Subject : Civil

Acts : Cantonment Act, 1924 - Sections 181, 181(3), 181(4) and 280; ;Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976; ;Record of the Rights Regulation Act - Sections 15(2); ;Land Revenue Act - Sections 158; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 11 and 79 - Order 27, Rule 3; ;Administrative Law; Constitution of India - Article 226; Cantonment Land Administration Rules, 1934 - Rules 3 and 10

Reported in : 2004(3)ALT27(SC); JT2003(9)SC316; 2003(10)SCALE33; (2003)12SCC315; (2004)1UPLBEC882

Cantonment Land Administration Rules, 1937 have been trained by virtue of power vested under Section 280 of the Cantonments Act, 1924. Rule 10 in Chapter III of the Cantonment Land Administration Rules deals with maintenance of General Land Register. … Ahmad, learned Addl. Solicitor General, has then referred to 'Administrative Law' by Sir William Wade, eighth edition, page 249, relevant part of which reads as under:-'Like other forms of estoppel already discussed, res judicata plays a restricted

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 19 1932

Sorrells Vs. United States

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Dec-19-1932

Subject : MRTP

been "on his job continuously without missing a pay day since March, 1924." Witness identified the timesheet showing this employment. This witness and three others … identity. United States v. Healy, 202 F. 349; Voves v. United States, 249 F.191. In the second class are found cases such as those of … a time in Haywood County, North Carolina, where he posed as a tourist, he visited defendant's home near Canton on Sunday, July 13, 1930, accompanied by three residents of the county who knew the defendant well. He … unjust, another construction should be adopted if possible. P. 287 U. S. 446 . 2. The National Prohibition Act, though denouncing generally as criminal the sale of intoxicating liquor for beverage purposes, was Page 287 U. S.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial