Advanced Search Results

Chief Executive Officer, Cantonment Board Vs. Tenzing Gopu Lama and Et ...

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Criminal

respectively.4. The complaints were filed by the Cantonment Board through its Estate Officer under Section 184 of the Cantonments Act, 1924 alleging illegal constructions on the land belonging to the Cantonment Board without due permission. Since the Offences were … the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in the case of Krishnan v. Krishnaveni reported in (1997) 4 SCC 241 : 1997 Cri LJ 1519. The relevant observations of the Apex Court are as follows:The object of Section

Zila Parishad (District Board) Vs. Smt. Shanti Devi and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : ContractLimitation

Acts : Uttar Pradesh District Boards Act, 1922 - Sections 192, 192(1) and 192(3); Uttar Pradesh General Clauses Act, 1904 - Sections 4(2); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 20 - Order 2, Rule 2 - Order 6, Rule 3; Limitation Act, 1908 - Schedule - Articles 56 and 120

Reported in : AIR1965All590

Act are an exact copy of theprovisions of section 326 of the Municipalities Act. Section 273 of the Cantonments Act, 1924, lays downthat '(1) No suit shall be instituted against any Board ...... in respect of any act done, … 'Words and Phrases', p. 84 and Supplement, p. 33. In Vithoba Babaji v. Sholapur Municipality AIR 1947 Bom 241 it was said that there is no material difference as to the principle involved between the words of

Kalpataru Builders and Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Cantonment Act, 1924 - Sections 179, 181, 181(2), 181(3), 181(4), 181(6), 181(A), 185, 185(1) and 274; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 108; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2005(4)ALLMR751; 2005(6)BomCR787

of the objection raised by the Respondent No. 3 - Defence Estate Officer under section 181(3) of the Cantonments Act, 1924 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'). Respondents Nos. 1 to 3 and 6 to this petition are the … General in Council. The said plot was later-on divided into two sub-plots. The petition is concerning sub-plot No. 241-A which was to be used for commercial purpose. The lease was for 30 years. On 13th March 1981,

Saradhakar Naik and ors. Vs. the King

Court : Orissa

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Orissa Maintenance of Public Order Act, 1948 - Sections 1; Extra-Provincial Jurisdiction Act, 1947 - Sections 3; Orissa Government's Administration of Orissa States Order, 1948

Reported in : AIR1950Ori67

to be the position of the residences and other stations on the occupation of political officers, and of cantonments in the occupation of British troops.'57. The learned author draws the following, conclusions after a comprehensive review of … P. 3 ) ; Duff Development Co., Ltd. v. Govt. of Kelanton, 1924 A. C. 797 : (93 L. J. Ch. 343); The Empress v. … S Cal. 987 : (11 C L. R. 241 F. B.) and Bichitranund Dass v. Bhuybut Perai, … that, under the circumstances, the notification of the Orisaa Govern. meat extending the Orissa Maintenance of Public Order Act, 1948, to the said States was ultra virea and, the arrest and detention of the prisoners were illegal, … was, however, disclosed therein that the petitioners were being prosecuted some under Section 6 and some under Section 11 of the Act, for having committed

Sorrells Vs. United States

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : MRTP

been "on his job continuously without missing a pay day since March, 1924." Witness identified the timesheet showing this employment. This witness and three others … , 197 U. S. 39 ; United States v. Jin Fuey Moy, 241 U. S. 394 , 241 U. S. 402 ; Baender v. Barnett, … a time in Haywood County, North Carolina, where he posed as a tourist, he visited defendant's home near Canton on Sunday, July 13, 1930, accompanied by three residents of the county who knew the defendant well. He … unjust, another construction should be adopted if possible. P. 287 U. S. 446 . 2. The National Prohibition Act, though denouncing generally as criminal the sale of intoxicating liquor for beverage purposes, was Page 287 U. S.

Smt. Penumatcha Subhadrayyamma Vs. the Revenue Divisional Officer, Eas ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Property

Acts : Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 4(1), 23 and 28; Madras Land Acquisition (Amendment) Act, 1953

Reported in : AIR1963AP466

its possibilities in the future'.In Govt. of Bombay v. Ismail Ahmed, AIR 1924 Bom 362, Mullah, J. followed the decision in AIR 1922 Bom 399 … to Mr. Jahr on Eminent Domain, Valuation and Procedure, 1953 Edn. page 241. The learned Author points out that in the case of a school, … AIR 1939 PC 235. An analysis of the facts clearly shows that the site was situated in a cantonment belonging to the Government. What had to be determined in the case was the value of the buildings … The claimant Penumatcha Subhadrayyamma has preferred Appeal No. 133 of 1959 under Section 54 of the Land Acquisition Act claiming enhancement of compensation. Appeal No. 201 of 1959 was filed by the Revenue Divisional Officer, Rajahmundry against

Railway Express Agency, Inc. Vs. Virginia

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

Court's decisions sustain the application of a fairly apportioned general gross receipts tax to an interstate transportation company. Canton R. Co. v. Rogan, 340 U. S. 511 , 340 U. S. 515 -516; Central Greyhound Lines, Inc. … ] Railway Express Agency v. Virginia, 347 U. S. 359 (1954). Subsequently, the Virginia General Assembly enacted the Act here involved, levying a "franchise tax" on express companies, measured by gross receipts from operations within Virginia, in … property tax, and in fact the rate, as established by the latter section, has been used before the "in lieu" provision as a basis for