Advanced Search Results

Rohit Gera Vs. Pune Cantonment Board Golibar Maidan and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

did not amount to any material alteration in terms of provision of Section 179 (2) (a) of the Cantonments Act, 1924. It may be noted that provisions of Section 179 (2) (a) of the Cantonments Act, 1924 are in … making any material alteration in the building and hence there was no occasion to invoke the provision of Section 235 (2) (a) of the said Act. Relying upon the decision of the Allahabad High Court in the case

Jagat Singh S/O Late Chaudhary Badri Singh Vs. the Estate Officer, Del ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : PropertyConstitution

Acts : Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorized Occupants) Act, 1971 - Sections 2, 2(1), 2(2), 3, 3(1), 4(1), 5A, 5A(1), 5A(2), 5B, 5C and 9; Wealth Tax Act, 1957; Cantonments Act, 1924 - Sections 10, 108, 178A, 184 and 185; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Cantonment Land Administration Rules, 1937; Cantonment Property Rules, 1925; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 3; Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorized Occupants) (Amendment) Act, 1980

Reported in : 2002VAD(Delhi)713; 98(2002)DLT151; 2002(63)DRJ756

as defined in Section 2(e) of the Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorized Occupants) Act, 1971 read with the Cantonments Act, 1924 is the subject of decision in this case.Facts 2. The Petitioner is said to be in unauthorized occupation … to act as an Estate Officer under the provisions of the Act. Reliance was placed on S.R.O. No. 235 dated 21st July, 1978 issued under Section 3 of the Act whereby the Cantonment Executive Officer was appointed

P.A. Mangalam Vs. the Chief Executive Officer, Chennai and Another

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Limited. The petitioner submitted an application to erect, re-erect and alter a building under Section 235 of the Cantonments Act, 2006 (Form A) on 28.12.2011 in respect of the property situated at No.9, GST Road, St.Thomas Mount, Chennai … orders vide order dated 29.08.1961 in Appl. No.869 of 1961 in C.S.No.111 of 1955. Subsequently, Act II of 1924 was passed and it was amended by Act XXIV of 1936. Therefore, the people who owned the land

Union of India Vs. Ibrahim UddIn and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure(CPC) 1908 - Order 41 Rule 27, Order 7 Rule 17, Section 100; Indian Evidence Act, 1872 - Section 114(g), 58, 17 to 31, 68, 65, 74, 90; Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Section 34 ; Cantonment Act, 1924 - Section 43A

outside the notified area and to establish that such area was declared under Section 43A of the Cantonment Act, 1924. In the circumstances, I do not find that it is a case where this court in exercise of … including Messrs. Trojan & Co. v. RM.N.N. Nagappa Chettiar, AIR 1953 SC 235; Om Prakash Gupta v. Ranbir B. Goyal, AIR 2002 SC 665; Ishwar … on the Will, which was liable to be ignored altogether and making reference to the record of the Cantonment Board. In case, the Union of India did not produce the revenue record before the trial Court, the

Secretary to Government of India, Ministry of Defence and anr. Vs. Ind ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Property

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 3, Rule 2; Cantonments Act, 1924; Cantonments Rules, 1925; Land Revenue Act; Land Regulations; Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 34; Practice of Civil Rules - Rule 32

Reported in : AIR2003AP329; 2003(4)ALD302

Register held that there is no statutory base for the General Statutory Register since the whole of the Cantonments Act, 1924 and the Rules framed in 1925 are not applicable to the Secunderabad Cantonment and they were applicable only … 19 exists in between the boundary of the suit land and Sy.Nos. 235 and 248; Pillar No. 20 exists in between boundaries of the suit … which are dealt with seriatum.9. The first contention raised by the learned Standing Counsel is that notice under Section 80 of Code of Civil Procedure Code (for short 'the Code') was not issued by the plaintiffs and

Jindal Strips Limited and anr. Vs. State of Haryana and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Sales Tax/Vat

Reported in : (2008)12VST149(P& H)

1973 (Haryana Act 24 of 1973), or a Town Board or a Cantonment Board established under the Cantonment Act, 1924 (Central Act 2 of 1924), or a Zila Parishad established under the Haryana Panchayati Raj Act, 1994 (Haryana … mean the areas within the limits of a (i) Municipal Corporation, (ii) Municipality, (iii) Notified area committee, (iv) Cantonment board, (v) Town board, (vi) Mines board, (vii) Municipal board, (viii) Gram panchayat and (ix) any other local … supply and sanitation were meant to facilitate freeflow of trade and since Section 22 of the Act provided for distribution of tax collected among local

Abhimanyu Singh and Others. Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh, and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh Jabalpur

Subject : Civil Constitution

Acts : Madhya Pradesh Municipal Corporation Act, 1956 - Sections 80(5) ; The Constitution Of India 1949 - Article 295 ;

substantial question of law relating to interpretation of Article 295 of the Constitution and the provisions of the Cantonments Act, 1924 have been raised on behalf of civilian residents of Mhow by the petitioner-association contending that it is the … People's Union for Democratic Rights vs. Union of India, (1982) 3 SCC 235 the Supreme Court while dealing with the scope and ambit of public … in Nav Jeevan Vihar in Singrauli District. Similarly, in order to provide housing accommodation to needy and weaker sections of the society, during the aforesaid period 120 Lower Income Group (LIG) quarters having an area approximately 540

Raja Suryapalsingh and ors. Vs. the U.P. Govt.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950; Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1951 - Sections 4(2), 27, 113 and 114; Constitution of India - Articles 13, 14, 19(1), 25, 25(1), 26, 31, 31(2), 31(4), 245, 246 and 294; ; Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 6; Govt. of India Act - Sections 299; ; Crown Grants Act, 1895 - Sections 3; Constitutional Law; Uttar Pradesh Panchayat Raj Act, 1947 - Sections 3 and 4

Reported in : AIR1951All674

to membership of a particular body; see, for example, the Indian Bar Councils Act, 1926, Section 4, the Cantonment Act, 1924, Sections 13(8), 18(4) & 13(5), the United Provinces District Boards Act, 1922, Section 4(2) & the … membership of a particular body; see, for example, the Indian Bar Councils Act, 1926, Section 4, the Cantonment Act, 1924, Sections 13(8), 18(4) & 13(5), the United Provinces District Boards Act, 1922, Section 4(2) & the United Provinces … applies to Section 104 relating to Rehabilitation Grant. Sections 4, 117 & 235 (4) are instances of conditional legislation, while Sections 2(1), 45, 48, 98,

Rajesh Agarwal Vs. Union of India and ors

Court : Delhi

Subject : Right to Information

Acts : Cantonments Act, 2006 - Section 57; Right to Information Act (RTI), 2005

some detail hereafter, and the issues arising for determination, necessitate an examination of the relevant statutory provisions. The Cantonments Act, 1924 („CA 1924) was enacted to consolidate and amend the law relating to administration of cantonments. Section 10 CA … The Petitioner, on 7th December 2007 again applied to the CB by giving a written statutory notice under Section 235 of the CA 2006 (which replaced the CA 1924). The said application was considered by the CB and

Smt. Penumatcha Subhadrayyamma Vs. the Revenue Divisional Officer, Eas ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Property

Acts : Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 4(1), 23 and 28; Madras Land Acquisition (Amendment) Act, 1953

Reported in : AIR1963AP466

AIR 1939 PC 235. An analysis of the facts clearly shows that the site was situated in a cantonment belonging to the Government. What had to be determined in the case was the value of the buildings … its possibilities in the future'.In Govt. of Bombay v. Ismail Ahmed, AIR 1924 Bom 362, Mullah, J. followed the decision in AIR 1922 Bom 399 … The claimant Penumatcha Subhadrayyamma has preferred Appeal No. 133 of 1959 under Section 54 of the Land Acquisition Act claiming enhancement of compensation. Appeal No. 201 of 1959 was filed by the Revenue Divisional Officer, Rajahmundry against