Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: cantonments act 1924 section 232 · Page 1 of about 9 results (0.027 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Oct 30 2007

Dr. K.S. Ashok Kumar S/O. Late Sri K. Sailoo Vs. the Cantonment Execut ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Oct-30-2007

Subject : Civil

Acts : Cantonments Act, 1924 - Sections 2, 2(4), 179, 181, 181(3), 181A, 194 and 194(2); Cantonments (Amendment) Act, 2006 - Sections 261; Hyderabad Municipal Corporations Act, 1955; Aircraft Act; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 16

Reported in : 2008(1)ALD580

P.R. Prasad, learned Counsel representing the petitioner, had taken this Court through Sections 2(4) and 194 of the Cantonments Act, 1924 (for short hereinafter called 'the Act', for the purpose of convenience) and also had drawn the attention to … filed by the first respondent.3. Sri P.R. Prasad, learned Counsel representing the petitioner, had taken this Court through Sections 2(4) and 194 of the Cantonments Act, 1924 (for short hereinafter called 'the Act', for the purpose of … 1983, dated 07.10.1983 of Book I, Vol. No. 1174 from 219 to 232 and from the date of purchase, he has been in possession and

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 05 1981

K. Nagabhushanam and ors. Vs. Collector, Krishna Distirct and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Sep-05-1981

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Andhra Pradesh Municipalities Act, 1965 - Sections 3; Andhra Pradesh Gram Panchayats Act, 1964 - Sections 3, 3(1), 3(2) and 232; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 40 and 226; Andhra Pradesh Gram Panchayats (Declaration of Village) Rules, 1969 - Rule 12

Reported in : AIR1982AP123

the same in the immediate neighbourhood of one another but does not include a cantonment governed by the Cantonments Act, 1924, S. 1 (2) of the gram Panchayats Act extends to the whole of the State of Andhra Pradesh … to the collector's notification in R.O.C. No. 9083/79-S1 dted 27-9-1979. There was no revision filed by anybody under Section 232 of the Gram Panchayats Act. The stay granted by the Government in its memorandum No. 3471/Panchayats IV/A1/79 dated

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 26 2003

P. Gyan Chander Vs. Secunderabad Cantonment Board and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Aug-26-2003

Subject : Property

Acts : Cantonments Act, 1924 - Sections 179, 282 and 283

Reported in : 2003(6)ALD65

the Supreme Court in Poonam v. Municipal Coporation of Delhi, 2000 (5) Supreme 363.6. Section 179 of the Cantonments Act, 1924 (for short, the Act) requires every person who intended to erect or re-erect any building in a cantonment … ORDERV.V.S. Rao, J.1. The petitioner claims that he allegedly purchased plot No. 17, admeasuring 232 Sq. yards in S.No. 157/9 (New S.No. 157/ 10) situated at Thokatta Village, Secunderabad, by registered sale deed

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Mar 13 2003

Secretary to Government of India, Ministry of Defence and anr. Vs. Ind ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Mar-13-2003

Subject : Property

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 3, Rule 2; Cantonments Act, 1924; Cantonments Rules, 1925; Land Revenue Act; Land Regulations; Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 34; Practice of Civil Rules - Rule 32

Reported in : AIR2003AP329; 2003(4)ALD302

Register held that there is no statutory base for the General Statutory Register since the whole of the Cantonments Act, 1924 and the Rules framed in 1925 are not applicable to the Secunderabad Cantonment and they were applicable only … other High Courts also referred to the unreported judgment in C.A. No. 232 of 1963, dated 11.1.1963. The following is the extract:'There is no dispute … which are dealt with seriatum.9. The first contention raised by the learned Standing Counsel is that notice under Section 80 of Code of Civil Procedure Code (for short 'the Code') was not issued by the plaintiffs and

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 31 2000

Godfrey Philips India Ltd. and anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : May-31-2000

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 246, 301 and 304; Rajasthan Tax on Entry of Goods Into Local Areas Act, 1999 - Sections 2(2), 3, 3(1) and 44; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 114; Additional Duties of Excise (Goods of Special Importance) Act, 1957; Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, 1994; Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, 1954 - Sections 4(2)

Reported in : [2001]121STC54(Raj)

substantial part of the tax collected is utilised. Under the taxing provisions of the Punjab Motor Vehicles Taxation Act, 1924 and in other States, were found to be similar taxing legislations by respective State Legislatures wherein statutory outer … Tea Co. Ltd. v. State of Assam reported in AIR 1961 SC 232, Automobile Transport (Rajasthan) Ltd. v. State of Rajasthan reported in AIR 1962 … 1994 or a municipality established under the Rajasthan Municipalities Act, 1959 or a notified area committee or a cantonment board, constituted or established under any law for the time being in force. Sub-section (2) of Section 2

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 21 2007

Dinesh Pouches Ltd. Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Aug-21-2007

Subject : Sales Tax/VAT

Reported in : (2008)16VST387(Raj)

which came into existence after the commencement of the Constitution constituting municipalities or other institutions of self-governance like cantonments, notified area or panchayats had provided for levy and collection of octroi, that is to say, tax on … under the Haryana Municipal Act, 1973, or a Town Board or a Cantonment Board established under the Cantonment Act, 1924, or a zila parishad established under the Haryana Panchayati Raj Act, 1994, or any other local authority constituted … is well-settled in the case of Atiabari Tea Co. AIR 1961 SC 232. It is equally important to note that in Atiabari Tea Co. AIR … the local area and the phrase 'local area' has been defined in Section 2(14) of that Act to mean 'an area within the limits of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 01 2008

Indian Oil Corporation Limited Vs. State of Haryana and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Oct-01-2008

Subject : Sales Tax/VAT

Reported in : (2009)21VST10(P& H)

established under the Haryana Municipal Act, 1973 (Haryana Act 24 of 1973), or a Town Board or a Cantonment Board established under the Cantonment Act, 1924 (Central Act 2 of 1924), or a Zila Parishad established under … 1973 (Haryana Act 24 of 1973), or a Town Board or a Cantonment Board established under the Cantonment Act, 1924 (Central Act 2 of 1924), or a Zila Parishad established under the Haryana Panchayati Raj Act, 1994 (Haryana … explained the majority view in Atiabari Tea Co. Limited AIR 1961 SC 232 by observing that freedom under article 301 has to be understood in … above definition of local area, the whole State, for the purposes of Section 25, shall be treated as one local area..(zm) 'value of the goods'

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 19 2013

State of U.P. Thru Secy. Lucknow Vs. Jagdish Chandra

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Aug-19-2013

Subject : Land Acquisition

Union territory or within the local limits of a cantonment declared as such under section 3 of the Cantonments Act, 1924 (2 of 1924), means that State Government." Section 11 of the Act, 1976 deals with payment of amount … continued after the repeal." The Apex Court in Mohan Raj Vs. Dimbeswari Saikia and Anr, AIR 2007, SC 232, has quoted the above passage with approval in paragraph 23 which is quoted below: "23. It is now

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 21 2012

ChaIn Singh Vs. Shri Mata Vaishno Devi Shrine Board and ors

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Decided on : Nov-21-2012

Subject : Land Acquisition

Zamindary Company limited vs. Kumar Naresh Narayan Roy & others, reported as 1924 Privy Council 144 (at page 147).20. The Boards learned counsels plea that … the premises, which was otherwise, in law, impermissible.17. The view taken by this Court in Beant Singh v. Cantonment Executive Officer, Jammu, reported as AIR 196.Jammu and Kashmir, 83 reads thus: The learned counsel for the appellant … Devi Dharmarth Trust at annual rent of Rs. 15,000/-. After the Jammu and Kashmir Mata Vaishno Devi Shrine Act, 1986 (Governors Act, later replaced by the Act of legislature in 1988), the petitioner claimed to have become … observations referred to above were in connection with a Suit filed under Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 or analogous provisions in the … v. State of Uttar Pradesh, (1977) 2 SCR 232.The Division Bench comprising of three learned judges held

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial