Advanced Search Results

T. Parathasarathy and ors. Vs. Smt. Madhu Sangal

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Cantonments Act, 1924 - Sections 179, 181, 181(4), 181(5), 181(6), 185, 187, 254, 256, 259 and 272; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 3(22); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 39, Rule 2A; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 190, 200 to 205, 209 and 482; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 52, 149, 294, 341, 352, 392, 427, 448, 451 and 452

Reported in : 1992CriLJ26

Acts/Rules/Orders: Cantonments Act, 1924 - Sections 179, 181, 181(4), 181(5), 181(6), 185, 187, 254, 256, 259 and 272; General Clauses Act, 1897 … Acts/Rules/Orders: Cantonments Act, 1924 - Sections 179, 181, 181(4), 181(5), 181(6), 185, 187, 254, 256, 259 and 272; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Section … for sanction of the Board under Section 179 of the Act on 22-12-1986 and submitted map and other details of the new construction as required

Municipal Corporation for City of Pune and Another Vs. Bharat Forge Co ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Other Taxes

Acts : Cantonments Act, 1880 - Sections 21, 22; Cantonments Act, 1924 - Sections 45(1), 60 to 63 and 81(2) and 255; General Clauses Act - Sections 21; Constitution of India - Articles 21, 226 and 265; Bombay Municipal Act, 1872; Bombay District Municipal Act, 1873; Cantonments Act, 1910; Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporations Act, 1949 - Sections 32(4); Limitation Act, 1623; Sex Disqualification Act, 1919; Statute Law (Repeals) Act, 1906; Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 - Sections 8(2); Cantonment (Extention of Rent Control Laws) Act, 1957 - Sections 3

Reported in : AIR1996SC2856; JT1995(3)SC312; 1995(2)SCALE245; (1995)3SCC434a; [1995]2SCR716; (1995)2UPLBEC740; (1995) 3 SCC 434

Notification relating to assessment, collection and recovery of octroi duties.8. After the aforesaid Notifications had been issued, the Cantonments Act, 1924 was enacted. Chapter V of this Act is on the subject of 'Taxation'; and Sections 60 to 63 … Governor-General in Council, by notification in the Official Gazette, any tax which could be imposed in a Municipality. Section 22 of this Act permitted the Local Government by notification in Official Gazette to apply and adapt to any

Taramati Nandkishore Sharma Vs. Cantonment Board and anr.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Service

Acts : Cantonment Fund Servants Rules, 1937 - Rule 22 and 22(1); Central Government, Ministry of Defence and Cantonments Act, 1924 - Sections 280; Madhya Pradesh Shiksha Adhiniyam, 1965 - Sections 25 and 28; Madhya Pradesh Shiksha Regulations - Regulation 71

Reported in : 1995(0)MPLJ159

in the light of the relevant service regulations and Education Code prevalent in the concerned State where the Cantonments are situated. The contention advanced on behalf of the petitioners cannot be accepted that the circular results in … 22(1) of the Cantonment Fund Servants Rules, 1937 (for short, 'Rules'), framed under Section 280 of the Cantonment Act, 1924 (for short, 'Act') till the attainment of the age of sixty years so as to push the position

Agricultural Produce Market Committee, Narela, Delhi Vs. Commissioner ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2(1), 10, 10(20), 10(26AAB) and 260A; Finance Act, 2002; Cantonments Act, 1924 - Sections 3; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 3(31); Delhi Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation) Act, 1998 - Sections 5, 22(1), 22(2), 62 65, 88, 88(1), 88(2) and 88(3); Delhi Development Act, 1957; Payment of Bonus Act, 1965 - Sections 32; Constitution of India (Seventy-third Amendment) Act, 1992; Constitution of India (Seventy-fourth Amendment) Act, 1992; Constitution of India - Articles 243, 243P, 243 and 243ZF

Reported in : (2008)218CTR(SC)433; [2008]305ITR1(SC); JT2008(10)SC17; 2008(11)SCALE540; (2008)9SCC434; 2008AIRSCW6285; 2008(6)Supreme520; 2008(11)SCALE540

management of a Municipal or local fund; or (iv) Cantonment Board as defined in Section 3 of the Cantonments Act, 1924 (2 of 1924);12. Mr. M.L. Verma, learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of the appellants, submitted that AMC(s) … make recommendations to the Director for establishing principal market and sub-markets as per provisions of Sub-section (2) of Section 22; (b) to approve proposal for providing infrastructural facilities in the market and market area; (c) to construct a

S.C. Bhattacharji Vs. Meerut Cantonment Board

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Municipal TaxLimitation

Acts : Cantonment Act, 1924 - Sections 15, 16, 22(1), 25, 60(2), 68, 69, 71, 84, 98, 99 and 99(2); ;Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 5

Reported in : 2005(3)AWC2613; 2005(2)ESC1029

of the case. In my opinion, order of the appellate authority is wholly erroneous.9. Section 99(2)(b) of the Cantonments Act, 1924 reads as follows :'99. Exemption in the case of buildings.--(1) When, in pursuance of Section 98, Board has … 1991 filed by the appellant-company against the order of the learned Single Judge dated August 14, 1991. Section 22(1) of the Act could not, therefore, be invoked and there was no impediment in the High Court dealing

A.P. Sarpanches Association and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Election

Acts : Andhra Pradesh Legislative Council Act, 2005 - Sections 4; Representation of People Act, 1950 - Sections 15, 16, 18, 22, 23, 27, 27(1) and 27(2); Andhra Pradesh Panchayat Raj Act, 1994 - Sections 2(17), 2(18), 2(23), 2(45), 6, 8, 11, 12, 14(1), 45, 117, 140, 148, 148(1), 149(1), 150, 151, 161, 177(1), 177(2), 177(3), 178, 179, 192 and 222; Representation of People (Amendment) Act, 1963; Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Act, 1955 - Sections 1A, 1B, 1C, 5 and 8 to 12; Andhra Pradesh Municipalities Act, 1965 - Sections 8 to 12; Cantonments Act, 1924; Cantonments Act, 2006; Municipal Corporations Act, 1994; Andhra Pradesh Districts (Formation) Act, 1974 - Sections 3; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 169, 169(1), 171, 171(1) to 171(4), 243, 243A, 243B, 243E, 243G, 243K, 243P and 243Q

Reported in : AIR2007AP273; 2007(4)ALD783; 2007(5)ALT707

owe their existence to the Andhra Pradesh Municipalities Act, 1965, the Cantonment Boards owe their existence to the Cantonments Act, 1924 (The 1924 Act has been repealed by the Cantonments Act, 2006), and Zilla Parishads and Mandal Parishads owe … as of right is the moot question which arises for determination in this petition filed for striking down Section 4(b) of the Andhra Pradesh Legislative Council Act, 2005 (for short, 'the 2005 Act') and for issue of … other States. It has been further averred that pursuant to resolution dated 22-1-1990 passed by the Andhra Pradesh Legislative Assembly, a Bill for revival of

Jagat Singh S/O Late Chaudhary Badri Singh Vs. the Estate Officer, Del ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : PropertyConstitution

Acts : Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorized Occupants) Act, 1971 - Sections 2, 2(1), 2(2), 3, 3(1), 4(1), 5A, 5A(1), 5A(2), 5B, 5C and 9; Wealth Tax Act, 1957; Cantonments Act, 1924 - Sections 10, 108, 178A, 184 and 185; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Cantonment Land Administration Rules, 1937; Cantonment Property Rules, 1925; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 3; Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorized Occupants) (Amendment) Act, 1980

Reported in : 2002VAD(Delhi)713; 98(2002)DLT151; 2002(63)DRJ756

as defined in Section 2(e) of the Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorized Occupants) Act, 1971 read with the Cantonments Act, 1924 is the subject of decision in this case.Facts 2. The Petitioner is said to be in unauthorized occupation … the above encroachment which is in your unauthorised occupation, be not removed and where as your reply dated 22.3.1997 received on 25.3.1997 to the notice dated 5.3.1997 has been considered and you have not been able to

State Vs. Hiranand

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Cantonments Act, 1924 - Sections 22 and 42; Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 - Sections 6; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 197; Cantonment Board Rules - Rule 7

Reported in : AIR1958MP2; 1958CriLJ41

sanction is vitiated by the failure of the Cantonment Board to comply strictly with certain provisions of the Cantonments Act and the Rules framed thereunder.11. Mr. Patel, learned Deputy Government Advocate emphatically denied that the Board had sanctioned … well founded. Signing the sanction is not a statutory duty conferred on the President and the provisions of Section 22 have no application to this case. The resolution was passed by the meeting which was presided over by

Jindal Stripe Ltd. and ors. Vs. State of Haryana and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Other Taxes

Acts : Haryana Local Area Development Tax Act, 2000 - Sections 2(14) and 22; Constitution of India - Articles 145(3), 301 and 304; ;Haryana Municipal Corporation Act, 1994; ;Haryana Municipal Act, 1973; Cantonment Act, 1924; Haryana Panchayati Raj Act, 1994; Central Sales Tax Act, 1956; Rajasthan Motor Vehicles Taxation Act, 1951; Uttar Pradesh Municipalities Act; Assam Taxation (on goods carried by Roads and Inland Waterways) Act, 1954;

Reported in : JT2003(8)SC62; (2004)136PLR601; 2003(8)SCALE122; (2003)8SCC60; [2004]134STC303(SC)

( Haryana Act 24 of 1973), or a Town Board or a Cantonment Board established under the Cantonment Act, 1924 (Central Act 2 of 1924), … ( Haryana Act 24 of 1973), or a Town Board or a Cantonment Board established under the Cantonment Act, 1924 (Central Act 2 of 1924), or a Zila Parishad established under the Haryana Panchayati Raj Act, 1994 ( … of finished goods to other States and do not pay sales tax to the State of Haryana. Under Section 22 of the Haryana Act, The tax collected under this Act shall be distributed by the State Government amongst

Purshottam Das Tandon Dead by Lrs.and anr. Vs. Military Estate Officer ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

that the appellant had also filed an application before the competent authority under Section 181 of the Cantonment Act, 1924 for sanction of plans for raising further additional construction on the land. The said application was rejected on … the order under challenge.3. The suit property is Bungalow No.29, Chaitham Lines, Allahabad covered by Survey No.143, Old Cantonment, Allahabad. There is no dispute that late Lala Manohar Lal grandfather of the present appellant had purchased the … affirmed. The said decree was, in turn, affirmed by this Court on 22.02.1984 by dismissal of the special leave petition filed by the Union of