Advanced Search Results

In Re: the Delhi Laws Act, 1912, the Ajmer-merwara (Extension of Laws) ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 445

Reported in : [1951]2SCR747; AIR 1951 SC 332

authorized the extension of certain chapters to certain areas with modifications. 261. The next instance mentioned was the Cantonments Act, 1924. By section 9 of this Act it was provided, that the Central Government may by notification exclude from … which Congress had allowed or empowered the executive to make regulations or ordinances which may overreach existing statutes. 217. In Moses v. Guaranteed Mortgage Co. of New Yark 239 App. Div. 703 a section of the Emergency

Airports Authority of India Vs. Delhi Cantonment Board

Court : Delhi

Subject : Municipalities

Acts : Cantonments Act, 1924 - Sections 68(1), 103, 69, 71, 64(a)(b), 84; Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957 - Section 126; Constitution of India - Article 226

February 2003 raised by the DCB calling upon AAI to pay Rs. 20,12,06,539/- as house tax under the Cantonments Act, 1924 (CA, 1924) for the period 1st April 1998 to 31st May 2002. 2. On 26th May 2003, this … without any rights therein. 5. It is stated that a notice dated 26th March 2001 was issued under Section 68 (1) of the CA Act, 1924 by the DCB to AAI proposing to increase the rateable value … this Court in Telco v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi 108 (2003) DLT 217. Lastly, it is submitted that in a notice to revise the assessment,

Sukanya Shantha Vs. Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Right to Information

directed the Union government to take “appropriate measures” and “issue directions, to all statutory bodies, including corporations, railways, cantonments, as well as agencies under its control, to ensure that manual sewer cleaning is completely eradicated in a … stated: “There has been a persistent demand in the Central Legislature in recent years that the Criminal Tribes Act, 1924, should be repealed as its provisions which seek to classify particular classes of people as Criminal Tribes, are … proper enquiry award. 94 PART XIII Andhra Pradesh Prison Rules, 1979 ● 217. Definition of habitual - The following persons shall be liable to be … In Shayara Bano v. Union of India,47 in testing the validity of Section 2 of the Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Application Act, 1937 which validates

State of Rajasthan and ors. Vs. Union of India and ors. Overruled

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : ConstitutionCriminal

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 12, 19, 19(1), 21, 22, 32, 73(1), 74(2), 142(1), 123, 153, 154, 155, 156, 163, 168, 169, 172, 172(1), 174(1), 174(2), 213, 248, 250, 256, 257, 257(1), 291, 352, 352(3), 353, 354, 356, 356(1), 356(3), 356(5), 365, 367 and 368; Government of India Act, 1935 - Sections 72, 93, 204 and 204(2); Internal Security (Amendment) Act, 1976; General Clause Act, 1897 - Sections 3(58) and 3(60); Representation of People Act, 1951 - Sections 14(2) and 30

Reported in : AIR1977SC1361; (1977)3SCC592; [1978]1SCR1

two conditions Dicey postulated for the existence of federalism were: firstly, 'a body of countries such as the Cantons of Switzerland, the Colonies of America, or the Provinces of Canada, so closely connected by locality, by history, … circumtances stated in the letter addressed by the defendant to the plaint(sic) Chief Minister and the resultant threatened action under Article (sic) of the Constitution are wholly unconstitutional and mala fide and that proclamation issued on the … King-Emperor, 50 I.A. 169, where the Privy Council interpreted the pro-visions of Section 72 of the Government of India Act, which authorised the Governor-General in

Railway Express Agency, Inc. Vs. Virginia

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

Galveston, H. & San Antonio R. Co. v. Texas, 210 U. S. 217 , 210 U. S. 227 (1908). One must comprehend, however, the difference … Court's decisions sustain the application of a fairly apportioned general gross receipts tax to an interstate transportation company. Canton R. Co. v. Rogan, 340 U. S. 511 , 340 U. S. 515 -516; Central Greyhound Lines, Inc. … ] Railway Express Agency v. Virginia, 347 U. S. 359 (1954). Subsequently, the Virginia General Assembly enacted the Act here involved, levying a "franchise tax" on express companies, measured by gross receipts from operations within Virginia, in … property tax, and in fact the rate, as established by the latter section, has been used before the "in lieu" provision as a basis for