Advanced Search Results

T. Parathasarathy and ors. Vs. Smt. Madhu Sangal

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Cantonments Act, 1924 - Sections 179, 181, 181(4), 181(5), 181(6), 185, 187, 254, 256, 259 and 272; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 3(22); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 39, Rule 2A; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 190, 200 to 205, 209 and 482; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 52, 149, 294, 341, 352, 392, 427, 448, 451 and 452

Reported in : 1992CriLJ26

Acts/Rules/Orders: Cantonments Act, 1924 - Sections 179, 181, 181(4), 181(5), 181(6), 185, 187, 254, 256, 259 and 272; General Clauses Act, 1897 … 202, there is in his judgment 'no sufficient ground for proceeding'. The words 'sufficient ground' used also in Section 209 have been construed to mean the satisfaction that a prima facie case is made out against the person

Sukanya Shantha Vs. Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Right to Information

directed the Union government to take “appropriate measures” and “issue directions, to all statutory bodies, including corporations, railways, cantonments, as well as agencies under its control, to ensure that manual sewer cleaning is completely eradicated in a … stated: “There has been a persistent demand in the Central Legislature in recent years that the Criminal Tribes Act, 1924, should be repealed as its provisions which seek to classify particular classes of people as Criminal Tribes, are … Penal Code and is opposed also to Article 23 of the Constitution.”212 209 Ibid 210 Ibid 211 Ibid, p. 82 212 Ibid, p. 82 76 … In Shayara Bano v. Union of India,47 in testing the validity of Section 2 of the Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Application Act, 1937 which validates

State of Rajasthan and ors. Vs. Union of India and ors. Overruled

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : ConstitutionCriminal

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 12, 19, 19(1), 21, 22, 32, 73(1), 74(2), 142(1), 123, 153, 154, 155, 156, 163, 168, 169, 172, 172(1), 174(1), 174(2), 213, 248, 250, 256, 257, 257(1), 291, 352, 352(3), 353, 354, 356, 356(1), 356(3), 356(5), 365, 367 and 368; Government of India Act, 1935 - Sections 72, 93, 204 and 204(2); Internal Security (Amendment) Act, 1976; General Clause Act, 1897 - Sections 3(58) and 3(60); Representation of People Act, 1951 - Sections 14(2) and 30

Reported in : AIR1977SC1361; (1977)3SCC592; [1978]1SCR1

two conditions Dicey postulated for the existence of federalism were: firstly, 'a body of countries such as the Cantons of Switzerland, the Colonies of America, or the Provinces of Canada, so closely connected by locality, by history, … circumtances stated in the letter addressed by the defendant to the plaint(sic) Chief Minister and the resultant threatened action under Article (sic) of the Constitution are wholly unconstitutional and mala fide and that proclamation issued on the … King-Emperor, 50 I.A. 169, where the Privy Council interpreted the pro-visions of Section 72 of the Government of India Act, which authorised the Governor-General in