Advanced Search Results

Zila Parishad (District Board) Vs. Smt. Shanti Devi and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : ContractLimitation

Acts : Uttar Pradesh District Boards Act, 1922 - Sections 192, 192(1) and 192(3); Uttar Pradesh General Clauses Act, 1904 - Sections 4(2); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 20 - Order 2, Rule 2 - Order 6, Rule 3; Limitation Act, 1908 - Schedule - Articles 56 and 120

Reported in : AIR1965All590

Act are an exact copy of theprovisions of section 326 of the Municipalities Act. Section 273 of the Cantonments Act, 1924, lays downthat '(1) No suit shall be instituted against any Board ...... in respect of any act done, … C., and the words 'done or purporting to have been done in pursuance of the Act1, occurring in Section 208 of the Bombay Municipalities Act. In Bradford Corporation v. Myers (1916) 1 A C 242 the House of

V. Ratna Mudaliar (Died) and ors. Vs. the Cantonment Board of St. Thom ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Commercial

Reported in : (1958)1MLJ349

of his is sound. Section 203 of the Cantonment Act (II of 1924) empowers a Cantonment Board to charge licence fees to open a private … first licence was granted and the market began first to function. Sections 208 and 280 of the Act empower the Board and the Central Government … Private Market under a sale-deed, dated 9th October, 1930. This property is situate within the limits of the Cantonment of St. Thomas Mount. By arrangement with his brothers the petitioner has been managing this market. Year after … for opening a market. The second is that in asking for the enhanced licence fees the Cantonment Board acted in excess of its powers and converted the licence-fee into a source of revenue which it is not

Sukanya Shantha Vs. Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Right to Information

directed the Union government to take “appropriate measures” and “issue directions, to all statutory bodies, including corporations, railways, cantonments, as well as agencies under its control, to ensure that manual sewer cleaning is completely eradicated in a … stated: “There has been a persistent demand in the Central Legislature in recent years that the Criminal Tribes Act, 1924, should be repealed as its provisions which seek to classify particular classes of people as Criminal Tribes, are … for setting 205 ibid 206 Ibid, p. 8 207 Ibid, p. 1 208 Ibid, p. 81 75 PART XI them free by repealing the Act … In Shayara Bano v. Union of India,47 in testing the validity of Section 2 of the Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Application Act, 1937 which validates

State of Rajasthan and ors. Vs. Union of India and ors. Overruled

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : ConstitutionCriminal

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 12, 19, 19(1), 21, 22, 32, 73(1), 74(2), 142(1), 123, 153, 154, 155, 156, 163, 168, 169, 172, 172(1), 174(1), 174(2), 213, 248, 250, 256, 257, 257(1), 291, 352, 352(3), 353, 354, 356, 356(1), 356(3), 356(5), 365, 367 and 368; Government of India Act, 1935 - Sections 72, 93, 204 and 204(2); Internal Security (Amendment) Act, 1976; General Clause Act, 1897 - Sections 3(58) and 3(60); Representation of People Act, 1951 - Sections 14(2) and 30

Reported in : AIR1977SC1361; (1977)3SCC592; [1978]1SCR1

two conditions Dicey postulated for the existence of federalism were: firstly, 'a body of countries such as the Cantons of Switzerland, the Colonies of America, or the Provinces of Canada, so closely connected by locality, by history, … circumtances stated in the letter addressed by the defendant to the plaint(sic) Chief Minister and the resultant threatened action under Article (sic) of the Constitution are wholly unconstitutional and mala fide and that proclamation issued on the … King-Emperor, 50 I.A. 169, where the Privy Council interpreted the pro-visions of Section 72 of the Government of India Act, which authorised the Governor-General in