Advanced Search Results

Chief Executive Officer, Cantonment Board Vs. Tenzing Gopu Lama and Et ...

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Criminal

respectively.4. The complaints were filed by the Cantonment Board through its Estate Officer under Section 184 of the Cantonments Act, 1924 alleging illegal constructions on the land belonging to the Cantonment Board without due permission. Since the Offences were … Magistrate again with a second complaint on the same facts. But if the dismissal of the complaint under Section 203 of the Code was on merits the position could be different. There appeared a difference of opinion earlier

V. Ratna Mudaliar (Died) and ors. Vs. the Cantonment Board of St. Thom ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Commercial

Reported in : (1958)1MLJ349

cannot charge any fees for the renewal of the licence. I think this contention of his is sound. Section 203 of the Cantonment Act (II of 1924) empowers a Cantonment Board to charge licence fees to open a … Private Market under a sale-deed, dated 9th October, 1930. This property is situate within the limits of the Cantonment of St. Thomas Mount. By arrangement with his brothers the petitioner has been managing this market. Year after

Smt. Husenbi SadroddIn Shaiakh Vs. Cantonment Board, by Its Executive ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Cantonments Act, 1924 - Sections 179, 179(2) and 256; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 100

Reported in : AIR2003Kant281; ILR2003KAR1935; 2003(4)KarLJ241

defendant - Board restraining the Board from acting upon the notice issued by it under Section 256 of Cantonments Act, 1924 ('the Act' for short) on the ground that the Board was not entitled to initiate action under Section … calls in question the judgment and decree of the 1st Addl. Civil Judge (Sr.Dn.) at Belgaum in RA.No. 203/1996 affirming the judgment and decree dated 4.11.1996 passed by the Prl.Munsiff at Belgaum in O.S.No. 56/1994 dismissing the

P.K. Narayanan and anr. Etc. Vs. State of Kerala and ors.

Court : Kerala

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Central Government Account Receipts and Payment Rules - Rules 70, 79 and 79(1); Kerala Panchayats Act, 1960 - Sections 69A

Reported in : AIR1992Ker148

can mean only this is India a permanent military station. The definition of this word 'cantonment' in the Cantonments Act, 1924 (Central Act 2/1924) may also be considered in this context with profit. It reads:--'The Central Government may, by … the statute to be construed. In Howard v. Badington, (1877) 2 PD 203, Lord Penzance said that in each case the court should look into … 79(1) of the Central Government Account Receipts and Payments Rules, for short, The Central Rules and not under Section 69A of The Kerala Panchayat Act, 1960, for short, The Panchayat Act, introduced by the Local Authorities (Amendment)

T. Parathasarathy and ors. Vs. Smt. Madhu Sangal

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Cantonments Act, 1924 - Sections 179, 181, 181(4), 181(5), 181(6), 185, 187, 254, 256, 259 and 272; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 3(22); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 39, Rule 2A; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 190, 200 to 205, 209 and 482; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 52, 149, 294, 341, 352, 392, 427, 448, 451 and 452

Reported in : 1992CriLJ26

Acts/Rules/Orders: Cantonments Act, 1924 - Sections 179, 181, 181(4), 181(5), 181(6), 185, 187, 254, 256, 259 and 272; General Clauses Act, 1897 … by a Magistrate subordinate to him or by a police officer for ascertaining its truth or falsehood. Under Section 203, he may dismiss the complaint, if, after taking the statement of the complainant and his witnesses and the

Vimar Seguros Y Reaseguros, S. A. Vs. M/V Sky Reefer

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : MRTP

provisions to that effect in their domestic versions of the Hague Rules, see, e. g., Sea-Carriage of Goods Act 1924, § 9(2) (Australia); Carriage of Goods by Sea Act, No. 1 of 1986, § 3 (South Africa). In … than if cargo [owners] could sue in a convenient forum." Id., at 203 (citation omitted). The court observed "there could be no assurance that [the … of Appeals without exception have invalidated foreign forum selection clauses under § 3(8). See Union Ins. Soc. of Canton, Ltd. v. S. S. Elikon, 642 F.2d 721 , 723-725 (CA4 1981); Conklin & Garrett, Ltd v. MN … "aris[e] from ... failure in the duties or obligations provided in this section," § 3(8) is concerned with the liability imposed elsewhere in § 3,

Sukanya Shantha Vs. Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Right to Information

directed the Union government to take “appropriate measures” and “issue directions, to all statutory bodies, including corporations, railways, cantonments, as well as agencies under its control, to ensure that manual sewer cleaning is completely eradicated in a … stated: “There has been a persistent demand in the Central Legislature in recent years that the Criminal Tribes Act, 1924, should be repealed as its provisions which seek to classify particular classes of people as Criminal Tribes, are … concurrent jurisdiction on this issue, they could amend or repeal the Act 203 Marc Galanter, “Untouchability and the Law”, Economic and Political Weekly (1969), Vol. … In Shayara Bano v. Union of India,47 in testing the validity of Section 2 of the Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Application Act, 1937 which validates

State of Rajasthan and ors. Vs. Union of India and ors. Overruled

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : ConstitutionCriminal

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 12, 19, 19(1), 21, 22, 32, 73(1), 74(2), 142(1), 123, 153, 154, 155, 156, 163, 168, 169, 172, 172(1), 174(1), 174(2), 213, 248, 250, 256, 257, 257(1), 291, 352, 352(3), 353, 354, 356, 356(1), 356(3), 356(5), 365, 367 and 368; Government of India Act, 1935 - Sections 72, 93, 204 and 204(2); Internal Security (Amendment) Act, 1976; General Clause Act, 1897 - Sections 3(58) and 3(60); Representation of People Act, 1951 - Sections 14(2) and 30

Reported in : AIR1977SC1361; (1977)3SCC592; [1978]1SCR1

two conditions Dicey postulated for the existence of federalism were: firstly, 'a body of countries such as the Cantons of Switzerland, the Colonies of America, or the Provinces of Canada, so closely connected by locality, by history, … circumtances stated in the letter addressed by the defendant to the plaint(sic) Chief Minister and the resultant threatened action under Article (sic) of the Constitution are wholly unconstitutional and mala fide and that proclamation issued on the … King-Emperor, 50 I.A. 169, where the Privy Council interpreted the pro-visions of Section 72 of the Government of India Act, which authorised the Governor-General in

Sheo Pratap Singh and ors. Vs. Emperor

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : AIR1930All820

District Magistrate.10. I may also refer to Sarju Prasad v. Emperor A.I.R. 1924 All. 190, in which there was the report of a Magistrate to … and may either make an enquiry himself, or direct an enquiry or investigation, or dismiss the complaint under Section 203, Criminal P.C., after recording his reasons. But in the case of receiving information, the Magistrate is not asked … in 1913, reported in Makhan Singh v. Gunner Jepson [1914] 15 Cr. L.J. 261. In that case the Cantonment Magistrate wrote a letter to an Assistant Commissioner suggesting that a person should be proceeded against for using … the case tried by another Court.2. This argument assumes chat the Magistrate acted under Section 190(1)(c). The record shows that the Magistrate issued process on

ChaIn Singh Vs. Shri Mata Vaishno Devi Shrine Board and ors

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Subject : Land Acquisition

Zamindary Company limited vs. Kumar Naresh Narayan Roy & others, reported as 1924 Privy Council 144 (at page 147).20. The Boards learned counsels plea that … the premises, which was otherwise, in law, impermissible.17. The view taken by this Court in Beant Singh v. Cantonment Executive Officer, Jammu, reported as AIR 196.Jammu and Kashmir, 83 reads thus: The learned counsel for the appellant … Devi Dharmarth Trust at annual rent of Rs. 15,000/-. After the Jammu and Kashmir Mata Vaishno Devi Shrine Act, 1986 (Governors Act, later replaced by the Act of legislature in 1988), the petitioner claimed to have become … observations referred to above were in connection with a Suit filed under Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 or analogous provisions in the … Singh v. Rao Jagdish Singh, (1968) 2 SCR 203.This Court in that judgment cited with approval the