Advanced Search Results
Estate Officer, Cantonment Board Vs. Rup Ram S/O Mohan Lal and anr.
Mumbai
Jul-25-1990
Civil
Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971 - Sections 2 and 7; Cantonments Act, 1924 - Sections 3, 11, 45, 46, 51A, 53, 54, 63A, 99A and 108 to 111; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 3(31); Hyderabad Rent Control Act - Sections 31; Major Port Trust Act; Cantonments (Extension of Rent Control Laws) Act, 1957
1991(1)BomCR363
Board, situated withing the limits of Aurangabad Cantonment, which is a defined cantonment under section 3 of the Cantonments Act, 1924. Respondent No.1-Rup Ram is an officer in the Defence Services, Government of India, and has been in occupation … jurisdiction. He took the view that since the Cantonments Board is a local authority within the meaning of section 2(e), the provision of the said Act were not applicable to the premises by virtue of the provisions contained
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJagat Singh S/O Late Chaudhary Badri Singh Vs. the Estate Officer, Del ...
Delhi
May-09-2002
PropertyConstitution
Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorized Occupants) Act, 1971 - Sections 2, 2(1), 2(2), 3, 3(1), 4(1), 5A, 5A(1), 5A(2), 5B, 5C and 9; Wealth Tax Act, 1957; Cantonments Act, 1924 - Sections 10, 108, 178A, 184 and 185; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Cantonment Land Administration Rules, 1937; Cantonment Property Rules, 1925; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 3; Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorized Occupants) (Amendment) Act, 1980
2002VAD(Delhi)713; 98(2002)DLT151; 2002(63)DRJ756
as defined in Section 2(e) of the Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorized Occupants) Act, 1971 read with the Cantonments Act, 1924 is the subject of decision in this case.Facts 2. The Petitioner is said to be in unauthorized occupation
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCantonment Board of Deolali Vs. Mrs. Usha Devidas Dongre and anr.
Mumbai
Nov-04-1992
Civil
Constitution of India - Article 254(2); General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 3(31); Cantonments Act, 1924 - Sections 3(1); Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1977 - Sections 2(20), 9(2) and 9(3)
1993(2)BomCR281
cantonments are constituted by the Central Government in accordance with the powers conferred under section 3(1) of the Cantonments Act, 1924. The Central Government is authorised to declare any place or places in which any part of the defence … M.L. Pendse, J.1. By this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution Cantonment Board of Deolali, District Nasik is challenging legality of order dated 21st January 1987
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Municipal Corporation for City of Pune and Another Vs. Bharat Forge Co ...
Supreme Court of India
Mar-10-1995
Other Taxes
Cantonments Act, 1880 - Sections 21, 22; Cantonments Act, 1924 - Sections 45(1), 60 to 63 and 81(2) and 255; General Clauses Act - Sections 21; Constitution of India - Articles 21, 226 and 265; Bombay Municipal Act, 1872; Bombay District Municipal Act, 1873; Cantonments Act, 1910; Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporations Act, 1949 - Sections 32(4); Limitation Act, 1623; Sex Disqualification Act, 1919; Statute Law (Repeals) Act, 1906; Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 - Sections 8(2); Cantonment (Extention of Rent Control Laws) Act, 1957 - Sections 3
AIR1996SC2856; JT1995(3)SC312; 1995(2)SCALE245; (1995)3SCC434a; [1995]2SCR716; (1995)2UPLBEC740; (1995) 3 SCC 434
Notification relating to assessment, collection and recovery of octroi duties.8. After the aforesaid Notifications had been issued, the Cantonments Act, 1924 was enacted. Chapter V of this Act is on the subject of 'Taxation'; and Sections 60 to 63 … started levy and recovery of octroi form 1875-76. The Cantonments Act, 1880 was enacted on 5th February, 1980. Section 21 of this Act permitted imposition by the Local Government, with the previous sanction of the Governor-General in … done by approaching the Bombay High Court by filing petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution which have come to be allowed by the impugned
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRamgarh Cantonment Board and anr. Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.
Supreme Court of India
Mar-11-2008
Other Taxes
Cantonments Act, 1924 - Sections 60 and 60(1); Bihar and Orissa Municipal Act, 1922 - Sections 3(30), 3(30A), 82, 137, 138, 150, 326 and 356; Madhya Pradesh Municipalities Act, 1961 - Sections 127 and 127(1); Madhya Pradesh Motor Vehicles Taxation Act - Sections 3(2)
JT2008(3)SC590; 2008(4)SCALE162; (2008)11SCC223; (2008)15VST550(SC); 2008AIRSCW2223
or authority to levy tax on entry of mechanically propelled vehicles, the Cantonment Board cannot exercise those powers. CANTONMENTS ACT, 1924. Section 60 & Bihar & Orissa Municipal Act (7 of 1922), Sections 82 & 137: [Ashok Bhan &Dalveer Bhandari, … Dalveer Bhandari, J.1. This appeal is directed against the judgment passed in Letters Patent Appeal No. 556 of 2001 dated 4th October, 2001 delivered by the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi.2. The central question which arises
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Western India theatres Ltd. Vs. the Cantonment Board, Poona, Canto ...
Supreme Court of India
Jan-16-1959
Other Taxes
Indian Companies Act, 1913; Cantonments Act, 1924 - Sections 60; Bombay Municipal Boroughs Act, 1925 - Sections 73, 75 and 76; Bombay Motor Vehicles Tax Act, 1935 - Sections 14; Government of India Act, 1935 - Sections 100 and 142A; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 276(2)
AIR1959SC582; [1959]Supp(2)SCR63
issued by the respondent whereby, in exercise of the powers conferred on it by s. 60 of the Cantonments Act, 1924 (II of 1924), the respondent proposed to make, with the previous sanction of the Central Government, certain amendments … all times material to this appeal the respondent was governed by the Cantonments Act, 1924 (Act II of 1924). Section 60 of that Act runs as follows :- '60(1) The Board may, with the previous sanction of the … under a certificate of fitness granted by the High Court of Bombay. 2. The facts leading up to this appeal may shortly be stated. The
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskUsman Gani J. Khatri of Bombay and ors. Vs. Cantonment Board and Other ...
Supreme Court of India
May-01-1992
Property
Cantonments Act, 1924 - Sections 43A, 179, 181(6), 186, 274 and 283; Cantonment Land Administration Rules, 1937 - Rule 2
AIR1994SC233; JT1992(4)SC538; 1992(1)SCALE1068; (1992)3SCC455; [1992]3SCR1; 1992(2)LC441(SC)
No. 30 dated nil month April, 1981 resolved that the plans be sanctioned under Section 181 of the Cantonments Act, 1924 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') subject to AHO's No Objection. It was clearly mentioned in the aforesaid … 19.11.1980. The Cantonment Board Pune - the respondent No. 1 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Cantonment Board') on 2.12.1980 passed a resolution suggesting the set backs and recommended that the area admeasuring about 10633 sq. feet be
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Cantonment Board, Ambala Vs. Pyarelal
Supreme Court of India
Mar-12-1965
Tenancy
Cantonments Act, 1924 - Sections 259 and 259(2); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 435 and 439; Constitution of India - Article 227; Cantonments (Amendment) Act, 1954; Cantonment Property Rules, 1925 - Rule 8; Cantonment Land Administration Rules 1937 - Rules 4, 8, 9(6), 26, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 34, 37, 41 and 42
AIR1966SC108; 1966CriLJ93; [1965]3SCR341
the majority the appeal is dismissed. Tenancy - realization of rent - Sections 259 and 259 (2) of Cantonments Act, 1924, Sections 435 and 439 of Code of Criminal Procedure, Article 227 of Constitution of India, Cantonments (Amendment) Act, … become due to the date of their realisation, shall, on the application of the person specified in sub- section (2) of section 259 of the Act, or of the Military Estates Officers, as the case may be, recoverable
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskLt. Col. Narendra Kumar Kakkar (Retd.) Vs. Nissar Khan Ibrahim Khan an ...
Mumbai
Jul-20-1988
CivilConstitution
Cantonments Act, 1924 - Sections 28(2); Constitution of India - Article 226
1988(4)BomCR475; 1989MhLJ38
of the Board since he had incurred prior to the election a disqualification under section 28(2)(h) of the Cantonments Act, 1924 (hereinafter called 'the said Act'). The alleged disqualification is on the ground that the first respondent had failed
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAgricultural Produce Market Committee, Narela, Delhi Vs. Commissioner ...
Supreme Court of India
Aug-21-2008
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2(1), 10, 10(20), 10(26AAB) and 260A; Finance Act, 2002; Cantonments Act, 1924 - Sections 3; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 3(31); Delhi Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation) Act, 1998 - Sections 5, 22(1), 22(2), 62 65, 88, 88(1), 88(2) and 88(3); Delhi Development Act, 1957; Payment of Bonus Act, 1965 - Sections 32; Constitution of India (Seventy-third Amendment) Act, 1992; Constitution of India (Seventy-fourth Amendment) Act, 1992; Constitution of India - Articles 243, 243P, 243 and 243ZF
(2008)218CTR(SC)433; [2008]305ITR1(SC); JT2008(10)SC17; 2008(11)SCALE540; (2008)9SCC434; 2008AIRSCW6285; 2008(6)Supreme520; 2008(11)SCALE540
management of a Municipal or local fund; or (iv) Cantonment Board as defined in Section 3 of the Cantonments Act, 1924 (2 of 1924);12. Mr. M.L. Verma, learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of the appellants, submitted that AMC(s)
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »