Advanced Search Results

Pune Cantonment Board and Another Vs. M.P.J. Builders and Another

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Property

Acts : Cantonments Act, 1924 - Sections 52(1), 180-A, 181-A and 183-A; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 1996VIAD(SC)102; AIR1996SC2645; (1990)3CompLJ362(SC); JT1996(7)SC123; 1996(5)SCALE713; (1996)5SCC438; [1996]Supp4SCR512

House No. 2, Sholapur Bazar Road, Pune, which falls within the area of Pune Cantonment governed by the Cantonments Act, 1924 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act').2. The respondent No. 1 was granted a building sanction under Section 181 … by Executive Officer. - The powers, duties and functions of the Board under Section 181, Sub-section (1) of Section 182, Section 183, Section 183-A and Section 185 (excluding the proviso to Sub-section (1) and the proviso to Sub-section

Kishanlal Agarwala and anr. Vs. State of Assam and anr.

Court : Guwahati

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Assam Panchayati Raj Act, 1973 - Sections 1 and 158; Assam Land and Revenue Regulations, 1886 - Rule 18(2) and 18(3)

area which has been or hereafter may be included in a municipality or a town committee or a cantonment as constituted under the Assam Municipal Act, 1956 (Assam Act XV of 1957) and Cantonment Act 1924 (Act … or a cantonment as constituted under the Assam Municipal Act, 1956 (Assam Act XV of 1957) and Cantonment Act 1924 (Act II of 1924) respectively or by any other Act.'The Assam Panchayati Raj Act, 1973 came into force … petitioner and the said other person protested and in a proceeding under Section 145 Cr. p. C. (MR Case No. 36 of 1973), the Chief

Vyara Agricultural Produce Market Committee, Vyara Vs. Vyara Nagar Pan ...

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Other Taxes

Acts : Gujarat Gram and Nagar Panchayats Taxes and Fees Rules, 1964 - Rules 2 and 7(2); Bombay General Clauses Act, 1904 - Sections 3(26); Gujarat Agricultural Produce Markets Act, 1964 - Sections 10(2); Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227

Reported in : AIR1985Guj204; (1985)1GLR355

of the State of Gujarat, or (v) any other corresponding law. (3) a Cantonment Board constituted under the Cantonments Act, 1924 (11 of 1924); (4) A Taluka Panchayat or a district panchayat constituted under the Gujarat Panchayats Act, 1961 … meaning should be given to the word 'local authority' as defined under S. 3(26), Bombay General Clauses' Act.6. Section 10(2), Gujarat Agricultural Produce Markets Act, in terms states that a market committee shall be deemed to be … by the Additional Commissioner, Gujarat State, Gandhinagar, in Revision Application N o. 182/77 under S. 305 Gujarat Panchayats Act, 1961, holding that the petitioner is

Nur Mahomed Beg Mahomed Vs. G. Monteath

Court : Mumbai

Subject : PropertyCivil

Reported in : (1925)27BOMLR56

with is one of 1923 and accordingly was passed by what may be styled Popular Assemblies. Similarly the Cantonments Act now regulating the cantonments generally is not an old Act, but is a recent Act.8. Turning then to … common ground that he actually lived in the house for a day or two in April and May, 1924, and it was alleged by the plaintiff that extensive repairs to the hense had been made by him … A. C. 179 and the observations there of Lord Loreburn at p. 182; and Local Government Board v. Arlidge [1915] A. C. 120, where Lord … that the cantonment authorities had no jurisdiction to issue a notice under Section 7 of the Act, requiring him to vacate and to execute a

Chandan Lal Joura Vs. AmIn Chand Mohan Lal and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Negotiable Instruments Act - Sections 118; Evidence Act -Sections 114; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 11, Rules 18 and 21 - Order 17, Rule 3

Reported in : AIR1960P& H500

1915: (AIR 1915 Lah 439); and Karam Chand v. Jinda Ram, AIR 1924 Lah 404.(30) The provisions of O. 17, R. 3, Civil Procedure Code, … vide Narayana Rajasthan v. Venkatapayya. AIR 1937 Mad 182 (187); Muhammad Shafi Khan v. Muhammad Moazzam Ali … defendant No. 3 had revealed the following information. The defendant-firm used to supply to the military at Jullundur Cantonment certain articles on the basis of tender contracts entered into with 'C. R. I. A. S. C.,' Jullundur … of the firm on 13th of May, 1949, as alleged; and(b) whether a sum of Rs. 25,000/- was actually paid to defendant No. 2 or whether the pronote was passed by way of an illegal gratification for … the defendants to rebut the presumption that the pronote was for consideration. Section 118(a) is as under:'Until the contrary is proved, the following presumption shall

Nur Mahomed Beg Mahomed Vs. G. Monteath District Magistrate

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Reported in : AIR1925Bom162; (1925)ILR49Bom152

dealing with is one of 1923 and accordingly was passed by-what may be styled Popular Assemblies. Similarly the Cantonments Act now regulating the Cantonments; generally is not an old Act, but is a recent Act.8. Turning then to … common ground that he actually lived in the house for a day or two in April and May 1924, and it was alleged by the plaintiff that extensive repairs to the house had been made by him … [1911] A.C. 179 and the observations there of Lord Loreburn at p. 182; and Local Government Board v. Arlidge [1915] A.C. 120 where Lord Haldane … that the Cantonment authorities had no jurisdiction to issue a notice under Section 7 of the Act. requiring him to vacate and to execute a

Bhagwanti and ors. Vs. Shiv Dei and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Property

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 100; Punjab Preemption Act, 1913 - Sections 15

Reported in : ILR1977Delhi761

called a village immovable property. In Diwan Chand v. Nizam Din, Air 1924 Lah 662, the village was held to connote ordinarily an area occupied … Sheikh Abdul Rahman v. Khan Sahib Haji Rashid Ahmed Air 1937 Lah 182 , the Division Bench of the High Court after considering a number … notification No. 677 issued by the Lt. Governor on 10th November, 1908, has declared the Delhi City and Cantonment as well as Najafgarh and Mehrauli to be towns. No such notification in respect of New Delhi or … rise to this appeal, for pre-empting the same under clause (a) of section 15 of the Punjab Pre-emption Act, 1 of 1913, as it stood amended prior to 1960 (hereinafter referred to as the Act), in her

Timken Roller Bearing Co. Vs. Pennsylvania R. Co.

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : MRTP

filed in the Common Pleas Court of Cuyahoga County on May 31, 1924, and was removed to the United States District Court for the Northern … of the district court Page 274 U. S. 182 where diversity of citizenship and jurisdictional amount are … in the business of making roller bearings and other steel products, with its principal place of business in Canton, Stark County, Ohio. The Pennsylvania Railroad is a corporation of Pennsylvania, and a common carrier engaged in Ohio, … ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO Syllabus 1. An action against a railroad for the value of switching service performed by a shipper who did so at the … which it is so transferred." There is no doubt that, under this section, if it applies to the present case, the motion to dismiss should

Railway Express Agency, Inc. Vs. Virginia

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

Backus, 154 U. S. 421 ; Branson v. Bush, 251 U. S. 182 . See 2 Cooley on Taxation, pp. 1660-1664. Its asserted inapplicability to … Court's decisions sustain the application of a fairly apportioned general gross receipts tax to an interstate transportation company. Canton R. Co. v. Rogan, 340 U. S. 511 , 340 U. S. 515 -516; Central Greyhound Lines, Inc. … ] Railway Express Agency v. Virginia, 347 U. S. 359 (1954). Subsequently, the Virginia General Assembly enacted the Act here involved, levying a "franchise tax" on express companies, measured by gross receipts from operations within Virginia, in … property tax, and in fact the rate, as established by the latter section, has been used before the "in lieu" provision as a basis for

Hira Lal Ghosh Vs. Emperor

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : 83Ind.Cas.905

and directs the prisoners be discharged. We also direct the Sessions Judge to call the attention of the Cantonment Magistrate to the provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure which relate to the examination of witnesses and … been disregarded, and the relation of that provision to the general object intended to be secured by the Act; and upon a review of the case in that aspect decide whether the matter is what is called … whether an omission by a Court to comply with the provisions of Section 360, Criminal Procedure Code, vitiates the trial. The provisions of the section