Advanced Search Results

Jagat Singh S/O Late Chaudhary Badri Singh Vs. the Estate Officer, Del ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : PropertyConstitution

Acts : Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorized Occupants) Act, 1971 - Sections 2, 2(1), 2(2), 3, 3(1), 4(1), 5A, 5A(1), 5A(2), 5B, 5C and 9; Wealth Tax Act, 1957; Cantonments Act, 1924 - Sections 10, 108, 178A, 184 and 185; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Cantonment Land Administration Rules, 1937; Cantonment Property Rules, 1925; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 3; Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorized Occupants) (Amendment) Act, 1980

Reported in : 2002VAD(Delhi)713; 98(2002)DLT151; 2002(63)DRJ756

as defined in Section 2(e) of the Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorized Occupants) Act, 1971 read with the Cantonments Act, 1924 is the subject of decision in this case.Facts 2. The Petitioner is said to be in unauthorized occupation … true. Chapter XI of the Cantonments Act concerns itself with the 'Control over Buildings, Streets, Boundaries, Trees, etc.' Section 178A thereof prohibits the erection of any building in a civil area in a cantonment, except with the previous

The Jullundur Cantonment Board Vs. Firm Hindu Khandan Mushtarka Munshi ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Civil

Acts : Cantonments Act, 1924 - Sections 43A, 44, 198, 210, 253 and 272; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 9; Cantonments Regulations - Regulations 42A and 55(1)

Reported in : AIR1976P& H265

paragraph (1) above. ***** 55 (1) The Civil Area Committee shall deal with all matters mentioned in Sections 178A, 179 to 185 and 210 of the Cantonments Act, 1924, and the decisions of the Committee thereon shall … Board resisted the suit with the plea that by virtue of the provisions of Section 272 of the Cantonments Act, 1924, hereinafter referred to as the Act, no suit could be filed against the Board. Regarding the impugned notices

P.S. Gill and ors. Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Property

Acts : Delhi Development Act, 1957 - Sections 12

Reported in : ILR1978Delhi515

May 2, 1942. issued in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-s. (3) of s. 4 of the Cantonments Act 1924 t!'e Central Government included the petitioners, land wifhin the limits or the Delhi Cantonment. The petitioners' case is … cannot disregard it. Cantonment Act has elaborate provisions in Ch. Xi (sections 178A to 197) for control over buildings and land in the Cantonment. What … open to the Central Government to make alterations in the Master Plan as envisaged by subsection (2) of section 11-A of the Development Act. It need hardly be said that the housing activity beneficial to the population

Dr. Rajesh Kapoor vs.delhi Cantonment Board and Anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Copy of the JE’s report has been annexed as Annexure A8. to j. Notice u/s 185 of the Cantonments Act, 1924 was issued the... Petitioner on 15.03.2004 and 16.06.2004 against which he has preferred appeal before the competent authority. … building plans and obtaining sanction of the competent authority as required u/s 178A/179 of Cantonment Act, 1924 on the site earmarked as green land in … It was the submission of Mr. Vikas Dhawan, learned counsel for the petitioner that the impugned order under section 249(1) of the Act is in violation of the principle of natural justice, inasmuch as the petitioner has

Vishwanath Goyal (Deceased by Lrs.) and ors. Vs. Cantonment Board, Agr ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Cantonment Act, 1924 - Sections 43A, 179, 180, 181(3), 181(6), 185, 185(1), 256 and 278 ; Cantonment (Amendment) Act, 1954; Cantonment Land Administration Rules, 1937 - Rule 9(5); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 9; Cantonment (Amendment) Act, 1983

Reported in : AIR1987All4

Vishwanath Goyal applied to the Cantonment Board for sanction by giving notice required under Section 179 of the Cantonments Act, 1924 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) on July 14, 1958. A written communication was sent by him thereafter … and of the rules and bye-laws made under the Act relating to the erection and re-erection of buildings. (Section 178A). A person intending to erect or re-erect any building in a Cantonment has to apply for sanction in

S.L.Seth Vs. Union of India

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Land Acquisition

application was submitted by the petitioners in five separate forms under the provisions of Section 179 of the Cantonments Act, 1924 (herein after referred to as '1924 Act'). Since the land is situated outside the notified civil area of