Advanced Search Results

P. Gyan Chander Vs. Secunderabad Cantonment Board and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Property

Acts : Cantonments Act, 1924 - Sections 179, 282 and 283

Reported in : 2003(6)ALD65

the Supreme Court in Poonam v. Municipal Coporation of Delhi, 2000 (5) Supreme 363.6. Section 179 of the Cantonments Act, 1924 (for short, the Act) requires every person who intended to erect or re-erect any building in a cantonment … Rao, J.1. The petitioner claims that he allegedly purchased plot No. 17, admeasuring 232 Sq. yards in S.No. 157/9 (New S.No. 157/ 10) situated at Thokatta Village, Secunderabad, by registered sale deed dated 16.8.1982. According to the

Gangaram Vs. the Municipal Counsel, Nagar Palika, Neemuch and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 116; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 108; Madhya Pradesh Municipalities Act, 1961 - Sections 2 and 164(1); Madhya Bharat Municipalities Act, 1954 - Sections 94

Reported in : AIR1992MP303; 1993(0)MPLJ550

1966 SC 108 : (1966 Cri LJ 93) held in the context of Section 259(1) of the Cantonment Act, 1924, as amended by Act No. 2 of 1954 that action for recovery could be taken under S, 259 … be recoverable in the manner provided by this Chapter; or(b) Which, not being leviable under subsection (1) of Section 157 or payable on demand on account of an octroi or a toll, is claimable as an amount or … 1949. The lease, Ex.P/46, shows that at that time Neemueh was a Cantonment and the lease was executed by the Resident for Central India on

Jayantilal Kalabhai Mehta Vs. Ratilal Gulabdas Mehta

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Tenancy

Reported in : (1977)18GLR374

lands levied under the Bombay Municipal Boroughs Act, 1925, or the Bombay District Municipal Act, 1901, or the Cantonments Act, 1924, or the Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1933, as the case may be, is increased after the 31st day … West End Works (Civil Appeal No. 2068 of 1971) (1977) XVIII G.LR. 157 both decided together on March 12, 1976. Though the Supreme Court in … regards the liability of the tenant for eviction on account of non-payment of permitted increases as contemplated by Sections 10, 10A 10AA, IOC, 10CC, 10D and 10E of the Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control

Gopi Nath Vs. Satish Chandra

Court : Allahabad

Subject : CommercialLimitation

Acts : Partnership Act, 1932 - Sections 46; Limitation Act, 1908 - Sections 6 and 7 - Article 106; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 101 and 157; Trusts Act, 1882 - Sections 88

Reported in : AIR1964All53

was partner of a firm - surviving members are entitled to file suit for rendition of account. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … of the defendant to prove that the plaintiff was actually born in 1924 and not in 1927 as alleged by him. On these findings the … date of birth and it would be good evidence of the date of plaintiff's birth being admissible under Section 157 of the Evidence Act.Reliance in this connection has been placed on the case of Har Chand v. Dewan

Ajay Kumar Choudhary Vs. Union of India Through Defence Secretary and ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Principal Bench New Delhi

Subject : Right to Information

the period 16.9.2003 to 30.11.2003 and that by this action of CO provisions of Section 113 of the Cantonments Act, 1924 were violated and it was prejudicial to the interest of the Cantonment Board. Even this is not proved … vs. B. Karunakar and Ors. and the decision in Ram Kishan vs. Union of India (1995) 6 SCC 157 has held that: "It will not stand to reason that when the finding in favour of the delinquent

Adi Dara Patel and Others Vs. S. R. Jondhale and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Union territory or within the local limits of a cantonment declared as such under section 3 of the Cantonments Act, 1924 (2 of 1924), means the State Government. 157. The submission of Mr. Chidambaram is that assuming everything under

Sunil Kumar Kori and Anr. Vs. Gopal Das Kabra and Ors.Etc.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Election

the interim directions in the said Writ Petitions a substantial number of illegally constructed houses were demolished. The Cantonments Act, 2006 re-enacted the existing Act of 1924 after taking into consideration the recommendations made by the Standing Committee … be filed by an inhabitant to the preliminary proposals for imposition of a tax under Section 66. Likewise, Section 157 of the Act contemplates safety measures in case of outbreak of epidemic diseases covering inhabitants. Likewise, Section 180

Railway Express Agency, Inc. Vs. Virginia

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

question its constitutionality. Illinois Cent. R. Co. v. Minnesota, 309 U. S. 157 (1940); Great Northern R. Co. v. Minnesota, 278 U. S. 503 (1929); … Court's decisions sustain the application of a fairly apportioned general gross receipts tax to an interstate transportation company. Canton R. Co. v. Rogan, 340 U. S. 511 , 340 U. S. 515 -516; Central Greyhound Lines, Inc. … ] Railway Express Agency v. Virginia, 347 U. S. 359 (1954). Subsequently, the Virginia General Assembly enacted the Act here involved, levying a "franchise tax" on express companies, measured by gross receipts from operations within Virginia, in … property tax, and in fact the rate, as established by the latter section, has been used before the "in lieu" provision as a basis for

Mirza Mal Bhagwan Das Vs. Rameshar and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Civil

Reported in : AIR1929All536; 118Ind.Cas.145

produced in each case. In Moti Ram v. Mohammad Abdul Jalil A.I.R. 1924 All. 414, it was held that where a partnership consisted of numerous … Contract Act.13. In Vadi Lal Lallubhai v. Shah Kushal [1903] 27 Bom. 157, it was held that:Although a person carrying on business is a coparcener … said partnership concern, that on the recommendation of defendants 8 and 9, who carried on business in Nasirabad Cantonment, under the name of Bhaniram Chhote Lal and under a letter dated Asarh Badi 9 Sambat 1978, corresponding … accountable to such individuals alone and the minor members should not for the purposes of Section 4, Companies Act, be regarded as separate partners. In Mewa Ram v, Ram Gopal : AIR1926All337 it was decided that where

Shree Renuka Sugars Limited Vs. Union of India Ministry of Consumer Af ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

Krishna Sahakari Sakkare Karkhane Niyamit, Chikkodi. It is a Co-operative sugar factory registered under the Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act, 1959. It was established to cater to the needs of the sugarcane farmers in and around Chikkodi, Raibagh … Kilometers by Press Note No.1/1997 dated 10-1-1997. The Central Government in exercise of powers conferred on it by Section 3 of Essential Commodities Act, 1965, and by virtue of an amendment dated 10-11-2006 inserted Clause 6A, 6B,