Advanced Search Results

New Delhi Municipal Committee Vs. State of Punjab, Etc. Etc.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Municipal TaxConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 54, 133, 142, 239, 240, 241, 242, 243, 244, 245 ot 255, 256 to 263, 285, 289(1), 357, 367 and 372; Punjab Municipal Act, 1911 - Sections 61; Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957; New Delhi Municipal Council Act, 1994 - Sections 60, 62 and 119; Government of India Act, 1935 - Sections 5, 6, 94, 99, 100, 104, 154, 155(1) and 311(1); General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 3(58); Sea Customs Act, 1878 - Sections 20; Central Excises Act, 1944 - Sections 3; Government of India Act, 1919; Government of Part C States Act, 1951 - Sections 21, 22 and 38(22); Reorganisation Act, 1956; Union Territory by the Punjab (Reorganisation) Act, 1966; Government of Union Territories Act, 1963; State of Himachal Pradesh Act, 1970; North-Eastern Areas (Reorganisation) Ac

Reported in : AIR1997SC2847; JT1997(1)SC40; 1996(9)SCALE613; (1997)7SCC339; [1996]Supp10SCR472

on Property, such as, in the case of Entry 3, List I which deals with Cantonments and the Cantonments Act, 1924 which allows Parliament to levy taxes for Contonments. Mr. Sen then contended that such a power would be … the meaning and scheme of Article 289 and the object underlying it.44. Since Article 289 is successor to Section 155 of the Government of India Act, 1935-no doubt, with certain changes-it would be helpful to refer to and

Adi Dara Patel and Others Vs. S. R. Jondhale and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Union territory or within the local limits of a cantonment declared as such under section 3 of the Cantonments Act, 1924 (2 of 1924), means the State Government. 157. The submission of Mr. Chidambaram is that assuming everything under … entertained, then, the reliance of Mr. Chidambaram on Rule 5(2)(a)(ii) of the ULC Rules need not detain us. 155. In that regard, we find in the grounds in the petition at page 74 of the paper book

Kishanlal Agarwala and anr. Vs. State of Assam and anr.

Court : Guwahati

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Assam Panchayati Raj Act, 1973 - Sections 1 and 158; Assam Land and Revenue Regulations, 1886 - Rule 18(2) and 18(3)

area which has been or hereafter may be included in a municipality or a town committee or a cantonment as constituted under the Assam Municipal Act, 1956 (Assam Act XV of 1957) and Cantonment Act 1924 (Act … or a cantonment as constituted under the Assam Municipal Act, 1956 (Assam Act XV of 1957) and Cantonment Act 1924 (Act II of 1924) respectively or by any other Act.'The Assam Panchayati Raj Act, 1973 came into force … petitioner and the said other person protested and in a proceeding under Section 145 Cr. p. C. (MR Case No. 36 of 1973), the Chief

M.S.D. thenraja Vs. Executive Officer and anr.

Court : Chennai

Subject : ConstitutionElection

Acts : Election law; Cantonment Act, 1924 - Sections 27 and 28; The Cantonment Electoral Rules 1945 - Rules 4, 5, 6 and 47; Constitution of India - Article 226; Election Law

Reported in : 1997(2)CTC507

1997 filed his nomination to Ward No. 1.5. The elections to the Cantonment Board is regulated under the Cantonments Act, 1924 and the Cantonments Electoral Rules, 1945, hereinafter referred to, in short, as 'the Act' and 'the Rules', wherein … 4.30 P.M.4. In pursuance of the proclamation as scheduled, petitioner in W.P.No. 155 of 1997 filed his nomination paper for the election of Ward No. … also stated that at the instance of Mr. Denzil Sequra the police foisted a false case under various sections of the Penal Code and he was arrested on 31.12.1996 at 1.00 A.M. and let out on bail

Shiv Kumar Jatia Vs. S.R.G.P. Industries Ltd., Through Its Managing Di ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Specific Relief Act - Sections 6C, 40, 41 and 54; Cantonment Act, 1924; Transfer of Property Act - Sections 108 and 108(J); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2

Reported in : AIR2005All215; 2005(1)ARC431; 2005(2)AWC1457

as long as the development is in consonance with the building plans sanctioned in accordance with the Cantonment Act 1924. The answering respondent can construct as per the rights available to him under the Deeds, The deed specifically … sub-lessees rights in those permanent structures.30. In the 'Legal Glossory 1988' (Page 155), Published by Government of India, Ministry of Law and Justice, Department of … i.e. from Industrial to commercial Meanwhile plaintiff came to know that the defendant has obtained the sanction from Cantonment Board Kanpur, vide its resolution No. 26, dated 12.9.2000. This sanction was taken to erect a commercial complex … compensated by award or damages, discretionary relief of injunction is barred by Section 41(e) and 41(h) of Specific Relief Act. The balance of convenience is

State of U.P. Vs. Hari Ram.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Property

Acts : Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 - Sections 10(3), 3, 8(3), 10(1), 8(4), 10(2), 10(5), 10(6)

Union territory or within the local limits of a cantonment declared as such under section 3 of the Cantonments Act, 1924, (2 of 1924.) means that State Government.”12. Before examining the scope of sub-section (3) to Section 10 as … surrendering or delivering possession. The court in Maharaj Singh v. State of UP and Others (1977) 1 SCC 155, while interpreting Section 117(1) of U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reform Act, 1950 held that ‘vesting’ is a

Market Committee and ors. Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2005)94TTJ(Delhi)692

management of a municipal or local fund; or (iv) Cantonment Board as defined in Section 3 of the Cantonments Act, 1924 (2 of 1924)." The result of above Explanation is that Agricultural Marketing Board, Committee, etc., cannot be treated … Industry (1981) 130 ITR 186 (SC) (iv) CIT v. World Agriculture Fair Memorial Farmers' Welfare Trust Society (1985) 155 ITR 370 (Del) (v) CIT v. Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corpn. (1986) 159 ITR 1 (SC)Director of

United States Vs. International Business Machines Corp.

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

to, in order to save a statute from unconstitutionality." Hooper v. California, 155 U. S. 648 , 657 (1895). See also United States ex rel. … it violates none of the policies [that animate the Import-Export Clause]." Washington Stevedoring, supra, at 755. Relying on Canton R. Co. v. Rogan, 340 U. S. 511 (1951), which upheld a tax on the gross receipts of … the Export Clause's prohibition against federal taxation of goods in export transit and certain closely related services and activities, see, e. g., Thames & Mersey, supra, it has not exempted pre-export goods and services from ordinary tax … on goods in export transit. We hold that it does not. I Section 4371 of the Internal Revenue Code imposes a tax on insurance premiums

State of U.P. Vs. Hari Ram

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Miscellaneous

Union territory or within the local limits of a cantonment declared as such under section 3 of the Cantonments Act, 1924, (2 of 1924.) means that State Government.” 12. Before examining the scope of sub-section (3) to Section 10 … surrendering or delivering possession. The court in Maharaj Singh v. State of UP and Others (1977) 1 SCC 155.while interpreting Section 117(1) of U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reform Act, 1950 held that ‘vesting’ is a word